The Impact of Health Plan Physician-Tiering on Access to Care
- 100 Downloads
In an attempt to improve quality and control costs, health plans are creating tiered products that encourage enrollees to seek care from “high-value” physicians. However, tiered products may limit access to care because patients may have to travel unreasonable distances to visit the nearest high-value physician.
To assess geographic access to high-value physicians, particularly for disadvantaged populations.
Cross-sectional observational study.
Physicians and adult patients in Massachusetts.
Travel time from census block centroid to nearest physician address under two scenarios: patients can see (1) any physician or (2) only high-value physicians.
Among the physicians, 768 (20.9%) primary care physicians (PCPs), 225 (26.6%) obstetricians/gynecologists, 69 (10.3%) cardiologists, and 31 (6.0%) general surgeons met the definition of high-value. Statewide mean travel times to the nearest PCP, obstetrician/gynecologist, cardiologist, or general surgeon under the two scenarios (any physician vs. only high-value physicians) were 2.8 vs. 4.8, 6.0 vs. 7.2, 7.0 vs. 12.4, and 6.6 vs. 14.8 minutes, respectively. Across the four specialties, between 89.4%–99.4% of the population lived within 30 minutes of the nearest high-value physician. Rural populations had considerably longer travel times to see high-value physicians, but other disadvantaged populations generally had shorter travel times than comparison groups.
Most patients in Massachusetts are likely to have reasonable geographic access to high-value physicians in tiered health plans. However, local demographics, especially rural residence, should be taken into consideration when applying tiered health plans broadly. Future work should investigate whether patients can and will switch to receive care from high-value physicians.
KEY WORDSaccess high value care disparities
This work was supported by funding from RAND and the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. We also are grateful for the critical advice provided by John Adams and for programming support from Supriya Munshaw.
Conflict of Interest
- 7.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report 2008. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2009.Google Scholar
- 11.Adams JL, Thomas JW, McGlynn EA. Physician cost profiling—Reliability and risk of misclassification. Detailed methodology and sensitivity analyses. Santa Monica: RAND; 2010.Google Scholar
- 12.Minnesota Medical Association. The Tiering of Minnesota Physicians; 2006.Google Scholar
- 15.Criteria for designation of areas having shortages of primary medical care professionals health resources and services administration; relevant excerpts from 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 41, Part 45, Appendix A October 41, 1993;1934-1948.Google Scholar
- 16.Morse S. Converting addresses to/from latitude/longitude in one step. Available at: http://stevemorse.org/jcal/latlon.php. Accessed November 29,2010.
- 17.Council on Graduate Medical Education. Evaluation of Specialty Physician Workforce Methodologies. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.Google Scholar
- 19.The Lewin Group Cardiology Workforce Assessment. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2009.Google Scholar
- 21.Massachusetts Division of Health Care. Finance and Policy Primary care in Massachusetts: An overview of trends and opportunities: Boston, MA, 2010.Google Scholar
- 22.Massachusetts Medical Society. Massachusetts health reform: fact sheet: Boston, MA, 2010.Google Scholar
- 23.Merritt Hawkins & Associates. 2009 Survey of physician appointment wait times: Irving, TX; 2009.Google Scholar
- 25.Center for Workforce Studies. 2009 State Physician Workforce Data Book. Association of American Medical Colleges; 2009.Google Scholar