Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 480–486 | Cite as

Trends in Quality of Care and Barriers to Improvement in the Indian Health Service

  • Thomas D. Sequist
  • Theresa Cullen
  • Kenneth Bernard
  • Shimon Shaykevich
  • E. John Orav
  • John Z. Ayanian
Original Research

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Although Native Americans experience substantial disparities in health outcomes, little information is available regarding healthcare delivery for this population.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze trends in ambulatory quality of care and physician reports of barriers to quality improvement within the Indian Health Service (IHS).

DESIGN

Longitudinal analysis of clinical performance from 2002 to 2006 within the IHS, and a physician survey in 2007.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients cared for within the IHS and 740 federally employed physicians within the IHS.

MAIN MEASURES

Clinical performance for 12 measures of ambulatory care within the IHS; as well as physician reports of ability to access needed health services and use of quality improvement strategies. We examined the correlation between physician reports of access to mammography and clinical performance of breast cancer screening. A similar correlation was analyzed for diabetic retinopathy screening.

KEY RESULTS

Clinical performance significantly improved for 10 of the 12 measures from 2002 to 2006, including adult immunizations, cholesterol testing, and measures of blood pressure and cholesterol control for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Breast cancer screening rates decreased (44% to 40%, p = 0.002), while screening rates for diabetic retinopathy remained constant (51%). Fewer than half of responding primary care physicians reported adequate access to high-quality specialists (29%), non-emergency hospital admission (37%), high-quality imaging services (32%), and high-quality outpatient mental health services (16%). Breast cancer screening rates were higher at sites with higher rates of physicians reporting routine access to mammography compared to sites with lower rates of physicians reporting such access (46% vs. 35%, ρ = 0.27, p = 0.04). Most physicians reported using patient registries and decision support tools to improve patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of care has improved within the IHS for many services, however performance in specific areas may be limited by access to essential resources.

KEY WORDS

Indian health service Native American American Indian racial disparities quality of care quality improvement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. Sequist was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through the Harold Amos Minority Faculty Development Program and the Network for Multicultural Research on Health and Healthcare, Department of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, U.C.L.A. Dr. Ayanian was supported by the Health Disparities Research Program of Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH Award #UL1 RR 025758 and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers, the National Center for Research Resources, or the National Institutes of Health. This research was presented at the Annual Research Meetings of the Society of General Internal Medicine (Miami, FL) and Academy Health (Chicago, IL) in 2009. We would like to thank the Indian Health Service physicians and their patients for participating in this study.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Indian Health Disparities. Indian health service. Available at: http://info.ihs.gov/Disparities.asp. Accessed November 8, 2010.
  2. 2.
    Narva AS, Sequist TD. Reducing health disparities in American Indians with chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol. 2010;30:19–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control. Prevalence of heart disease–United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:113–118.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control. Diabetes prevalence among American Indians and Alaska Natives and the overall population–United States, 1994–2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:702–704.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beals J, Novins DK, Whitesell NR, Spicer P, Mitchell CM, Manson SM. Prevalence of mental disorders and utilization of mental health services in two American Indian reservation populations: mental health disparities in a national context. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1723–1732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lillie-Blanton M, Roubideaux Y. Understanding and addressing the health care needs of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:759–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. Agency for healthcare research and quality. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/qrdr08.htm. Accessed November 8, 2010. 2008
  8. 8.
    Wilson C, Gilliland S, Cullen T, Moore K, Roubideaux Y, Valdez L, Vanderwagen W, Acton K. Diabetes outcomes in the Indian health system during the era of the special diabetes program for Indians and the government performance and results act. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1518–1522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz RJ. Addressing the health care needs of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:13–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Year 2009 Profile. Indian health service. Available at: http://info.ihs.gov/Profile09.asp. Accessed November 8, 2010.
  11. 11.
    Roubideaux Y. Beyond Red Lake–the persistent crisis in American Indian health care. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1881–1883.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sequist TD, Cullen T, Ayanian JZ. Information technology as a tool to improve the quality of American Indian health care. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:2173–2179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sequist TD, Cullen T, Hays H, Taualii MM, Simon SR, Bates DW. Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian health service. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:191–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Contract Health Services. Indian health service. Available at: http://info.ihs.gov/CHS.asp. Accessed November 8, 2010.
  15. 15.
    National Center for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 2006: Technical specifications; 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    U.S. Census Bureau. Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/metroareas/metrodef.html. Accessed November 8, 2010.
  17. 17.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. The state of health care quality. Washington, DC 2007. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/136/Default.aspx. Accessed November 8, 2010.
  18. 18.
    Kemper P, Blumenthal D, Corrigan JM, Cunningham PJ, Felt SM, Grossman JM, Kohn LT, Metcalf CE, St Peter RF, Strouse RC, Ginsburg PB. The design of the community tracking study: a longitudinal study of health system change and its effects on people. Inquiry. 1996;33:195–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:575–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reschovsky JD, O’Malley AS. Do primary care physicians treating minority patients report problems delivering high-quality care? Health Aff. 2008;27:w222–w231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    St Peter RF, Reed MC, Kemper P, Blumenthal D. Changes in the scope of care provided by primary care physicians. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1980–1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sequist TD, Narva AS, Stiles SK, Karp SK, Cass A, Ayanian JZ. Access to renal transplantation among American Indians and Hispanics. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44:344–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sequist TD, Zaslavsky AM, Galloway JM, Ayanian JZ. Cardiac procedure use following acute myocardial infarction among American Indians. Am Heart J. 2006;151:909–914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moore K, Roubideaux Y, Noonan C, Goldberg J, Shields R, Acton K. Measuring the quality of diabetes care in urban and rural Indian health programs. Ethn Dis. 2006;16:772–777.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. Benchmarks and thresholds: 2006 MCO accreditation. National committee for quality assurance. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/422/Default.aspx. Accessed November 8, 2010.
  26. 26.
    Trivedi AN, Zaslavsky AM, Schneider EC, Ayanian JZ. Trends in the quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare managed care. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:692–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Westmoreland TM, Watson KR. Redeeming hollow promises: the case for mandatory spending on health care for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:600–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Colosia AD, Peltz G, Pohl G, Liu E, Copley-Merriman K, Khan S, Kaye JA. A review and characterization of the various perceptions of quality cancer care. Cancer. 2010.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cooperberg MR, Birkmeyer JD, Litwin MS. Defining high quality health care. Urol Oncol. 2009;27:411–416.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    IHS Profile. Indian health service. Available at: http://info.ihs.gov/Profile09.asp. Accessed November 8, 2010. 2009
  31. 31.
    Sequist TD. Paving the way–providing opportunities for Native American students. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1884–1886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sequist TD. Health careers for Native American students: challenges and opportunities for enrichment program design. J Interprof Care. 2007;21(Suppl 2):20–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilson C, Horton M, Cavallerano J, Aiello LM. Addition of primary care-based retinal imaging technology to an existing eye care professional referral program increased the rate of surveillance and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Diab Care. 2005;28:318–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas D. Sequist
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Theresa Cullen
    • 4
  • Kenneth Bernard
    • 1
  • Shimon Shaykevich
    • 1
  • E. John Orav
    • 1
  • John Z. Ayanian
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Care PolicyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Harvard Vanguard Medical AssociatesBostonUSA
  4. 4.Indian Health ServiceRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations