Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 437–439 | Cite as

The Treachery of Images: How René Magritte Informs Medical Education

Perspectives

ABSTRACT

Using René Magritte’s well-known painting The Treachery of Images (This is not a pipe), we argue that the current focus on competencies throughout medical education can sometimes lead educators to rely too heavily on scores, checkmarks, or other forms of assessment that come to be viewed as equivalents for the actual existence of what is being measured. Magritte insisted that the image he created on the canvas was not a pipe but rather a representation of a pipe, an important distinction for educators to remember as we seek ways to evaluate trainees’ attainment of the fundamental knowledge and skills of the profession. We also urge that the focus on broader skills, values, flexibility, reflection, and insight development should fall outside the net of a competency orientation in a supportive environment spared from traditional assessment methods, using a classroom in undergraduate medical education as an example of working toward this end.

KEY WORDS

medical education assessment competency 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Carver R. A small good thing. In: Coles R, Testa R, eds. A Life in Medicine. New York: The New Press; 2002:180–203.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campo R. Like a prayer. In: The Desire to Heal. New York: Norton; 1997: 13-33.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haslett A. The good doctor. In: You Are Not a Stranger There. New York: Anchor Books; 2002: 24-47.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klass P. Crying in the hospital. In: A Not Entirely Benign Procedure. New York: Putnam; 1987: 63-66.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287:226–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Torczyner H. Magritte, Ideas and Images. Miller E (trans.). New York: Harry N. Abrams; 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brooks MA. Medical education and the tyranny of competency. Perspect Biol Med. 2009;52(1):90–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wald HS, Reis SP, Borkan JM. Reflection rubric development: evaluating medical students’ reflective writing. Med Educ. 2009;43:1110–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wald HD, Reis SP. Beyond the margins: reflective writing and development of reflective capacity in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;(7):746-9.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bleakley A. ‘Good’ and ‘poor’ communication in an OSCE: education or training? Med Educ. 2003;37:186–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wear D, Varley J. Rituals of verification: the role of simulation in developing and evaluating empathic communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2008:153-6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greene M. Art and imagination: reclaiming the sense of possibility. Phi Delta Kappan. 2005; January:378-382.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stone J. He makes a house call. In: In All This Rain. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisana State University Press; 1972:4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shafer A. Monday morning. In: Sleep Talker. Xlibris; 2001:50-51.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zarconi J. Legal advice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:589–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greene M. Toward wide-awakeness: an argument for the arts and humanities in education. Teach Coll Rec. 1977;79:119–25.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young JR. When computers leave classrooms, so does boredom. Chronicle of Higher Education. July 20, 2009. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/Teach-Naked-Effort-Strips/47398/ Accessed November 2010.

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioral and Community Health SciencesNortheastern Ohio Universities College of MedicineRootstownUSA
  2. 2.Medical EducationSumma Health SystemAkronUSA
  3. 3.Internal MedicineNortheastern Ohio Universities College of MedicineRootstownUSA

Personalised recommendations