Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 299–306 | Cite as

Quality Concerns with Routine Alcohol Screening in VA Clinical Settings

  • Katharine A. Bradley
  • Gwen T. Lapham
  • Eric J. Hawkins
  • Carol E. Achtmeyer
  • Emily C. Williams
  • Rachel M. Thomas
  • Daniel R. Kivlahan
Original Research

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Alcohol screening questionnaires have typically been validated when self- or researcher-administered. Little is known about the performance of alcohol screening questionnaires administered in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of alcohol screening conducted as part of routine outpatient clinical care in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System to the results on the same alcohol screening questionnaire completed on a mailed survey within 90 days and identify factors associated with discordant screening results.

DESIGN

Cross sectional.

PARTICIPANTS

A national sample of 6,861 VA outpatients (fiscal years 2007–2008) who completed the AUDIT-C alcohol screening questionnaire on mailed surveys (survey screen) within 90 days of having clinical AUDIT-C screening documented in their medical records (clinical screen).

MAIN MEASURES

Alcohol screening results were considered discordant if patients screened positive (AUDIT-C ≥ 5) on either the clinical or survey screen but not both. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the prevalence of discordance in different patient subgroups based on demographic and clinical characteristics, VA network and temporal factors (e.g. the order of screens).

KEY RESULTS

Whereas 11.1% (95% CI 10.4-11.9%) of patients screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use on the survey screen, 5.7% (5.1- 6.2%) screened positive on the clinical screen. Of 765 patients who screened positive on the survey screen, 61.2% (57.7-64.6%) had discordant results on the clinical screen, contrasted with 1.5% (1.2-1.8%) of 6096 patients who screened negative on the survey screen. In multivariable analyses, discordance was significantly increased among Black patients compared with White, and among patients who had a positive survey AUDIT-C screen or who received care at 4 of 21 VA networks.

CONCLUSION

Use of a validated alcohol screening questionnaire does not—by itself—ensure the quality of alcohol screening. This study suggests that the quality of clinical alcohol screening should be monitored, even when well-validated screening questionnaires are used.

KEY WORDS

alcohol screening brief alcohol counseling validation 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Saitz R. Clinical practice. Unhealthy alcohol use. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(6):596–607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Room R, Babor T, Rehm J. Alcohol and public health. Lancet. 2005;365(9458):519–530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, Orleans T, Klein J. Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:557–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaner E, Beyer F, Dickinson H, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD004148.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Solberg LI, Maciosek MV, Edwards NM. Primary care intervention to reduce alcohol misuse ranking its health impact and cost effectiveness. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(2):143–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradley KA, Williams EC, Achtmeyer CE, Volpp B, Collins BJ, Kivlahan DR. Implementation of evidence-based alcohol screening in the Veterans Health Administration. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2006;12(10):597–606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lapham GT, Achtmeyer CE, Williams EC, Hawkins EJ, Kivlahan DR, Bradley KA. Increased documented brief alcohol interventions with a performance measure and electronic decision support. Med. Care. In Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol use disorders identification test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–1795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradley KA, Bush KR, Epler AJ, et al. Two brief alcohol-screening tests From the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation in a female Veterans Affairs patient population. Arch Intern Med. 2003;16(7):821–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(7):1208–1217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frank D, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Kivlahan DR, Bradley KA. Effectiveness of the AUDIT-C as a screening test for alcohol misuse in three race/ethnic groups. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(6):781–787.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aertgeerts B, Buntinx F, Ansoms S, Fevery J. Screening properties of questionnaires and laboratory tests for the detection of alcohol abuse or dependence in a general practice population. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(464):206–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rumpf HJ, Hapke U, Meyer C, John U. Screening for alcohol use disorders and at-risk drinking in the general population: psychometric performance of three questionnaires. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37(3):261–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hawkins EJ, Kivlahan DR, Williams EC, Wright SM, Craig T, Bradley KA. Examining quality issues in alcohol misuse screening. Subst Abus. 2007;28(3):53–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goulet JL, Erdos J, Kancir S, et al. Measuring performance directly using the veterans health administration electronic medical record: a comparison with external peer review. Med Care. 2007;45(1):73–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wright SM, Craig T, Campbell S, Schaefer J, Humble C. Patient satisfaction of female and male users of Veterans Health Administration services. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(Suppl 3):S26–S32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bradley KA, McDonell MB, Bush K, Kivlahan DR, Diehr P, Fihn SD. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change in older male primary care patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22(8):1842–1849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dybek I, Bischof G, Grothues J, et al. The reliability and validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a German general practice population sample. J Stud Alcohol. 2006;67(3):473–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bradley KA, Williams EC, Achtmeyer CE, et al. Measuring performance of brief alcohol counseling in medical settings:a review of the options and lessons from the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. Subst Abus. 2007;28(4):133–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bradley KA, Kivlahan DR, Zhou XH, et al. Using alcohol screening results and treatment history to assess the severity of at-risk drinking in Veterans Affairs primary care patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28(3):448–455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Au DH, Kivlahan DR, Bryson CL, Blough D, Bradley KA. Alcohol screening scores and risk of hospitalizations for GI conditions in men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(3):443–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harris AH, Bryson CL, Sun H, Blough D, Bradley KA. Alcohol screening scores predict risk of subsequent fractures. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44:1055–1069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bryson CL, Au DH, Sun H, Williams EC, Kivlahan DR, Bradley KA. Alcohol screening scores and medication nonadherence. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(11):795–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stata Statistical Software: Release Special Edition 11.1 [computer program]. College Station TX: Stata Corporation; 2007.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kinder LS, Bryson CL, Sun H, Williams EC, Bradley KA. Alcohol screening scores and all-cause mortality in male Veterans Affairs patients. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;70(2):253–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCambridge J, Day M. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of completing the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test questionnaire on self-reported hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2008;103(2):241–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kypri K, Langley JD, Saunders JB, Cashell-Smith ML. Assessment may conceal therapeutic benefit: findings from a randomized controlled trial for hazardous drinking. Addiction. 2007;102(1):62–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moos RH. Context and mechanisms of reactivity to assessment and treatment. Addiction. 2008;103(2):249–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davis CG, Thake J, Vilhena N. Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms. Addict. Behav. Nov 10 2009.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bradley KA, Bush KR, McDonell MB, Malone T, Fihn SD. Screening for problem drinking: comparison of CAGE and AUDIT. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(6):379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2009;15(9):e71–e87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Helzer JE, Rose GL, Badger GJ, et al. Using interactive voice response to enhance brief alcohol intervention in primary care settings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(2):251–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Babor TF, Stephens RS, Marlatt A. Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism: response bias and its minimization. J Stud Alcohol. 1987;48:410–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Del Boca FK, Darkes J. The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research. Addiction. 2003;98(Suppl 2):1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Walter LC, Davidowitz NP, Heineken PA, Covinsky KE. Pitfalls of converting practice guidelines into quality measures: lessons learned from a VA performance measure. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2466–2470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaner E, Bland M, Cassidy P, et al. Screening and brief interventions for hazardous and harmful alcohol use in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brown RL, Saunders LA, Bobula JA, Mundt MP, Koch PE. Randomized-controlled trial of a telephone and mail intervention for alcohol use disorders: three-month drinking outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(8):1372–1379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Willenbring ML, Olson DH. A randomized trial of integrated outpatient treatment for medically ill alcoholic men. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(16):1946–1952.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Willenbring ML. Medications to treat alcohol dependence: adding to the continuum of care. JAMA. 2007;298(14):1691–1692.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Anton RF, O'Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295(17):2003–2017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharine A. Bradley
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Gwen T. Lapham
    • 1
    • 5
  • Eric J. Hawkins
    • 1
    • 6
  • Carol E. Achtmeyer
    • 1
  • Emily C. Williams
    • 1
    • 5
  • Rachel M. Thomas
    • 1
  • Daniel R. Kivlahan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D)Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education (CESATE)SeattleUSA
  3. 3.General Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care SystemSeattleUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  5. 5.Department of Health ServicesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  6. 6.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations