Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 64–69 | Cite as

Follow-up Actions on Electronic Referral Communication in a Multispecialty Outpatient Setting

  • Hardeep Singh
  • Adol Esquivel
  • Dean F. Sittig
  • Daniel Murphy
  • Himabindu Kadiyala
  • Rachel Schiesser
  • Donna Espadas
  • Laura A. Petersen
Original Research

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES

Electronic health records (EHR) enable transmission and tracking of referrals between primary-care practitioners (PCPs) and subspecialists. We used an EHR to examine follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a large multispecialty VA facility.

METHODS

We retrieved outpatient referrals to five subspecialties between October 2006 and December 2007, and queried the EHR to determine their status: completed, discontinued (returned to PCP), or unresolved (no action taken by subspecialist). All unresolved referrals, and random samples of discontinued and completed referrals were reviewed to determine whether subspecialists took follow-up actions (i.e., schedule appointments anytime in the future) within 30 days of referral-receipt. For referrals without timely follow-up, we determined whether inaction was supported by any predetermined justifiable reasons or associated with certain referral characteristics. We also reviewed if PCPs took the required action on returned information.

RESULTS

Of 61,931 referrals, 22,535 were discontinued (36.4%), and 474 were unresolved (0.8%). We selected 412 discontinued referrals randomly for review. Of these, 52% lacked follow-up actions within 30 days. Appropriate justifications for inaction were documented in 69.8% (150/215) of those without action and included lack of prerequisite testing by the PCP and subspecialist opinion that no intervention was required despite referral. We estimated that at 30 days, 6.3% of all referrals were associated with an unexplained lack of follow-up actions by subspecialists. Conversely, 7.4% of discontinued referrals returned to PCPs were associated with an unexplained lack of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the EHR facilitates transmission of valuable information at the PCP-subspecialist interface, unexplained communication breakdowns in the referral process persist in a subset of cases.

KEY WORDS

referrals primary care sub-specialty care electronic health records patient safety health information technology communication diagnostic errors patient follow-up 

Notes

Funding Source

The study was supported by an NIH K23 career development award (K23CA125585) to Dr. Singh, the VA National Center of Patient Safety, and in part by the Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence (HFP90-020).

These sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Data

All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

References

  1. 1.
    Forrest CB. A typology of specialists’ clinical roles. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1062–1068.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grimshaw JM, Winkens RA, Shirran L et al. Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD005471.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cummins RO, Smith RW, Inui TS. Communication failure in primary care. Failure of consultants to provide follow-up information. JAMA. 1980;243:1650–1652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epstein RM. Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:403–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graham PH. Improving communication with specialists. The case of an oncology clinic. Med J Aust. 1994;160:625–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hull FM, Westerman RF. Referral to medical outpatients department at teaching hospitals in Birmingham and Amsterdam. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;293:311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nutting PA, Franks P, Clancy CM. Referral and consultation in primary care: do we understand what we’re doing? J Fam Pract. 1992;35:21–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldman L, Lee T, Rudd P. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143:1753–1755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linzer M, Myerburg RJ, Kutner JS, et al. Exploring the generalist-subspecialist interface in internal medicine. Am J Med. 2006;119:528–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mathew ST. Ordering and interpreting diagnostic studies…but who is caring for the patient? Eur J Intern Med. 2004;15:207–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sibert L, Lachkar A, Grise P, Charlin B, Lechevallier J, Weber J. Communication between consultants and referring physicians: a qualitative study to define learning and assessment objectives in a specialty residency program. Teach Learn Med. 2002;14:15–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee TH. Proving and improving the value of consultations. Am J Med. 2002;113:527–528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pearson SD. Principles of generalist-specialist relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:S13–S20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gandhi TK, Sittig DF, Franklin M, Sussman AJ, Fairchild DG, Bates DW. Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:626–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stille CJ, Primack WA, Savageau JA. Generalist-subspecialist communication for children with chronic conditions: a regional physician survey. Pediatrics. 2003;112:1314–1320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stille CJ, McLaughlin TJ, Primack WA, Mazor KM, Wasserman RC. Determinants and impact of generalist-specialist communication about pediatric outpatient referrals. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1341–1349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen AH, Yee HF Jr. Improving the primary care-specialty care interface: getting from here to there. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1024–1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim-Hwang JE, Chen AH, Bell DS, Guzman D, Yee HF, Jr., Kushel MB. Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim Y, Chen A, Keith E, Yee H, Kushel M. Not perfect, but better: primary care providers experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:614–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deckard GJ, Borkowski N, Diaz D, Sanchez C, Boisette SA. Improving timeliness and efficiency in the referral process for safety net providers: application of the Lean Six Sigma methodology. J Ambul Care Manage. 2010;33:124–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Singh H, Thomas EJ, Sittig DF, et al. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010;123:238–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, et al. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1578–1586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: A study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488–496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee T, Pappius EM, Goldman L. Impact of inter-physician communication on the effectiveness of medical consultations. Am J Med. 1983;74:106–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Conley J, Jordan M, Ghali WA. Audit of the consultation process on general internal medicine services. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:59–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sittig DF, Gandhi TK, Franklin M, et al. A computer-based outpatient clinical referral system. Int J Med Inform. 1999;55:149–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hardeep Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adol Esquivel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dean F. Sittig
    • 3
  • Daniel Murphy
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Himabindu Kadiyala
    • 2
    • 5
  • Rachel Schiesser
    • 2
  • Donna Espadas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laura A. Petersen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence and The Center of Inquiry to Improve Outpatient Safety Through Effective Electronic CommunicationMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services ResearchHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  3. 3.University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences and the UT-Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality & SafetyHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Family & Community MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  5. 5.Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations