Outcomes of Minimal and Moderate Support Versions of an Internet-Based Diabetes Self-Management Support Program
- 850 Downloads
Internet and other interactive technology-based programs offer great potential for practical, effective, and cost-efficient diabetes self-management (DSM) programs capable of reaching large numbers of patients. This study evaluated minimal and moderate support versions of an Internet-based diabetes self-management program, compared to an enhanced usual care condition.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
A three-arm practical randomized trial was conducted to evaluate minimal contact and moderate contact versions of an Internet-based diabetes self-management program, offered in English and Spanish, compared to enhanced usual care. A heterogeneous sample of 463 type 2 patients was randomized and 82.5% completed a 4-month follow-up. Primary outcomes were behavior changes in healthy eating, physical activity, and medication taking. Secondary outcomes included hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, lipids, and blood pressure.
The Internet-based intervention produced significantly greater improvements than the enhanced usual care condition on three of four behavioral outcomes (effect sizes [d] for healthy eating = 0.32; fat intake = 0.28; physical activity= 0.19) in both intent-to-treat and complete-cases analyses. These changes did not translate into differential improvements in biological outcomes during the 4-month study period. Added contact did not further enhance outcomes beyond the minimal contact intervention.
The Internet intervention meets several of the RE-AIM criteria for potential public health impact, including reaching a large number of persons, and being practical, feasible, and engaging for participants, but with mixed effectiveness in improving outcomes, and consistent results across different subgroups. Additional research is needed to evaluate longer-term outcomes, enhance effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and understand the linkages between intervention processes and outcomes.
KEY WORDSinternet diabetes self-management RCT health disparities behavior change practical trial
This study was supported by grant #DK35524 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.
Conflict of Interest
- 2.Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008:465–86.Google Scholar
- 3.Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet07.htm. Accessed 07-22-10.
- 4.Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE et al. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;April 18:CD003417.Google Scholar
- 9.Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289(14):1833-1836; PMID 12684363.Google Scholar
- 11.Goldstein MG, Whitlock EP, DePue J. Multiple health risk behavior interventions in primary care: Summary of research evidence. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(2 Suppl):61-79; PMID 15275675.Google Scholar
- 14.Latino Issues Forum. Latinos, computers and the Internet: How congress and the current administration's framing of the Digital Divide has negatively impacted policy initiatives established to lose the significant technology gap the remains. 2004. Berkeley, Ca.Google Scholar
- 17.Glasgow RE, Edwards LL, Whitesides H et al. Reach and effectiveness of DVD and in-person diabetes self-management education. Chronic Illness. 2009;5:243-249; PMID 19933245.Google Scholar
- 18.Thoolen B, de Ridder D, Bensing J et al. Who participates in diabetes self-management interventions? Issues of recruitment and retention. Diabetes Educ. 2007;May/Jun;33:465-474; PMID 17570877.Google Scholar
- 19.Glasgow RE, Linnan LA. Evaluation of theory-based interventions. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:487–508.Google Scholar
- 20.Welch G, Shayne R. Interactive behavioral technologies and diabetes self-management support: Recent research findings from clinical trials. Curr Diab Rep. 2006;6:130-136; PMID 16542624.Google Scholar
- 21.Boren SA, Gunlock TL, Krishna S. et al. Computer-aided diabetes education: A synthesis of randomized controlled trials. AMIA Symposium Proceedings; 2006.Google Scholar
- 22.Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11; PMID 15829473.Google Scholar
- 23.Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancey CM. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290:1624-1632; PMID 14506122.Google Scholar
- 25.Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Kurz D et al. Recruitment for an Internet-based diabetes self-management program: Scientific and ethical implications. Ann Behav Med. 2010;Apr 22 (epub ahead of print). PMID: 20411443.Google Scholar
- 26.Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK et al. A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(12):1167-1174; PMID 15610326.Google Scholar
- 27.Glasgow RE, Christiansen S, Kurz D, et al. Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: Usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Internet Med Res . 2010. In PressGoogle Scholar
- 29.Lorig K, Holman H, Sobel Det al. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions. Palo Alto, CA: Bull Publishing; 2000.Google Scholar
- 30.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
- 32.Ammerman A. Starting the conversation-diet. Instrument developed by University of North Carolina in conjunction with NC Prevention Partners, and Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention Branch, NC DHHS. 2004. Personal CommunicationGoogle Scholar
- 33.Fernald DH, Froshang DB, Dickinson LM et al. Common measures, better outcomes (COMBO): A field test of brief health behavior measures in primary care. Amer J Prev Med. 2008;35(5S):S414-422.Google Scholar
- 34.Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Subar AF, et al. Performance of a short instrument to estimate usual dietary intake of percent calories from fat. Euro J Clin Nutr. 1998;52:S63.Google Scholar
- 35.Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC et al. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: Outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(7):1126-1141; PMID 11445760.Google Scholar
- 36.Krousel-Wood M, Munter P, Jannu A et al. Reliability of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. Am J Med Sci. 2005;330:182-133; PMID 16174996.Google Scholar
- 37.Schafer JL. Multivariate normal multiple imputation algorithms. Pennsylvania State University, Department of Statistics University Park. 1994.Google Scholar
- 39.Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Strycker LA et al. Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(1):67-73; PMID 16414426.Google Scholar
- 43.Pew Internet Use Reports. Available at: http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=Pew±Internet±Use±Reports&FORM=EWRE&qpvt=Pew±Internet±Use±Reports. Accessed July 22, 2010.
- 44.Internet World Statistics. Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats14.htm. Accessed July 22, 2010.