Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 1071–1077 | Cite as

Experience with Health Coach-Mediated Physician Referral in an Employed Insured Population

  • Karen DonelanEmail author
  • Sowmya R. Rao
  • Robert S. Rogers
  • Johanna R. Mailhot
  • Robert Galvin
Original Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given increasing interest in helping consumers choose high-performing (higher quality, lower cost) physicians, one approach chosen by several large employers is to provide assistance in the form of a telephonic “health coach” — a registered nurse who assists with identifying appropriate and available providers.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the health coach’s influence on provider choice and the quality of the user experience in the early introduction of this service.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of 3490 employees and covered dependents of a large national firm that offered health coach services to all employees and covered dependents. The survey began in September 2007 with proportionate stratified sampling of 1750 employees and covered dependents who used the services between October 2007 and February 2008, and 1740 non-users.

PARTICIPANTS

Insured adults (ages 21–64) employed by a large national firm or covered dependents of employees.

MEASUREMENTS

Awareness of the service, reason for using service, visits to providers recommended by service, use of health advice provided by service, user satisfaction.

MAIN RESULTS

The primary reason for using the service was to obtain provider referrals (73%). Fifty-two percent of users sought a specialist referral, 33% a PCP referral and 9% a hospital referral. Eighty-nine percent of users seeking a provider referral were referred in-network; 81% of those referred visited the referred provider. Measures of satisfaction with both the service and the care delivered by recommended providers were over 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Customers largely follow the provider recommendation of the health coach. Users express general satisfaction with existing health coach services, but differences in performance between vendors highlight the need for the services to be well implemented.

KEY WORDS

health coach physician referral physician performance data employee assistance program survey 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge with gratitude the contributions of David Blumenthal MD, MPP (formerly of Massachusetts General Hospital), Angela Cafferillo, Margaret Damiano and Ginny Proestakes (General Electric), Roy Crowdis and Diane Downs (Medstat), Michael Chernew (Harvard Medical School) and Amy Schoenfeld (formerly at MGH).

Funding Sources

This research was funded in its entirety by General Electric through a contract with the Massachusetts General Hospital and the MGH Institute for Health Policy.

Disclosure

One of our authors, Robert Galvin, MD, is employed by General Electric, a sponsor of this research. No other author has any conflict of interest to disclose.

Prior presentation

Some data from this research project was presented at the Annual Research Meeting of AcademyHealth, Chicago, IL, June 28–30, 2009.

Supplementary material

11606_2010_1428_MOESM1_ESM.doc (22 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 22 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechtseiner EA. National ambulatory medical care survey: 2006 summary. National Center for Health Statistics: National Health Statistics Report 6 Aug 2008; 3 (Table 7).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blumenthal D. Employer-sponsored insurance - riding the health care tiger. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:195–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. A National Survey: Americans as Health Care Consumers: The Role of Quality Information. Kaiser Family Foundation and The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Oct 1996. Available from: http://www.kff.org/insurance/upload/Americans-as-Health-Care-Consumers-The-Role-of-Quality-Information-Toplines-Survey.pdf [Accessed 27 May 2010].
  4. 4.
    Hibbard JH, Peters E, Slovic P, Finucane ML, Tusler M. Making health care quality reports easier to use. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2001;27:591–604.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schaufler HH, Mordavsky K. Consumer reports in health care: do they make a difference? Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Tusler M. Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? Health Aff. 2003;22:84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hibbard JH, Stockard J. TuslerM. Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation. Health Aff. 2005;24:1150–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hibbard JH, Harris-Kojetin L, Mullin P, Lubalin J, Garfinkel S. Increasing the impact of health plan report cards by addressing consumers' concerns. Health Aff. 2000;19:138–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Longo DR, Land G, Schramm W, Fraas J, Hoskins B, Howell V. Consumer reports in health care: do they make a difference in patient care. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:1579–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abraham J. Employee awareness of provider quality information: the BHCAG experience. Research Practice; 2005.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schneider E, Epstein A. Influence of cardiac surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care: a survey of cardiovascular specialists' surgery. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:251–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider E, Epstein A. Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;279:1638–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. 2008 Update on consumers’ views of patient safety and quality information. Kaiser Family Foundation Oct 2008, Available from: http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/7819.pdf [accessed 27 May 2010].
  14. 14.
    Harris KM. How do patients choose physicians? evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:711–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Midwest Business Group on Health. Finding doctors in Chicago: a project to improve online physician directories. The Commonwealth Fund; Mar 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abraham J, Feldman R, Carlin C. Understanding employee awareness of health care quality information: how can employers benefit? Health Serv Res. 2004;39:1799–815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    California HealthCare Foundation. Snapshot - just looking: consumer use of the internet to manage care. 2008. Available from: http://www.chcf.org/publications/2008/05/just-looking-consumer-use-of-the-internet-to-manage-care [accessed 27 May 2010].
  18. 18.
    Medicare Payment Advisory Committee. Chapter 5: Access to care in the Medicare program, in A Data Book: Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program; Jun 2008. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun08DataBook_Entire_report.pdf [accessed 27 May 2010].
  19. 19.
    Shute N. Can’t find a doctor? Available from: http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/living-well-usn/2008/03/19/cant-find-a-doctor-youre-not-alone.html [accessed 27 May 2010].
  20. 20.
    Brown K. Mass. health care reform reveals doctor shortage. National Public Radio. Available from: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97620520 [accessed 27 May 2010].
  21. 21.
    Rubenstein S. Medicare patients struggle to find primary care docs. Wall Street Journal. Available from: http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/12/09/medicare-patients-struggle-to-find-primary-care-docs/ [accessed 27 May 2010].
  22. 22.
    Rosen M, Liebowitz A. Health advocacy: saving time and money for employers and employees. Employee Benefits, Society of Financial Service Professionals; Aug 2004: 6–7.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fronstin P, Collins SR. Findings from the 2007 EBRI/Commonwealth Fund consumerism in health survey. The Employee Benefit Research Institute and The Commonwealth Fund, March 2008.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen LA, Santos S, Jandorf L, et al. A program to enhance completion of screening colonoscopy among urban minorities. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:443–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S. The Effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health. 2008;85:114–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Freeman HP. A model patient navigation program. Oncology Issues Sep–Oct 2004: 44–46.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Freeman HP. Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities. J Urban Health. 2006;83:139–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    SAS Institute. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2002–2005. Available from: http://support.sas.com/onlinedoc/913/docMainpage.jsp [Accessed 27 May 2010].
  29. 29.
    Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN language manual, release 9.0.3. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 2004. Available from: http://www.rti.org/sudaan/pdf_files/SUDAAN_Language_Manual_Addendum_903.pdf [Accessed 27 May 2010].
  30. 30.
    Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. The CAHPS Benchmarking Database. Available from: https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/CAHPSIDB/Public/QuexList.aspx [accessed 27 May 2010].

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Donelan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sowmya R. Rao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert S. Rogers
    • 1
  • Johanna R. Mailhot
    • 1
  • Robert Galvin
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Health PolicyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Biostatistics CenterMassachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.General Electric, Fairfield, CTYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations