Joy and Challenges in Improving Chronic Illness Care: Capturing Daily Experiences of Academic Primary Care Teams
- 243 Downloads
Two chronic care collaboratives (The National Collaborative and the California Collaborative) were convened to facilitate implementing the chronic care model (CCM) in academic medical centers and into post-graduate medical education.
We developed and implemented an electronic team survey (ETS) to elicit, in real-time, team member’s experiences in caring for people with chronic illness and the effect of the Collaborative on teams and teamwork.
The ETS is a qualitative survey based on Electronic Event Sampling Methodology. It is designed to collect meaningful information about daily experience and any event that might influence team members’ daily work and subsequent outcomes.
Forty-one residency programs from 37 teaching hospitals participated in the collaboratives and comprised faculty and resident physicians, nurses, and administrative staff.
Each team member participating in the collaboratives received an e-mail with directions to complete the ETS for four weeks during 2006 (the National Collaborative) and 2007 (the California Collaborative).
At the team level, the response rate to the ETS was 87% with team members submitting 1,145 narrative entries. Six key themes emerged from the analysis, which were consistent across all sites. Among teams that achieved better clinical outcomes on Collaborative clinical indicators, an additional key theme emerged: professional work satisfaction, or “Joy in Work”. In contrast, among teams that performed lower in collaborative measures, two key themes emerged that reflected the effect of providing care in difficult institutional environments—“lack of professional satisfaction” and awareness of “system failures”.
The ETS provided a unique perspective into team performance and the day-to-day challenges and opportunities in chronic illness care. Further research is needed to explore systematic approaches to integrating the results from this study into the design of improvement efforts for clinical teams.
KEY WORDSchronic illness team joy in work graduate medical education ambulatory training interprofessional training
The national staff and faculty for the Academic Chronic Care Collaboratives were supported by generous grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the California HealthCare Foundation. The work reported in this manuscript was presented at the Academy Health Annual Research Meeting. June 28, 2009. Chicago, Illinois.
Conflict of Interest
- 1.World Health Organization. Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment: World Health Organization; 2005.Google Scholar
- 6.Council on Graduate Medical Education. Physician Workforce Policy Guildelines for the United States, 2000–2020. Rockville, MD: COGME2005.Google Scholar
- 7.Wagner E, Austin B, Von Korff M. Organizing care for chronic disease. Millbank Quarterly. 1996;(74):511–44.Google Scholar
- 9.Stevens D, Bowen J, Johnson J, DM W, Provost L, Holman H, et al. A Multi-institutional quality improvement initiative to transform chronic illness care and education in resident continuity practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2010(XX:XX–XX).Google Scholar
- 10.Braithwaite J, Westbrook J, Ranmuthugala G, Cunningham F, Plumb J, Wiley J, et al. The development, design, testing, refinement, simulation, and application of an evaluation framework for communities of practice and social-professional networks. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(162).Google Scholar
- 11.Wenger E, McDermott R, Synder W. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.Google Scholar
- 12.Bowen J, Stevens D, Sixta C, Provost L, Johnson J, DM W, et al. Developing measures of educational change for collaborative teams implementing the chronic care model in teaching practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2010(XX:XX–XX).Google Scholar
- 13.Amabile T, Whitney D, Winstock J, Miller L, Fallang C. What Really Happens in Creative Projects: Event Sampling Through Electronic Data Collection. Cambridge: Harvard University; 1997.Google Scholar
- 15.Larson R, Csikszentmihalyi M. The experience sampling method. New Dir Methodol Soc Behav Sci. 1983;15:41–56.Google Scholar
- 17.Scientific Software Development Company G. ATLAS.ti. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
- 18.Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002(36):3392–40.Google Scholar
- 19.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
- 20.Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Assessment Scale for Collaboratives. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2004.Google Scholar
- 21.Schon D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. USA: Basic Books, Inc; 1983.Google Scholar
- 22.Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper-Collins; 1996.Google Scholar
- 24.Bakke D. Joy at Work: A Revolutionary Approach to Fun on the Job. Seattle: PVG; 2005.Google Scholar