Longitudinal Patterns in Survival, Comorbidity, Healthcare Utilization and Quality of Care among Older Women Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis
- 224 Downloads
To compare longitudinal patterns of health care utilization and quality of care for other health conditions between breast cancer-surviving older women and a matched cohort without breast cancer.
Prospective five-year longitudinal comparison of cases and matched controls.
Newly identified breast cancer patients recruited during 1997–1999 from four geographic regions (Los Angeles, CA; Minnesota; North Carolina; and Rhode Island; N = 422) were matched by age, race, baseline comorbidity and zip code location with up to four non-breast-cancer controls (N = 1,656).
Survival; numbers of hospitalized days and physician visits; total inpatient and outpatient Medicare payments; guideline monitoring for patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes, and bone density testing and colorectal cancer screening.
Five-year survival was similar for cases and controls (80% and 82%, respectively; p = 0.18). In the first follow-up year, comorbidity burden and health care utilization were higher for cases (p < 0.01), with most differences diminishing over time. However, the number of physician visits was higher for cases (p < 0.01) in every year, driven partly by more cancer and surgical specialist visits. Cases and controls adhered similarly to recommended bone density testing, and monitoring of cardiovascular disease and diabetes; adherence to recommended colorectal cancer screening was better among cases.
Breast cancer survivors’ health care utilization and disease burden return to pre-diagnosis levels after one year, yet their greater use of outpatient care persists at least five years. Quality of care for other chronic health problems is similar for cases and controls.
KEY WORDSsurvival case-control inpatient care outpatient care costs preventive care
This work was supported by grants CA106979, CA/AG 70818, CA84506, and CA92395 from the National Cancer Institute.
Conflict of Interest
- 1.American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer: Facts & Figures. 2007.Google Scholar
- 3.Natinal Cancer Institute. Probability of Breast Cancer in American Women. 2009. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/probability-breast-cancer. Published Last Modified Date|. Accessed May 2010|.
- 9.Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E, National Cancer Policy Board (U.S.). Committee on Cancer Survivorship: Improving Care and Quality of Life. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 15.Institute of Medicine. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington: National Academy Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 19.DxCG Inc. DxCG RiskSmart: Clinical Classifications Guide. Boston: DxCG; 2007.Google Scholar
- 22.Brown ML, Riley GF, Schussler N, Etzioni R. Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER-Medicare data. Med Care. 2002;40(8 Suppl):IV-104–17.Google Scholar
- 24.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: Recommendations and Rationale. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.Google Scholar
- 26.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. National Health Expenditures Fact Sheet: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2009.Google Scholar
- 35.Snyder CF, Frick KD, Kantsiper ME, et al. Prevention, screening, and surveillance care for breast cancer survivors compared with controls: changes from 1998 to 2002. J Clin Oncol. Jan 21 2009.Google Scholar
- 36.Snyder CF, Frick KD, Peairs KS, et al. Comparing care for breast cancer survivors to non-cancer controls: a five-year longitudinal study. J Gen Intern Med. Jan 21 2009.Google Scholar
- 38.Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2004. Bethesda, MD; 2007.Google Scholar