Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 954–961

“I Didn’t Know What Was Wrong:” How People With Undiagnosed Depression Recognize, Name and Explain Their Distress

  • Ronald M. Epstein
  • Paul R. Duberstein
  • Mitchell D. Feldman
  • Aaron B. Rochlen
  • Robert A. Bell
  • Richard L. Kravitz
  • Camille Cipri
  • Jennifer D. Becker
  • Patricia M. Bamonti
  • Debora A. Paterniti
Original Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic and treatment delay in depression are due to physician and patient factors. Patients vary in awareness of their depressive symptoms and ability to bring depression-related concerns to medical attention.

OBJECTIVE

To inform interventions to improve recognition and management of depression in primary care by understanding patients’ inner experiences prior to and during the process of seeking treatment.

DESIGN

Focus groups, analyzed qualitatively.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and sixteen adults (79% response) with personal or vicarious history of depression in Rochester NY, Austin TX and Sacramento CA. Neighborhood recruitment strategies achieved sociodemographic diversity.

APPROACH

Open-ended questions developed by a multidisciplinary team and refined in three pilot focus groups explored participants’ “lived experiences” of depression, depression-related beliefs, influences of significant others, and facilitators and barriers to care-seeking. Then, 12 focus groups stratified by gender and income were conducted, audio-recorded, and analyzed qualitatively using coding/editing methods.

MAIN RESULTS

Participants described three stages leading to engaging in care for depression — “knowing” (recognizing that something was wrong), “naming” (finding words to describe their distress) and “explaining” (seeking meaningful attributions). “Knowing” is influenced by patient personality and social attitudes. “Naming” is affected by incongruity between the personal experience of depression and its narrow clinical conceptualizations, colloquial use of the word depression, and stigma. “Explaining” is influenced by the media, socialization processes and social relations. Physical/medical explanations can appear to facilitate care-seeking, but may also have detrimental consequences. Other explanations (characterological, situational) are common, and can serve to either enhance or reduce blame of oneself or others.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve recognition of depression, primary care physicians should be alert to patients’ ill-defined distress and heterogeneous symptoms, help patients name their distress, and promote explanations that comport with patients’ lived experience, reduce blame and stigma, and facilitate care-seeking.

KEY WORDS

depression diagnosis interventions 

References

  1. 1.
    Kravitz RL, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, et al. Influence of patients' requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293:1995–2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lamb J. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. JAMA. 2000;284:1021–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lang F, Floyd MR, Beine KL. Clues to patients' explanations and concerns about their illnesses. A call for active listening. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:222–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Epstein RM, Hadee T, Carroll J, Meldrum SC, Lardner J, Shields CG. "Could this be something serious?" Physicians' responses to patients' expressions of worry and distress. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1731–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barbui C, Tansella M. Identification and management of depression in primary care settings. A meta-review of evidence. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2006;15:276–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Young AS, Klap R, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. The quality of care for depressive and anxiety disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:55–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harman JS, Edlund MJ, Fortney JC. Disparities in the adequacy of depression treatment in the United States. Psychiatr Serv. 2004;55:1379–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dwight-Johnson M, Sherbourne CD, Liao D, Wells KB. Treatment preferences among depressed primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:527–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen H, Jorm AF. Exploring the nature of stigmatising beliefs about depression and help-seeking: implications for reducing stigma. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldman LS, Nielsen NH, Champion HC. Awareness, diagnosis, and treatment of depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:569–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper-Patrick L, Powe NR, Jenckes MW, Gonzales JJ, Levine DM, Ford DE. Identification of patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment of depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:431–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohr DC, Hart SL, Howard I, et al. Barriers to psychotherapy among depressed and nondepressed primary care patients. Ann Behav Med. 2006;32:254–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kravitz RL, Paterniti DA, Epstein R, et al. Organizational and relational barriers to depression help-seeking in primary care: Qualitative Study. Ann Fam Med. 2009.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karasz A, Sacajiu G, Garcia N. Conceptual models of psychological distress among low-income patients in an inner-city primary care clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:475–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karasz A, Watkins L. Conceptual models of treatment in depressed Hispanic patients. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4:527–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karasz A. Cultural differences in conceptual models of depression. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1625–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feldman MD, Franks P, Duberstein PR, Vannoy S, Epstein R, Kravitz RL. Let's not talk about it: suicide inquiry in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:412–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rudebeck CE. General practice and the dialogue of clinical practice: On symptoms, symptom presentations, and bodily empathy. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992;Supplement:1–87.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Epstein RM, Quill TE, McWhinney IR. Somatization reconsidered: Incorporating the patient's experience of illness. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:215–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raue PJ, Schulberg HC, Heo M, Klimstra S, Bruce ML. Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome: a randomized primary care study. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:337–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Good BJ, Good MD. The Meaning of Symptoms: A Cultural Hermeneutic Model for Clinical Practice. In: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A, eds. The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.; 1981:165–96.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stoeckle JD, Barsky AJ. Attributions: Uses of Social Science Knowledge in the 'Doctoring' of Primary Care. In: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A, eds. The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.; 1981:223–40.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baumann LJ, Cameron LD, Zimmerman RS, Leventhal H. Illness representations and matching labels with symptoms. Health Psychol. 1989;8:449–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leventhal H, Diefenbach MA, Leventhal EA. Illness cognition: Using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16(2):143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Safer MA, Tharps QJ, Jackson TC, Leventhal H. Determinants of three stages of delay in seeking care at a medical clinic. Med Care. 1979;17:11–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karasz A. The development of valid subtypes for depression in primary care settings: a preliminary study using an explanatory model approach. J of Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196:289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice. 1982;19:276–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK. Linking theory, research, and practice. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997:19–35.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pescosolido BA. Beyond rational choice: The social dynamics of how people seek help. Am J Sociol. 1992;97:1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rochlen AB, Paterniti DA, Epstein RM, Duberstein P, Willeford L, Kravitz RL. Barriers in Diagnosing and Treating Men With Depression: A Focus Group Report. Am J Mens Health. 2009.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bell RA, Paterniti DA, Azari R, et al. Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: A mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:198–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Andersen R, Anderson OW, Smedby B. Perception of and response to symptoms of illness in Sweden and the United States. Med Care. 1968;6:18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wittink MN, Dahlberg B, Biruk C, Barg FK. How older adults combine medical and experiential notions of depression. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:1174–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lowe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Grafe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disorders. 2004;81:61–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald M. Epstein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul R. Duberstein
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mitchell D. Feldman
    • 4
  • Aaron B. Rochlen
    • 5
  • Robert A. Bell
    • 6
  • Richard L. Kravitz
    • 7
    • 8
  • Camille Cipri
    • 8
  • Jennifer D. Becker
    • 2
  • Patricia M. Bamonti
    • 3
  • Debora A. Paterniti
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
  1. 1.Departments of Family Medicine, Psychiatry and OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Rochester Center to Improve Communication in Health CareUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory of Personality and Development, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  4. 4.Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Educational PsychologyThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  6. 6.Department of Communication and Public Health SciencesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  7. 7.Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General MedicineUniversity of California Davis School of MedicineSacramentoUSA
  8. 8.Center for Healthcare Policy and ResearchUniversity of California Davis School of MedicineSacramentoUSA
  9. 9.Department of SociologyUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations