“I Didn’t Know What Was Wrong:” How People With Undiagnosed Depression Recognize, Name and Explain Their Distress
- 735 Downloads
Diagnostic and treatment delay in depression are due to physician and patient factors. Patients vary in awareness of their depressive symptoms and ability to bring depression-related concerns to medical attention.
To inform interventions to improve recognition and management of depression in primary care by understanding patients’ inner experiences prior to and during the process of seeking treatment.
Focus groups, analyzed qualitatively.
One hundred and sixteen adults (79% response) with personal or vicarious history of depression in Rochester NY, Austin TX and Sacramento CA. Neighborhood recruitment strategies achieved sociodemographic diversity.
Open-ended questions developed by a multidisciplinary team and refined in three pilot focus groups explored participants’ “lived experiences” of depression, depression-related beliefs, influences of significant others, and facilitators and barriers to care-seeking. Then, 12 focus groups stratified by gender and income were conducted, audio-recorded, and analyzed qualitatively using coding/editing methods.
Participants described three stages leading to engaging in care for depression — “knowing” (recognizing that something was wrong), “naming” (finding words to describe their distress) and “explaining” (seeking meaningful attributions). “Knowing” is influenced by patient personality and social attitudes. “Naming” is affected by incongruity between the personal experience of depression and its narrow clinical conceptualizations, colloquial use of the word depression, and stigma. “Explaining” is influenced by the media, socialization processes and social relations. Physical/medical explanations can appear to facilitate care-seeking, but may also have detrimental consequences. Other explanations (characterological, situational) are common, and can serve to either enhance or reduce blame of oneself or others.
To improve recognition of depression, primary care physicians should be alert to patients’ ill-defined distress and heterogeneous symptoms, help patients name their distress, and promote explanations that comport with patients’ lived experience, reduce blame and stigma, and facilitate care-seeking.
KEY WORDSdepression diagnosis interventions
- 13.Kravitz RL, Paterniti DA, Epstein R, et al. Organizational and relational barriers to depression help-seeking in primary care: Qualitative Study. Ann Fam Med. 2009.Google Scholar
- 18.Rudebeck CE. General practice and the dialogue of clinical practice: On symptoms, symptom presentations, and bodily empathy. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992;Supplement:1–87.Google Scholar
- 21.Good BJ, Good MD. The Meaning of Symptoms: A Cultural Hermeneutic Model for Clinical Practice. In: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A, eds. The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.; 1981:165–96.Google Scholar
- 22.Stoeckle JD, Barsky AJ. Attributions: Uses of Social Science Knowledge in the 'Doctoring' of Primary Care. In: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A, eds. The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co.; 1981:223–40.Google Scholar
- 30.Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK. Linking theory, research, and practice. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997:19–35.Google Scholar
- 33.Rochlen AB, Paterniti DA, Epstein RM, Duberstein P, Willeford L, Kravitz RL. Barriers in Diagnosing and Treating Men With Depression: A Focus Group Report. Am J Mens Health. 2009.Google Scholar
- 35.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar