Religious Hospitals and Primary Care Physicians: Conflicts over Policies for Patient Care
- 298 Downloads
Religiously affiliated hospitals provide nearly 20% of US beds, and many prohibit certain end-of-life and reproductive health treatments. Little is known about physician experiences in religious institutions.
Assess primary care physicians’ experiences and beliefs regarding conflict with religious hospital policies for patient care.
General internists, family physicians, and general practitioners from the AMA Masterfile.
In a questionnaire mailed in 2007, we asked physicians whether they had worked in a religiously affiliated hospital or practice, whether they had experienced conflict with the institution over religiously based patient care policies and how they believed physicians should respond to such conflicts. We used chi-square and multivariate logistic regression to examine associations between physicians’ demographic and religious characteristics and their responses.
Of 879 eligible physicians, 446 (51%) responded. In analyses adjusting for survey design, 43% had worked in a religiously affiliated institution. Among these, 19% had experienced conflict over religiously based policies. Most physicians (86%) believed when clinical judgment conflicts with religious hospital policy, physicians should refer patients to another institution. Compared with physicians ages 26–29 years, older physicians were less likely to have experienced conflict with religiously based policies [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) compared with 30–34 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.11); 35–46 years: 0.07 (0.01–0.72); 47–60 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.10)]. Compared with those who never attend religious services, those who do attend were less likely to have experienced conflict [attend once a month or less: odds ratio 0.06 (0.01–0.29); attend twice a month or more: 0.22 (0.05–0.98)]. Respondents with no religious affiliation were more likely than others to believe doctors should disregard religiously based policies that conflict with clinical judgment (13% vs. 3%; p = 0.005).
Hospitals and policy-makers may need to balance the competing claims of physician autonomy and religiously based institutional policies.
KEY WORDSreligion conscience primary care hospital policy health policy
- 1.Uttley LJ, Pawelko R. No strings attached: Public funding of religiously-sponsored hospitals in the United States. New York: MergerWatch; 2002.Google Scholar
- 2.United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Ethical and religious directives for Catholic health care services. 5th ed. Washington: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; 2009.Google Scholar
- 13.Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45 Part 88. Ensuring that Department of Health and Human Services Funds do Not Support Coercive Or Discriminatory Policies Or Practices in Violation of Federal Law. Available at http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title45/45cfr88_main_02.tpl. Accessed February 2, 2010.
- 14.Stein R. Health workers’ ‘conscience’ rule set to be voided. Washington Post. 2009(A01); Feb 28, 2009.Google Scholar
- 15.Hitt G. GOP antiabortion provision in health bill defeated. Wall Street Journal. 2009(A6), Oct 1.Google Scholar
- 16.Stein R. Workers’ religious freedom vs. patients’ rights. Washington Post. 2008(A01), July 31.Google Scholar
- 21.Hill PC, Hood RW, eds. Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Ala.: Religious Education Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 23.Groves RM, Fowler FJ Jr, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourageau R. Survey methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; 2004:326.Google Scholar
- 24.Uttley LJ. How merging religious and secular hospitals can threaten health care. Soc Policy. 2000;30(3):4–13.Google Scholar