Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 725–730

Religious Hospitals and Primary Care Physicians: Conflicts over Policies for Patient Care

  • Debra B. Stulberg
  • Ryan E. Lawrence
  • Jason Shattuck
  • Farr A. Curlin
Original Research

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1329-6

Cite this article as:
Stulberg, D.B., Lawrence, R.E., Shattuck, J. et al. J GEN INTERN MED (2010) 25: 725. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1329-6



Religiously affiliated hospitals provide nearly 20% of US beds, and many prohibit certain end-of-life and reproductive health treatments. Little is known about physician experiences in religious institutions.


Assess primary care physicians’ experiences and beliefs regarding conflict with religious hospital policies for patient care.


Cross-sectional survey.


General internists, family physicians, and general practitioners from the AMA Masterfile.


In a questionnaire mailed in 2007, we asked physicians whether they had worked in a religiously affiliated hospital or practice, whether they had experienced conflict with the institution over religiously based patient care policies and how they believed physicians should respond to such conflicts. We used chi-square and multivariate logistic regression to examine associations between physicians’ demographic and religious characteristics and their responses.


Of 879 eligible physicians, 446 (51%) responded. In analyses adjusting for survey design, 43% had worked in a religiously affiliated institution. Among these, 19% had experienced conflict over religiously based policies. Most physicians (86%) believed when clinical judgment conflicts with religious hospital policy, physicians should refer patients to another institution. Compared with physicians ages 26–29 years, older physicians were less likely to have experienced conflict with religiously based policies [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) compared with 30–34 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.11); 35–46 years: 0.07 (0.01–0.72); 47–60 years: 0.02 (0.00–0.10)]. Compared with those who never attend religious services, those who do attend were less likely to have experienced conflict [attend once a month or less: odds ratio 0.06 (0.01–0.29); attend twice a month or more: 0.22 (0.05–0.98)]. Respondents with no religious affiliation were more likely than others to believe doctors should disregard religiously based policies that conflict with clinical judgment (13% vs. 3%; p = 0.005).


Hospitals and policy-makers may need to balance the competing claims of physician autonomy and religiously based institutional policies.


religion conscience primary care hospital policy health policy 

Supplementary material

11606_2010_1329_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (410 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 410 kb)

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debra B. Stulberg
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ryan E. Lawrence
    • 4
  • Jason Shattuck
    • 5
  • Farr A. Curlin
    • 3
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Section of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.MacLean Center for Clinical Medical EthicsThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Pritzker School of MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  5. 5.Internal Medicine/PediatricsWenatchee Valley Medical CenterWenatcheeUSA
  6. 6.Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineThe University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations