Electronic Prescribing Improves Medication Safety in Community-Based Office Practices
- First Online:
- 1.3k Downloads
Although electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) holds promise for preventing prescription errors in the ambulatory setting, research on its effectiveness is inconclusive.
To assess the impact of a stand-alone e-prescribing system on the rates and types of ambulatory prescribing errors.
Prospective, non-randomized study using pre-post design of 15 providers who adopted e-prescribing with concurrent controls of 15 paper-based providers from September 2005 through June 2007.
Use of a commercial, stand-alone e-prescribing system with clinical decision support including dosing recommendations and checks for drug-allergy interactions, drug-drug interactions, and duplicate therapies.
Prescribing errors were identified by a standardized prescription and chart review.
We analyzed 3684 paper-based prescriptions at baseline and 3848 paper-based and electronic prescriptions at one year of follow-up. For e-prescribing adopters, error rates decreased nearly sevenfold, from 42.5 per 100 prescriptions (95% confidence interval (CI), 36.7–49.3) at baseline to 6.6 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 5.1–8.3) one year after adoption (p < 0.001). For non-adopters, error rates remained high at 37.3 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 27.6–50.2) at baseline and 38.4 per 100 prescriptions (95% CI, 27.4–53.9) at one year (p = 0.54). At one year, the error rate for e-prescribing adopters was significantly lower than for non-adopters (p < 0.001). Illegibility errors were very high at baseline and were completely eliminated by e-prescribing (87.6 per 100 prescriptions at baseline for e-prescribing adopters, 0 at one year).
Prescribing errors may occur much more frequently in community-based practices than previously reported. Our preliminary findings suggest that stand-alone e-prescribing with clinical decision support may significantly improve ambulatory medication safety.
ClinicalTrials.gov, Taconic Health Information Network and Community (THINC), NCT00225563, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00225563?term=Kaushal&rank=6.
KEY WORDSelectronic prescribing ambulatory medication safety
- 2.American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Accessed December 4, 2009, at http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/
- 4.eHealth Initiative foundation. A clinician’s guide to electronic prescribing. Washington, D.C.: eHealth Initiative Foundation, 2008.Google Scholar
- 11.Grossman JM, Reed MC. Clinical information technology gaps persist among physicians. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change 2006:1–4.Google Scholar
- 14.Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS, Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
- 15.Bates DW, Kaushal R, Keohane CA, Cook EF. Center of Excellence for Patient Safety Research and Practice Terminology Training Manual. 2005:1–21.Google Scholar
- 21.Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 summary. Natl Health Stat Report 2008:1–39Google Scholar
- 22.Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008. S3101.Google Scholar
- 24.Bell DS, Marken RS, Meili RC, Wang CJ, Rosen M, Brook RH. Recommendations for comparing electronic prescribing systems: results of an expert consensus process. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-305–17.Google Scholar
- 26.Health information service provider (HSP). 2008. (Accessed December, 2009, at www.nyehealth.org/glossary/term/19.)