Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 340–344 | Cite as

Interactive Voice Response Technology Can Deliver Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Primary Care

  • Gail L. Rose
  • Charles D. MacLean
  • Joan Skelly
  • Gary J. Badger
  • Tonya A. Ferraro
  • John E. Helzer
Original Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alcohol screening and brief intervention (BI) is an effective primary care preventive service, but implementation rates are low. Automating BI using interactive voice response (IVR) may be an efficient way to expand patient access to needed information and advice.

OBJECTIVE

To develop IVR-based BI and pilot test it for feasibility and acceptability.

DESIGN

Single-group pre-post feasibility study.

PARTICIPANTS

Primary care patients presenting for an office visit.

INTERVENTIONS

IVR-BI structured to correspond to the provider BI method recommended by NIAAA: (1) Ask about use; (2) Assess problems; (3) Advise and Assist for change, and (4) Follow up for continued support. Advice was tailored to patient readiness and preferences.

MEASUREMENTS

Utilization rate, call duration, and patients’ subjective reports of usefulness, comfort and honesty with the IVR-BI. Pre-post evaluation of motivation to change and change in alcohol consumption as measured by Timeline Follow Back.

RESULTS

Call duration ranged from 3–7 minutes. Subjective reactions were generally positive or neutral. About 40% of subjects indicated IVR-BI had motivated them to change. About half of the patients had discussed drinking with their provider at the visit. These tended to be heavier drinkers with greater concerns about drinking. Patients who reported a provider-delivered BI and called the IVR-BI endorsed greater comfort and honesty with the IVR-BI. On average, a 25% reduction in alcohol use was reported two weeks after the clinic visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Using IVR technology to deliver BI in a primary care setting is feasible and data suggest potential for efficacy in a larger trial.

KEY WORDS

alcohol screening brief intervention primary care IVR technology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Megan Malgeri in gathering the IVR-screen pre-test data.

We also would like to thank Dee Scheidel and all the staff at Given Essex for collaborating on this study.

This research was supported by NIAAA grant 1 R21 AA015777-01A1.

An abstract of this study was presented at a poster session at the Society of General Internal Medicine annual meeting, Miami, FL, May, 2009. This research was also presented as part of a symposium at the Research Society on Alcoholism annual meeting, San Diego, CA, June, 2009.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Supplementary material

11606_2009_1233_MOESM1_ESM.doc (38 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 37 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Maciosek MV, Edwards NM, Coffield AB, Flottemesch TJ, Nelson WW, Goodman MJ. Solberg, ML. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: methods. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(1):90–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):554–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bien TH, Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. Addiction. 1993;88(3):315–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleming MF, Mundt MP, French MT, Manwell LB, Stauffacher EA, Barry KL. Brief physician advice for problem drinkers: long-term efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26(1):36–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaner EF, Beyer F, Dickinson HO, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. [Review] [93 refs]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):CD004148.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moyer A, Finney JW, Swearingen CE, Vergun P. Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. Addiction. 2002;97(3):279–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, Orleans T, Klein J. Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):557–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA). Missed opportunity: CASA national survey of primary care physicians and patients on substance abuse. New York: Columbia University; 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spandorfer JM, Israel Y, Turner BJ. Primary care physicians' views on screening and management of alcohol abuse: inconsistencies with national guidelines. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(11):899–902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaner EF, Heather N, Brodie J, Lock CA, McAvoy BR. Patient and practitioner characteristics predict brief alcohol intervention in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(471):822–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lock CA, Kaner EF. Implementation of brief alcohol interventions by nurses in primary care: do non-clinical factors influence practice? Fam Pract. 2004;21(3):270–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Volk RJ, Steinbauer JR, Cantor SB. Patient factors influencing variation in the use of preventive interventions for alcohol abuse by primary care physicians. J Stud Alcohol. 1996;57(2):203–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beich A, Gannik D, Malterud K. Screening and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use: qualitative interview study of the experiences of general practitioners. BMJ. 2002;325(7369):870–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCormick KA, Cochran NE, Back AL, Merrill JO, Williams EC, Bradley KA. How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(9):966–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bewick BM, Trusler K, Barkham M, Hill AJ, Cahill J, Mulhern B. The effectiveness of web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption-a systematic review. Prev Med. 2008;47(1):17–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kypri K, Langley JD, Saunders JB, Cashell-Smith ML, Herbison P. Randomized controlled trial of web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):530–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perrine MW, Mundt JC, Searles JS, Lester LS. Validation of daily self-reported alcohol consumption using interactive voice response (IVR) technology. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56:487–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Searles JS, Helzer JE, Walter DE. Comparison of drinking patterns measured by daily reports and timeline follow back. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000;14(3):277–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Helzer JE, Badger GJ, Rose GL, Mongeon JA, Searles JS. Decline in alcohol consumption during two years of daily reporting. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63(5):551–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mundt JC, Moore HK, Bean P. An interactive voice response program to reduce drinking relapse: a feasibility study. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30(1):21–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tucker JA, Foushee HR, Black BC. Behavioral economic analysis of natural resolution of drinking problems using IVR self-monitoring. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;16(4):332–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Forster AJ, Boyle L, Shojania KG, Feasby TE, van Walraven C. Identifying patients with post-discharge care problems using an interactive voice response system. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):520–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kranzler HR, Abu-Hasaballah K, Tennen H, Feinn R, Young K. Using daily interactive voice response technology to measure drinking and related behaviors in a pharmacotherapy study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28(7):1060–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simpson TL, Kivlahan DR, Bush KR, McFall ME. Telephone self-monitoring among alcohol use disorder patients in early recovery: a randomized study of feasibility and measurement reactivity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79(2):241–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Helzer JE, Rose GL, Badger GJ, Searles JS, Thomas CS, Lindberg SA, et al. Using interactive voice response to enhance brief alcohol intervention in primary care settings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(2):251–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reid RD, Pipe AL, Quinlan B, Oda J. Interactive voice response telephony to promote smoking cessation in patients with heart disease: a pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(3):319–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hall JA, Huber DL. Telephone management in substance abuse treatment. Telemed J E Health. 2000;6(4):401–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT-The alcohol use disorders identification test$ Guidelines for use in primary health care. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Institute of Alcohol and Alcohol Abuse. Helping Patients With Alcohol Problems: A Clinician’s Guide. Bethesda: NIH: the Institute; 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(7):1208–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen JP, eds. Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biochemical methods. Totowa: Humana Press; 1992:41–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gail L. Rose
    • 1
  • Charles D. MacLean
    • 1
  • Joan Skelly
    • 1
  • Gary J. Badger
    • 1
  • Tonya A. Ferraro
    • 1
  • John E. Helzer
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations