A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research on the Meaning and Characteristics of Mentoring in Academic Medicine
- 4.1k Downloads
Mentorship is perceived to play a significant role in the career development and productivity of academic clinicians, but little is known about the characteristics of mentorship. This knowledge would be useful for those developing mentorship programs.
To complete a systematic review of the qualitative literature to explore and summarize the development, perceptions and experiences of the mentoring relationship in academic medicine.
Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Current Contents databases from the earliest available date to December 2008.
We included studies that used qualitative research methodology to explore the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Two investigators independently assessed articles for relevance and study quality, and extracted data using standardized forms. No restrictions were placed on the language of articles.
A total of 8,487 citations were identified, 114 full text articles were assessed, and 9 articles were selected for review. All studies were conducted in North America, and most focused on the initiation and cultivation phases of the mentoring relationship. Mentoring was described as a complex relationship based on mutual interests, both professional and personal. Mentees should take an active role in the formation and development of mentoring relationships. Good mentors should be sincere in their dealings with mentees, be able to listen actively and understand mentees' needs, and have a well-established position within the academic community. Some of the mentoring functions aim at the mentees’ academic growth and others at personal growth. Barriers to mentoring and dysfunctional mentoring can be related to personal factors, relational difficulties and structural/institutional barriers.
Successful mentoring requires commitment and interpersonal skills of the mentor and mentee, but also a facilitating environment at academic medicine's institutions.
KEY WORDSmentoring academic medicine systematic review qualitative research
We thank Ms Laure Perrier for her help in designing search strategies and retrieval of articles. Dr Sambunjak and Dr Marušić are financially supported in part by a grant from the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports (no. 216-1080314-0245) to Matko Marušić. Dr. Straus was supported by a Canada Research Chair.
Conflict of interest
The funders had no influence on the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. All of the authors are teachers at medical schools and have no competing interests.
- 1.Kram KE. Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, Il: Scott Foresman; 1985.Google Scholar
- 4.Hall JC. Mentoring and young people: a literature review. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2003.Google Scholar
- 10.Standing Committee on Post-graduate Medical and Dental Education. An enquiry into mentoring supporting doctors and dentists at work. London: SCOPME; 1998.Google Scholar
- 13.Rodenhauser P, Rudisill JR, Dvorak R. Skills for mentors and protégés applicable to psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2000;24:14–27.Google Scholar
- 16.Mishler EG. Meaning in context: is there any other kind? Harv Educ Rev. 1979;49:1–19.Google Scholar
- 17.Healy CC, Welchert AJ. Mentoring relations: a definition to advance research and education. Educ Res. 1990;19:17–21.Google Scholar
- 20.Nicholas DB, Globerman J, Antle BJ, McNeill T, Lach LM. Processes of metastudy: a study of psychosocial adaptation to childhood chronic health conditions. International journal of qualitative methods. 2006;5(1), Article 5. Retrieved: August 3rd 2009 from http://www.ualberta.ca/∼iiqm/backissues/5_1/PDF/NICHOLAS.PDF (Accessed October 2009).
- 21.Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
- 32.Godshalk VM, Sosik JJ. Mentoring and leadership. In: Ragins BR, Kram KE, eds. The handbook of mentoring at work: theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007.Google Scholar
- 34.Townsend KC, McWhirter BT. Connectedness: a review of the literature with implications for counseling, assessment and research. J Couns Dev. 2005;83:191–201.Google Scholar
- 35.Eby LT. Understanding relational problems in mentoring: a review and proposed investment model. In: Kram KE, Ragins BR, eds. The handbook of mentoring at work: theory, research, and practice. Los Angeles: Sage; 2007.Google Scholar