Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 72–78

A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research on the Meaning and Characteristics of Mentoring in Academic Medicine

Original Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mentorship is perceived to play a significant role in the career development and productivity of academic clinicians, but little is known about the characteristics of mentorship. This knowledge would be useful for those developing mentorship programs.

OBJECTIVE

To complete a systematic review of the qualitative literature to explore and summarize the development, perceptions and experiences of the mentoring relationship in academic medicine.

DATE SOURCES

Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Current Contents databases from the earliest available date to December 2008.

REVIEW METHODS

We included studies that used qualitative research methodology to explore the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Two investigators independently assessed articles for relevance and study quality, and extracted data using standardized forms. No restrictions were placed on the language of articles.

RESULTS

A total of 8,487 citations were identified, 114 full text articles were assessed, and 9 articles were selected for review. All studies were conducted in North America, and most focused on the initiation and cultivation phases of the mentoring relationship. Mentoring was described as a complex relationship based on mutual interests, both professional and personal. Mentees should take an active role in the formation and development of mentoring relationships. Good mentors should be sincere in their dealings with mentees, be able to listen actively and understand mentees' needs, and have a well-established position within the academic community. Some of the mentoring functions aim at the mentees’ academic growth and others at personal growth. Barriers to mentoring and dysfunctional mentoring can be related to personal factors, relational difficulties and structural/institutional barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful mentoring requires commitment and interpersonal skills of the mentor and mentee, but also a facilitating environment at academic medicine's institutions.

KEY WORDS

mentoring academic medicine systematic review qualitative research 

Supplementary material

11606_2009_1165_MOESM1_ESM.doc (46 kb)
Appendix 1(DOC 46 kb)
11606_2009_1165_MOESM2_ESM.doc (34 kb)
Appendix 2(DOC 34 kb)
11606_2009_1165_MOESM3_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Appendix 3(DOC 52 kb)
11606_2009_1165_MOESM4_ESM.doc (99 kb)
Appendix 4(DOC 99 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kram KE. Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, Il: Scott Foresman; 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psycho. 2004;89:127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Underhill CM. The effectiveness of mentoring programs in corporate settings: a meta-analytical review of the literature. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68:292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hall JC. Mentoring and young people: a literature review. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansford BC, Ehrich LC, Tennent L. Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: a review of the literature. Educ Adm Q. 2004;40:518–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dorsey LE, Baker CM. Mentoring undergraduate nursing students: assessing the state of the science. Nurse Educ. 2004;29:260–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine. ICRAM (The International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine): agenda setting. BMJ. 2004;329:787–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sambunjak D, Straus S, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1103–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buddeberg-Fischer B, Herta KD. Formal mentoring programmes for medical students and doctors—a review of the Medline literature. Med Teach. 2006;28:248–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Standing Committee on Post-graduate Medical and Dental Education. An enquiry into mentoring supporting doctors and dentists at work. London: SCOPME; 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berk RA, Berg J, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo TP. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2005;80:66–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhagia J, Tinsley JA. The mentoring partnership. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:535–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodenhauser P, Rudisill JR, Dvorak R. Skills for mentors and protégés applicable to psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2000;24:14–27.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Detsky AS, Baerlocher MO. Academic mentoring—how to give it and how to get it. JAMA. 2007;297:2134–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barondess JA. On mentoring. J R Soc Med. 1997;90:347–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mishler EG. Meaning in context: is there any other kind? Harv Educ Rev. 1979;49:1–19.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Healy CC, Welchert AJ. Mentoring relations: a definition to advance research and education. Educ Res. 1990;19:17–21.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen LA, Allen MN. A synthesis of qualitative research on wellness-illness. Qual Health Res. 1994;4:349–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bondas T, Hall EOC. Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nicholas DB, Globerman J, Antle BJ, McNeill T, Lach LM. Processes of metastudy: a study of psychosocial adaptation to childhood chronic health conditions. International journal of qualitative methods. 2006;5(1), Article 5. Retrieved: August 3rd 2009 from http://www.ualberta.ca/∼iiqm/backissues/5_1/PDF/NICHOLAS.PDF (Accessed October 2009).
  21. 21.
    Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bates MJ. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Rev. 1989;13:407–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benson CA, Morahan PS, Sachdeva AK, Richman RC. Effective faculty preceptoring and mentoring during reorganization of an academic medical center. Med Teach. 2002;24:550–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hauer KE, Teherani A, Dechet A, Aagaard EM. Medical students' perceptions of mentoring: a focus-group analysis. Med Teach. 2005;27:732–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:328–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koopman RJ, Thiedke CC. Views of family medicine department Chairs about mentoring junior faculty. Med Teach. 2005;27:734–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leslie K, Lingard L, Whyte S. Junior faculty experiences with informal mentoring. Med Teach. 2005;27:693–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morzinski JA, Dier S, Bower DJ, Simpson DE. A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty. Fam Med. 1996;28:434–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rabatin JS, Lipkin M, Rubin AS, Schachter A, Nathan M, Kalet A. A year of mentoring in academic medicine: case report and qualitative analysis of 15 hours of meetings between a junior and senior faculty member. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:569–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Williams LL, Levine JB, Malhotra S, Holtzheimer P. The good-enough mentoring relationship. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28:111–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor-mentee relationship in academic medicine: qualitative study. Acad Med. 2009;84:135–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Godshalk VM, Sosik JJ. Mentoring and leadership. In: Ragins BR, Kram KE, eds. The handbook of mentoring at work: theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    D'Abate CP, Eddy ER, Tannenbaum SI. What's in a name? A literature-based approach to understanding mentoring, coaching and constructs that describe developmental interactions. Human Resource Development Review. 2003;2:360–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Townsend KC, McWhirter BT. Connectedness: a review of the literature with implications for counseling, assessment and research. J Couns Dev. 2005;83:191–201.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eby LT. Understanding relational problems in mentoring: a review and proposed investment model. In: Kram KE, Ragins BR, eds. The handbook of mentoring at work: theory, research, and practice. Los Angeles: Sage; 2007.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Atkinson P, Pugsley L. Making sense of ethnography and medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39:228–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40:101–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kram KE. Phases of the mentor relationship. Acad Manag J. 1983;26:608–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dario Sambunjak
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sharon E. Straus
    • 3
  • Ana Marusic
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Croatian Medical JournalZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.University of Zagreb School of MedicineZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of AnatomyUniversity of Split School of MedicineSplitCroatia

Personalised recommendations