The Vermont Diabetes Information System: A Cluster Randomized Trial of a Population Based Decision Support System
- First Online:
- 229 Downloads
Optimal care for patients with diabetes is difficult to achieve in clinical practice.
To evaluate the impact of a registry and decision support system on processes of care, and physiologic control.
Randomized trial with clustering at the practice level, involving 7,412 adults with diabetes in 64 primary care practices in the Northeast.
Provider decision support (reminders for overdue diabetes tests, alerts regarding abnormal results, and quarterly population reports with peer comparisons) and patient decision support (reminders and alerts).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Process and physiologic outcomes were evaluated in all subjects. Functional status was evaluated in a random patient sample via questionnaire. We used multiple logistic regression to quantify the effect, adjusting for clustering and potential confounders. Intervention subjects were significantly more likely to receive guideline-appropriate testing for cholesterol (OR = 1.39; [95%CI 1.07, 1.80] P = 0.012), creatinine (OR = 1.40; [95%CI 1.06, 1.84] P = 0.018), and proteinuria (OR = 1.74; [95%CI 1.13, 1.69] P = 0.012), but not A1C (OR = 1.17; [95% CI 0.80, 1.72] P = 0.43). Rates of control of A1C and LDL cholesterol were similar in the two groups. There were no differences in blood pressure, body mass index, or functional status.
A chronic disease registry and decision support system based on easily obtainable laboratory data was feasible and acceptable to patients and providers. This system improved the process of laboratory monitoring in primary care, but not physiologic control.
KEY WORDSdiabetes mellitus decision support systems, clinical patient care management chronic disease health services research primary health care human randomized controlled trial adult
- 17.Cherry DK, Hing E, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA. National ambulatory medical care survey: 2006 summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;(3):1–39.Google Scholar
- 20.MacLean CD, Littenberg B, Gagnon MS, Reardon M, Turner PD, Jordan C. The Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS): study design and subject recruitment for a cluster randomized trial of a decision support system in a regional sample of primary care practices. Clinical Trials. 2004;1:532–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2006. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(Suppl 1):S4–42.Google Scholar
- 27.Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey. Lincoln: QualityMetric Inc.; 2003.Google Scholar
- 33.Machlin CR, Carper K. Expenses for a hospital emergency room visit, 2003. AHRQ statistical brief #111. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/datafiles/publications/st111/stat111.pdf. Accessed September 29, 2009.
- 34.Machlin CR, Carper K. Expenses for office-based physician visits by specialty, 2004. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/datafiles/publications/st166/stat166.pdf. Accessed September 29, 2009.
- 35.Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. 2005 Hospital Inpatient Stays, 2007. (October 2007). http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/datastats/downloaddatafilesdetail.jsp?cboPufNumber=HC-094D. Accessed September 29, 2009.
- 36.Brown H, Prescott R. Applied mixed models in medicine. 2nd ed. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2006.Google Scholar
- 37.Murray DM. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
- 38.Piantadosi S. Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1997.Google Scholar
- 39.Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update. Stata Journal. 2005;5(2):188–201.Google Scholar
- 43.US Census. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States:2003. http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/p60-226.pdf. Accessed September 29, 2009.
- 44.US Census. Health Insurance Coverage Status and Type of Coverage by State and Age for All People:2004. http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032005/health/h05000.htm. Accessed September 29, 2009.
- 45.Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, Wagner EH, Eijk JT, Assendelft WJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD001481.Google Scholar
- 55.American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American Osteopathic Association. Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home. March 2007. http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/wherewestand/medicalhome/approvejp.pdf. Accessed September 29, 2009.
- 56.Batalden PB, Godfrey MM, Nelson EC. Quality by Design: A Clinical Microsystems Approach1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.Google Scholar
- 57.MacLean CD, Littenberg B. Patient assignment in a diabetes decision support system: implications for population management and pay for performance. Society of General Internal Medicine. Pittsburgh; 2008.Google Scholar