Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Supplement 1, pp 44–49

Use of Health Information Technology to Advance Evidence-Based Care: Lessons from the VA QUERI Program

  • Denise M. Hynes
  • Timothy Weddle
  • Nina Smith
  • Erika Whittier
  • David Atkins
  • Joseph Francis
Original Article



As the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development Service’s Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) has progressed, health information technology (HIT) has occupied a crucial role in implementation research projects.


We evaluated the role of HIT in VA QUERI implementation research, including HIT use and development, the contributions implementation research has made to HIT development, and HIT-related barriers and facilitators to implementation research.


Key informants from nine disease-specific QUERI Centers.


Documentation analysis of 86 implementation project abstracts followed up by semi-structured interviews with key informants from each of the nine QUERI centers. We used qualitative and descriptive analyses.


We found: (1) HIT provided data and information to facilitate implementation research, (2) implementation research helped to further HIT development in a variety of uses including the development of clinical decision support systems (23 of 86 implementation research projects), and (3) common HIT barriers to implementation research existed but could be overcome by collaborations with clinical and administrative leadership.


Our review of the implementation research progress in the VA revealed interdependency on an HIT infrastructure and research-based development. Collaboration with multiple stakeholders is a key factor in successful use and development of HIT in implementation research efforts and in advancing evidence-based practice.


data health information technology quality enhancement research initiative implementation research veterans health administration 


  1. 1.
    Damberg CL, Ridgely SM, Shaw R, Meili RC, Sorbero MES, Bradley LA, Farley DO. Adopting information technology to drive improvements in patient safety: lessons from the agency for healthcare research and quality health information technology grantees [article]. Health Serv Res. 2009;44(2):684–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, Girosi F, Meili R, Scoville R, Taylor R. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahensky JA, Jaana M, Ward MM. Health care information technology in rural America: electronic medical record adoption status in meeting the national agenda. J Rural Health. 2008;24(2):101–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poon EG, Jha AK, Christino M, Honour MM, Fernandopulle R, Middleton B, Newhouse J, Leape L, Bates DW, Blumenthal D, et al. Assessing the level of healthcare information technology adoption in the United States: a snapshot. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, Donelan K, Ferris TG, Jha A, Kaushal R, Levy DE, Rosenbaum S, Shields AE, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care–a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fihn S. Moving implementation science forward. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(Suppl 2):S65–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hynes DM, Perrin RA, Rappaport S, Stevens JM, Demakis JG. Informatics resources to support health care quality improvement in the veterans health administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:344–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fremont A, Joyce G, Anaya H, et al. An HIV collaborative in the VHA: do advanced HIT and 1-day sessions change the collaborative experience? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:324–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradley KA, Williams EC, Achtmeyer CE, Volpp B, Collins BJ, Kivlahan DR. Implementation of evidence-based alcohol screening in the Veterans Health Administration. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12:597–606Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owen R, Thrush C, Cannon D, et al. Use of electronic medical record data for quality improvement in schizophrenia treatment. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:351–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Young A, Mints J, Cohen A, Chinman M. A network-based system to improve care for schizophrenia: the Medical Informatics Network Tool (MINT). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:358–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dobscha S, Corson K, Hickam D, Perrin N, Kraemer D, Gerrity M. Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:477–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fortney J, Pyne J, Edlund M, Robinson D, Mittal D, Henderson K. Design and implementation of the telemedicine-enhanced antidepressant management study. Gen Hosp Psych. 2006;28:18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McQueen L, Mittman BS, Demakis JG. Overview of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:339–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Demakis JG, McQueen L, Kizer KW, Feussner JR. Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI): a collaboration between research and clinical practice. Med Care. 2000;38(suppl I):I17–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saleem J, Patterson E, Militello L, Render L, Orshansky G, Asche S. Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:438–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bradley KA, DeBenedetti A, Volk R, Williams E, Frank D, Kivlahan DR. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1208–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldstein MK, Coleman RW, Tu SW, et al. Translating research into practice: organizational issues in implementing automated decision support for hypertension in three medical centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:368–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Willenbring ML, Hagedorn HJ, Postier AC, Kenny M. Variations in evidence-based clinical practices in nine United States Veterans Administration opioid agonist therapy clinics. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;75:97–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development. Telephone care coordination to improve smoking cessation counseling. Available at: Accessed March 12, 2009.
  21. 21.
    Sherman SE, Takahashi N, Kalra P, Gifford E, Finney JW, Canfield J, Kelly JF, Joseph GJ, Kuschner W. Care coordination to increase referrals to smoking cessation telephone counseling: a demonstration project. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(3):141–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Veterans Health Administration, Office of Care Coordination. Telehealth. Available at: Accessed March 12, 2009.
  23. 23.
    Box T, et al. The CART story: facilitators and barriers to successful HIT implementation. Submitted to J Gen Intern Med.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goetz M, Bowman C, Hoang T, et al. Implementing and evaluating a regional strategy to improve testing rates in VA patients at risk for HIV, utilizing the QUERI process as a guiding framework. Implement Sci. 2008;3:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kupersmith J, Francis J, Kerr E, et al. Advancing evidence-based care for diabetes: lessons from the Veterans Health Administration. Health Aff. 2007;26:156–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wagner TH, Bhandari A, Chadwick GL, Nelson DK. The cost of operating institutional review boards. Acad Med. 2003;78:638–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nagykaldi Z, Mold J. The role of health information technology in the translation of research into practice: An Oklahoma physicians resource/research network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20:188–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Doebbeling BN, Chou AF, Tierney WM. Priorities and strategies for the implementation of integrated informatics and communications technology to improve evidence-based practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(Suppl 2):S50–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kho A, Zafar A, Tierney W. Information technology in PBRNs: the Indiana University Medical Group Research Network (IUMG ResNet) experience. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(2):196–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:742–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baron RJ, Fabens EL, Schiffman M, Wolf E. Electronic health records: just around the corner? Or over the cliff? Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:222–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Young AS, Chaney E, Shoal R, Bonner L, Cohen AN, Doebbling B, Dorr D, Goldstein MK, Kerr E, Nichol P, Perrin R. Information technology to support improved care for chronic illness. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;(Suppl 3):425–30.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise M. Hynes
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Timothy Weddle
    • 1
  • Nina Smith
    • 4
  • Erika Whittier
    • 1
  • David Atkins
    • 5
  • Joseph Francis
    • 6
  1. 1.VA Information Resource CenterEdward Hines, Jr. VA HospitalHinesUSA
  2. 2.Center for Management of Complex Chronic CareEdward Hines, Jr. VA HospitalHinesUSA
  3. 3.College of Medicine and School of Public HealthUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Health Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans AffairsWashingtonUSA
  6. 6.Office of Quality and Performance, Department of Veterans AffairsWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations