Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 57–60 | Cite as

Examining Faculty Awards for Gender Equity and Evolving Values

  • Stephanie Abbuhl
  • Mirar N. Bristol
  • Hera Ashfaq
  • Patricia Scott
  • Lucy Wolf Tuton
  • Anne R. Cappola
  • Seema S. Sonnad
Perspectives

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Awards given to medical school faculty are one important mechanism for recognizing what is valued in academic medicine. There have been concerns expressed about the gender distribution of awards, and there is also a growing appreciation for the evolving accomplishments and talents that define academic excellence in the 21st century and that should be considered worthy of award recognition.

OBJECTIVE

Examine faculty awards at our institution for gender equity and evolving values.

METHODS

Recipient data were collected on awards from 1996 to 2007 inclusively at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (SOM). Descriptions of each award also were collected. The female-to-male ratio of award recipients over the time span was reviewed for changes and trends. The title and text of each award announcement were reviewed to determine if the award represented a traditional or a newer concept of excellence in academic medicine.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 21 annual awards given to a total of 59 clinical award recipients, 60 research award recipients, and 154 teaching award recipients. Women received 28% of research awards, 29% of teaching awards and 10% of clinical awards. Gender distribution of total awards was similar to that of SOM full-time faculty except in the clinical awards category. Only one award reflected a shift in the culture of individual achievement to one of collaboration and team performance.

CONCLUSION

Examining both the recipients and content of awards is important to assure they reflect the current composition of diverse faculty and the evolving ideals of leadership and excellence in academic medicine.

KEY WORDS

faculty awards gender equity female-to-male ratio leadership excellence 

References

  1. 1.
    Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR). The Raise Project. Available at: http://www.raiseproject.org/faq.php. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
  2. 2.
    Handelsman J, Grymes RA. Looking for a few good women? (Editorial). DNA and Cell Biology. 2008;27:463–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carnes M, Bland C. Viewpoint: A challenge to academic health centers and the national institutes of health to prevent unintended gender bias in the selection of clinical and translational science award leaders. Acad Med. 2007;82:202–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mervis J, National Institutes of Health. Male sweep of new award raises questions of bias. Science. 2004;306(5696):595.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dolphin AC. Gender: missing the prizes that can inspire a career. Nature. 2006;442(7105):868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singer M. Beyond bias and barriers. Science. 2006;314(5801):893.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR). The Raise Project. Available at: http://www.raiseproject.org/faq.php. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
  8. 8.
    Kuhn GJ, Abbuhl SB, Clem KJ. Recommendations from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Taskforce on Women in Academic Emergency Medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(8):762–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirch DG. Culture and the courage to change. AAMC 2007 Annual Meeting: President's Address: American Association of Medical Colleges; 2007. Available from: http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/pressrel/2007/2007presidentsaddress.pdf. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
  10. 10.
    Souba WW. The New Leader: New demands in a changing, turbulent environment. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:79–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001:25.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carroll JS, Quijada MA. Redirecting traditional professional values to support safety:changing organizational culture in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(suppl II):ii16–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zerhouni E. The NIH Roadmap. Science. 2003;302:63–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    AAMC Faculty Vitae for the table of traditional vs emerging words by Kirch, GJ. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/members/facultydev/facultyvitae/summer08/feature.htm. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
  15. 15.
    FOCUS. FOCUS Benchmarks: Gender Statistics. Available at: http://www.med.upenn.edu/focus/Benchmarks.shtml. Accessed 7/21, 2009.
  16. 16.
    Eagly AHK, Steven J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev. 2002;109:573–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ridgeway CL. Gender, status and leadership. J Soc Issues. 2001;57:637–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heilman M. Description and prescription: how gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J Soc Issues. 2001;57:657–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uhlmann EL, Cohen GL. Constructed criteria: redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:474–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):711–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Christmas C, Kravet SJ, Durso SC, Wright SM. Clinical Excellence in Academia: Perspectives From Masterful Academic Clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:989–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levinson W, Rubenstein A. Mission critical—integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(11):840–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, Hampton CL. Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine: results of a survey. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2625–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lucey CR. Promotion for Clinician-educators; Time for a fresh approach? (editorial). J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):768–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson B, et al. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Acad Med. 2002;77:1043–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gjerberg E, Kjolsrod L. The doctor-nurse relationship: how easy is it to be a female doctor cooperating with a female nurse? Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:189–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Freeman R, Weinstein E, Marincola E, Rosenbaum J, Solomon F. Competition and careers in biosciences. Science. 2001;294:2293–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Academic Physician & Scientist. An interview with Darryl Kirch, president and CEO of the AAMC. Academic Physician and Scientist, 2008.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carr PL, Bickel J, Inui T, eds. A Resource Guide for Medical Faculty. Boston University School of Medicine; 2003.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science-time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1621–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Abbuhl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mirar N. Bristol
    • 3
  • Hera Ashfaq
    • 4
  • Patricia Scott
    • 2
  • Lucy Wolf Tuton
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Anne R. Cappola
    • 2
    • 8
  • Seema S. Sonnad
    • 9
    • 10
  1. 1.Emergency MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.FOCUS on Health & Leadership for WomenUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Division of Medicine, Department of General Internal MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of CardiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  6. 6.Prevention and Population Health in the Department of Biostatistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  7. 7.Development for FOCUS on Health & Leadership for WomenUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  8. 8.Medicine and EpidemiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  9. 9.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  10. 10.Department of SurgeryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations