Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 24, Supplement 3, pp 534–541 | Cite as

The Role of Patient Activation on Patient–Provider Communication and Quality of Care for US and Foreign Born Latino Patients

  • Margarita Alegría
  • William Sribney
  • Debra Perez
  • Mara Laderman
  • Kristen Keefe
Original Article



Previous research has shown positive effects of patient activation on healthcare outcomes, but there is practically no information on the generalization of these findings for Latino patients. Little data are available on whether patient activation is associated with healthcare outcomes for Latino patients and whether activation varies by language proficiency and nativity status.


We examined the levels of activation by characteristics of Latino patients (e.g. nativity, language, health status). We investigated whether patient activation relates to the quality of care received and enhanced doctor–patient communication for Latino patients.


We conducted analyses of 1,067 US born and foreign born Latinos who participated in the second wave of the PEW/RWJF Hispanic Healthcare Survey during 2008.


Participants were self-identified Latinos (18+) with a doctor visit, living in the contiguous United States who could be contacted by telephone.


US born Latinos had significantly (P < 0.001) greater patient activation scores than foreign born Latinos (75 versus 70). Latinos classified as bilingual and those reporting excellent health evidenced higher mean activation scores as compared to Spanish-speaking Latinos and those reporting fair or poor health. After adjusting for demographics, health status, other language and service use factors, patient activation was strongly associated with self-reported quality of care and better doctor–patient communication among both US and foreign born Latino respondents.


Interventions that augment patient activation could increase quality of care and improved patient–provider communication, potentially reducing health care disparities for Latinos.


patient–provider communication Latinos activation quality of care 



This publication was made possible by the Robert Wood Johnson MD002261-02 and also supported by NIH Research Grant # 1P50 MHO 73469 funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and #P60 MD0 02261 (NCMHD) funded by the National Center for Minority Health and Health Disparities.

Conflict of Interest

Drs. Alegria and Perez, Mr. Sribney, Ms. Laderman, and Ms. Keefe report no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Hibbard J, Cunningham P. How Engaged are Consumers in Their Health and Health Care, and Why Does It Matter? Washington: Center for Studying Health System Change; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clayton J, Butow P, Tattersall M, et al. Asking questions can help: Development and preliminary evaluation of a question prompt list for palliative care patients. Br J Cancer. 2003; 8911: 2069–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miranda J, Cooper L. Disparities in care for depression among primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 192: 120–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clever SL, Ford DE, Rubenstein LV, et al. Primary care patients’ involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression. Med Care. 2006; 445: 398–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Post DM, Cegala DJ, Miser WF. The other half of the whole: teaching patients to communicate with physicians. Fam Med. 2002; 345: 344–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korsch BM, Gozzi EK, Francis V. Gaps in doctor-patient communication. 1. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968; 425: 855–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roter D, Stewart M, Putnam S, Lipkin MJ, Stiles W, Inui T. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997; 277: 350–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beisdecker AE, Beisdecker TD. Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care. 1990; 28: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waitzkin H. Information giving in medical care. J Health Soc Behav. 1985; 262: 81–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988; 26: 657–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stewart AL, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB, et al. Do depressed patients in different treatment settings have different levels of well-being and functioning? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993; 615: 849–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer. 1990; 651: 186–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosenberg EE, Lussier MT, Beaudoin C. Lessons for clinicians from physician-patient communication literature. Arch Fam Med. 1997; 63: 279–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Epstein R, Campbell T, Cohen-Cole S, McWhinney I, Smilkstein G. Perspectives on patient-doctor communication. J Fam Pract. 1993; 37: 377–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989; 273 Supp: S110–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown B, Butow P, Dunn SM, Tattersall M. Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomized trial. Br J Cancer. 2001; 859: 1273–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pibernik-Okanovic M, Prasek M, Poljicanin-Filipovic T, Pavlic-Renar I, Metelko Z. Effects of an empowerment-based psychosocial intervention on quality of life and metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 52: 193–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Educ Monogr. 1977; 54: 281–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson SC, Nanni C, Schwankovsky L. Patient-oriented interventions to improve communication in a medical office visit. Health Psychol. 1990; 94: 390–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsay S, Hung L. Empowerment of patients with end-stage renal disease–a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004; 411: 59–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eisenthal S, Lazare A. Evaluation of the initial interview in a walk-in clinic. The patient’s perspective on a "customer approach". J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976; 1623: 169–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Flores G. Culture and the patient-physician relationship: achieving cultural competency in health care. J Pediatr. 2000; 1361: 14–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    American Medical Association. Culturally Competent Healthcare for Adolescents: a Guide for Primary Care Proiders. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1994.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted R. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 206: 531–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu K, Borders T, Arif A. Ethnic differences in parents’ perception of participatory decision-making style of their children’s physicians. Med Care. 2004; 424: 328–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hibbard J, Stockard J, Mahoney E, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004; 394p1: 1005–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cortés D, Mulvaney-Day N, Fortuna L, Reinfeld S, Alegría M. Patient–provider communication: understanding the role of patient activation for Latinos in mental health treatment. Health Educ Behav. 2008;EPub.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Current Population Survey. Annual Social and Economic (ASEC) Supplement, Conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau; 2007.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Livingston G, Minushkin S, Cohn D. Hispanics and Health Care in the United States: Access, Information and Knowledge: PEW Hispanic Center and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2008.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stewart A, Nápoles-Springer A, Gregorich S, Santoyo-Olsson J. Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups. Health Serv Res. 2007; 423p1: 1235–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stata Statistical Software Version 10.1. [computer program]. Version. College Station, TX; 2008.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alegría M, Polo A, Gao S, et al. Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care. Med Care. 2008; 463: 247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schaafsma ES, Raynor TD, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Accessing medication information by ethnic minorities: barriers and possible solutions. Pharm World Sci. 2003; 255: 185–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A, Willan A, Farrell S. Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians? J General Clinical Oncology. 2003; 21: 932–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margarita Alegría
    • 1
  • William Sribney
    • 2
  • Debra Perez
    • 3
  • Mara Laderman
    • 1
  • Kristen Keefe
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Multicultural Mental Health ResearchCambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical SchoolSomervilleUSA
  2. 2.Third Way StatisticsColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Robert Wood Johnson FoundationPrincetonUSA
  4. 4.Boston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations