Treatment of Obesity in Primary Care Practice in the United States: A Systematic Review
- 2k Downloads
This review examines the results of randomized controlled trials in which behavioral weight loss interventions, used alone or with pharmacotherapy, were provided in primary care settings.
Literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, and EMBASE (1950-present). Inclusion criteria for studies were: (1) randomized trial, (2) obesity intervention in US adults, and (3) conducted in primary care or explicitly intended to model a primary care setting.
Both authors reviewed each study to extract treatment modality, provider, setting, weight change, and attrition. The CONSORT criteria were used to assess study quality. Due to the small number and heterogeneity of studies, results were summarized but not pooled quantitatively.
Ten trials met the inclusion criteria. Studies were classified as: (1) PCP counseling alone, (2) PCP counseling + pharmacotherapy, and (3) “collaborative” obesity care (treatment delivered by a non-physician provider). Weight losses in the active treatment arms of these categories of studies ranged from 0.1 to 2.3 kg, 1.7 to 7.5 kg, and 0.4 to 7.7 kg, respectively. Most studies provided low- or moderate-intensity counseling, as defined by the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Current evidence does not support the use of low- to moderate-intensity physician counseling for obesity, by itself, to achieve clinically meaningful weight loss. PCP counseling plus pharmacotherapy, or intensive counseling (from a dietitian or nurse) plus meal replacements may help patients achieve this goal. Further research is needed on different models of managing obesity in primary care practice.
KEY WORDSobesity primary care health-care providers counseling drug therapy
Preparation of this manuscript was supported, in part, by NIH grants U01-HL087072, DK065018, and 5-K12-HD043459–04. The funding agencies had no role in the design and conduct of the review or in the preparation of the manuscript.
Potential conflict of interest
Dr. Tsai served from 2006–2008 as an unpaid consultant to a medically supervised low-calorie diet program at the University of Pennsylvania that uses products manufactured by Health Management Resources.™ Dr. Wadden serves as an unpaid consultant to the same program. He has previously served (but not since 2005) as a consultant to Novartis Nutrition, which manufactures OPTIFAST™, and to Abbott Laboratories, which markets sibutramine (Meridia™).
- 5.National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults—The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. 1998;6:51S–209S.Google Scholar
- 6.US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for obesity in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:930–2.Google Scholar
- 8.Kushner RF. Roadmaps for clinical practice: case studies in disease prevention and health promotion—assessment and management of adult obesity: a primer for physicians. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2003.Google Scholar
- 12.US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2007: recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Accessed January 30, 2008, at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/pocketgd.htm.
- 14.Blackburn GL, Greenberg I, Day KM, McNamara A, Fischer SG. Small steps and practical approaches to the treatment of obesity. Medscape Internal Medicine. Accessed August 7th, 2008, at: http://www.medscape.com/viewprogram/8204
- 16.Levi J, Segal LM, Gadola E. F as in Fat: how obesity policies are failing in America. Trust for America’s Health; 2007.Google Scholar
- 23.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville, MD; 2007: Accessed January 5th, 2009, at: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/repFiles/2007_10DraftMethodsGuide.pdf.
- 34.Ockene IS, Hebert JR, Ockene JK, et al. Effect of physician-delivered nutrition counseling training and an office-support program on saturated fat intake, weight, and serum lipid measurements in a hyperlipidemic population: Worcester Area Trial for Counseling in Hyperlipidemia (WATCH). Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:725–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288:2981–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 70.Veterans Affairs National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Motivating Overweight and Obese Veterans Everywhere (MOVE). Accessed December 15, 2008, at: http://www.move.va.gov.
- 71.Kaiser Permanente Care Management Institute. Kaiser Permanente Weight Management Initiative. Accessed January 15, 2009, at: http://www.kpcmi.org/weight-management/index.html.