Primary Care Physicians Treat Somatization
- First Online:
- 171 Downloads
We hypothesized that somatizing patients managed by primary care physicians (PCP) would improve with a relationship-based intervention.
We randomized 30 adults with medically unexplained symptoms to treatment or usual care. Four PCPs were trained to intervene with cognitive-behavioral, pharmacological, and patient-centered management and deployed the intervention with seven scheduled visits over 12 months. Outcomes obtained at baseline and 12 months were: Mental component summary (MCS), the primary endpoint, and measures of physical and psychological symptoms and of satisfaction with the PCP.
Patients averaged 52.5 years; 83.3% were female; 79.6% were black. Using a difference of differences approach, we found that the intervention produced a large effect size (ES) (0.82; CI: 0.08 to 1.57) for the MCS in the predicted direction, similar to the ES for physical (−0.80; CI: −1.55 to −0.04) and psychological (−1.06; CI: −1.83 to −0.28) improvement and for increased satisfaction with the PCP (0.94; CI: 0.15 to 1.74). Using ANCOVA in a sensitivity analysis, we found that the ES fell slightly (0.59), while other measures were unchanged.
Moderate-large effect sizes support the hypothesis that PCPs can effectively treat somatization. This points to the importance of performing a full RCT.
KEY WORDSsomatization medically unexplained symptoms primary care mental health patient-centered provider–patient relationship
- 7.Ware JE Jr., Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B.: SF-36 Health survey - manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Box 345, 750 Washington St., 1993.Google Scholar
- 8.Ware JE Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.Google Scholar
- 11.Smith RC. Patient-Centered Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Method. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002.Google Scholar
- 12.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Ann. 2002;32:509–15.Google Scholar
- 16.Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene PR, Jacobs GA. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) (“Self-Evaluation Questionnaire”). Palo Alto, CA 94303: Consulting Psycologists Press, Inc.; 1983.Google Scholar
- 18.Fleiss JL. Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: Wiley; 1999.Google Scholar