Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 727–732 | Cite as

Insights for Internists: “I Want the Computer to Know Who I Am”

  • Jan WalkerEmail author
  • David K. Ahern
  • Lan X. Le
  • Tom Delbanco
Original Article



In designing electronic personal health records (PHRs) and related health technologies, lay perspectives are rarely solicited, and we know little about what individuals want and need.


To learn how diverse, primarily lay individuals envision how PHRs and other emerging and future electronic technologies could enhance their care.


Qualitative study of eight focus groups with adult consumers, patients, and health professionals.


Eighty-two adult frequent Internet users who expressed interest in health-related matters and represented diverse populations and a broad demographic range.


Focus group transcripts were analyzed qualitatively, using behavioral and grounded theory, employing an immersion/crystallization approach.


Individuals expect technology to transform their interactions with the health-care system. Participants want computers to bring them customized health information and advice: “I want the computer to know who I am.” They desire unfettered access to their health record: “I don’t know if I want to read [my entire record], but I want to have it.” They expect home monitors and other technologies will communicate with clinicians, increasing efficiency and quality of life for patients and providers. Finally, especially for the chronically and acutely ill, privacy is of far less concern to patients than to health professionals.


Focus group participants have dynamic ideas about how information and related technologies could improve personal health management. Their perspectives, largely absent from the medical literature, provide insights that health professionals may lack. Including a diverse array of individuals throughout the process of designing new technologies will strengthen and shape their evolution.


health information technology patient preferences personal health records 



This work was presented in part at the SGIM Annual Meeting in 2007.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the consumers and health professionals who participated in groups; Lloyd Simon, Barry Orenstein, and Cambridge Focus who convened and led consumer groups; and Nadine Farag and Anna Mattson-DiCecca who contributed research assistance.

This study was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.


  1. 1.
    Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lohr S. Google offers personal health records on the web. The New York Times. May 20, 2008; Technology.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lohr S. Microsoft rolls out personal health records. The New York Times. Oct 4, 2007; Technology.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:121–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, et al. Care coordination/home telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2008;1410:1118–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hassol A, Walker JM, Kidder D, et al. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;116:505–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang PC, Lansky D. The missing link: Bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:1290–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delbanco T, Sands DZ. Electrons in flight--e-mail between doctors and patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1705–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Markle Foundation. Attitudes of Americans regarding personal health records and nationwide electronic health information exchange. Available at: Accessed March 18, 2009.
  10. 10.
    Tu HT, Cohen GR. Striking jump in consumers seeking health care information. Tracking Report No. 20. Center for Health System Change; August 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris Interactive. Few patients use or have access to online services for communicating with their doctors, but most would like to. Available at: = 1096. Accessed March 18, 2009.
  12. 12.
    Deloitte Center for Health Solutions. 2009 survey of health care consumers: key findings, strategic implications. Available at: Accessed March 18, 2009.
  13. 13.
    Markle Foundation Connecting for Health. Survey finds Americans want electronic personal health information to improve own health care. Available at: Accessed March 18, 2009.
  14. 14.
    Markle Foundation Connecting for Health. Americans overwhelmingly believe electronic personal health records could improve their health. Available at: Accessed March 18, 2009.
  15. 15.
    The National Alliance for Health Information Technology Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining Key Health Information Technology Terms. April 28, 2008. Available at: Accessed March 18, 2009.
  16. 16.
    QSR International Pty Ltd. Products: NVivo 7. Available at: Accessed March 18, 2009.
  17. 17.
    Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1992:3–28.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borkan J. Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:179–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stout D, Zeller T Jr. Vast data cache about veterans is stolen. New York Times. May 23, 2006; Washington.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Associated Press. TJX says theft of credit data involved 45.7 million cards. The New York Times. March 30, 2007; Business.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friedman TL. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Farrar, Straus, & Giroux; 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Walker
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • David K. Ahern
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lan X. Le
    • 4
  • Tom Delbanco
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Medicine and Primary CareBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  3. 3.Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations