Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Electronic Medical Record System: A Cognitive Task Analysis
To describe physicians’ patterns of using an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system; to reveal the underlying cognitive elements involved in EMR use, possible resulting errors, and influences on patient–doctor communication; to gain insight into the role of expertise in incorporating EMRs into clinical practice in general and communicative behavior in particular.
Cognitive task analysis using semi-structured interviews and field observations.
Twenty-five primary care physicians from the northern district of the largest health maintenance organization (HMO) in Israel.
The comprehensiveness, organization, and readability of data in the EMR system reduced physicians’ need to recall information from memory and the difficulty of reading handwriting. Physicians perceived EMR use as reducing the cognitive load associated with clinical tasks. Automaticity of EMR use contributed to efficiency, but sometimes resulted in errors, such as the selection of incorrect medication or the input of data into the wrong patient’s chart. EMR use interfered with patient–doctor communication. The main strategy for overcoming this problem involved separating EMR use from time spent communicating with patients. Computer mastery and enhanced physicians’ communication skills also helped.
There is a fine balance between the benefits and risks of EMR use. Automaticity, especially in combination with interruptions, emerged as the main cognitive factor contributing to errors. EMR use had a negative influence on communication, a problem that can be partially addressed by improving the spatial organization of physicians’ offices and by enhancing physicians’ computer and communication skills.
KEY WORDSElectronic Medical Record (EMR) primary care physician cognitive task analysis
- 13.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Outcome Project. 2008. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/. Accessed: September 18, 2008.
- 14.Shachak A, Reis S. The impact of electronic medical records on patient–doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 2008, in press.Google Scholar
- 23.Simon HA, Chase WG. Skill in chess. Am Sci. 1973;61(4):394–403.Google Scholar
- 24.Eysenck MW. Psychology: an International Perspective. New York: Psychology Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 27.Wheatley T, Wegner DM. Automaticity of action, psychology of. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, eds. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon; 2001:991–993.Google Scholar
- 29.Green M. Error and injury in computers & medical devices. 2004. Available at: http://www.expertlaw.com/library/computers/computer_negligence.html. Accessed: Sep 18, 2008.
- 30.Green M. Nursing error. 2004. Available at: http://www.visualexpert.com/Resources/nursingerror.html Accessed: September 18, 2008.
- 31.Dreyfus S, Dreyfus H. A Five-stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition. Berkeley: University of California; 1980.Google Scholar
- 34.Clicks®—medical information system. Available at: http://www.roshtov.com/ Accessed: Sep 18, 2008.
- 35.Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1990.Google Scholar
- 41.Collins S, Currie L, Patel V, Bakken S, Cimino JJ. Multitasking by clinicians in the context of CPOE and CIS use. Medinfo. 2007;12(Pt 2):958–962.Google Scholar
- 42.Collins S, Currie L, Bakken S, Cimino JJ. Interruptions during the use of a CPOE system for MICU rounds. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:895.Google Scholar
- 46.Chan W-S, Stevenson M, McGlade K. Do general practitioners change how they use the computer during consultations with a significant psychological component? Int J Med Inform. In press [corrected proof]. Epub 2007 Nov 22.Google Scholar
- 49.Chipman S, Schraagen J, Shalin V. Introduction to cognitive task analysis. In: Schraagen J, Chipman S, Shalin V, eds. Cognitive Task Analysis. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.Google Scholar