“What is Found There”1: Qualitative Analysis of Physician–Nurse Collaboration Stories
- First Online:
- 715 Downloads
Effective physician–nurse collaboration is an important, but incompletely understood determinant of patient and nurse satisfaction, and patient safety. Its impact on physicians has not been described. This study was undertaken to develop a fuller understanding of the collaboration experience and its outcomes.
Twenty-five medical residents, 32 staff nurses, 5 physician and 5 nurse faculty wrote narratives about successful collaboration; the narratives were then qualitatively analyzed. Narrative analysis was the initial qualitative method iteratively employed to identfy themes. A phenomenological approach was subsequently used to develop a framework for collaborative competence.
Collaboration triggers, facilitative behaviors, outcomes and collaborative competence were the themes identified. Affect was identified in the triggers leading to collaboration and in its outcomes. Practioners typically entered a care episode feeling worrried, uncertain or inadequate and finished the interaction feeling satisfied, understood and grateful to their colleagues. The frequency of affective experience was not altered by gender, profession, or ethnicity. These experiences were particularly powerful for novice practioners of both disciplines and appear to have both formative and transformative potential. Collaborative competence was characterized by a series of graduated skills in clinical and relational domains. Many stories took place in the ICU and afterhours settings.
Despite the prevailing wisdom that nursing and medicine are qualitatively different, the stories from this study illuminate surprising commonalities in the collaboration experience, regardless of gender, age, experience, or profession. Collaborative competence can be defined and its component skills identified. Contexts of care can be identified that offer particularly rich opportunities to foster interprofessional collaboration.
KEY WORDScollaboration competency relationship-centered practice teamwork
- 1.Williams WC. Asphodel. New Directions Publishing Corporation; 1962.Google Scholar
- 11.Horak BJ, Pauig J, Keidan B, Kerns J. Patient safety: a case study in team building and interdisciplinary collaboration. J Health Qual. 2004;26(2):6–12.Google Scholar
- 13.ACGME Outcomes Project: General Competencies http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp; Accessed November 2008.
- 18.Yildirim A, Akinci F, Ates M, et al. Turkish version of the Jefferson Scale of attitudes toward physician–nurse collaboration: a preliminary study. D.Contemp Nurse. 2006;23(1):38–45.Google Scholar
- 20.Stein L. The doctor–nurse game. Arch of Gen Psychiatry. 1967;16:699–703.Google Scholar
- 23.Thesen J, Kuzel AJ. Participatory inquiry. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:269–92.Google Scholar
- 24.Cooperrider D, Whitney D. Collaborating for Change: Appreciative Inquiry. Berrett-Koehler Communications; 1999.Google Scholar
- 25.Bushe G. Appreciative inquiry with teams. Organ Dev J. 1998;16(3):41–50.Google Scholar
- 26.Bushe G. Five theories of change embedded in appreciative inquiry. In: Cooperrider D, Sorenson P, Whitney D, Yeager T, eds. Appreciative Inquiry: An Emerging Direction for Organization Development. Champaign, IL: Stipes; 2001.Google Scholar
- 27.Burke K. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1969.Google Scholar
- 28.Creswell JW. Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. In: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Traditions. Thousand Parks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2007:53–84.Google Scholar
- 29.Moustakas C. Phenomenological Research Methods. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publishers; 1994.Google Scholar
- 30.Groenewald T. A phenomenological research design illustrated. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(1)1–26.Google Scholar
- 32.Crabtree B, Miller W. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2007.Google Scholar
- 33.Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Traditions. Standards of Validation and Evaluation. Thousand Parks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2007:207–9.Google Scholar
- 34.Gilcrist VJ, Williams RL. Chap 4, key informant interviews. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:71–88.Google Scholar
- 36.Mason DJ. MD-RN: a tired old dance. Am J Nursing. 2002;102(6):7.Google Scholar
- 43.Kramer M, Schmalenberg C. Securing “good” nurse–physician relationships. Nurs Manage. 2003;July 34–8.Google Scholar
- 45.Tresolini C. Relationship-Centered Care: Report of the Pew-Fetzer Task Force on Advancing Psychosocial Health Education, 1994. http://futurehealth.ucsf.edu/pdf_files/RelationshipCentered.pdf, accessed, 7/08.
- 46.Watson J. Caring theory as an ethical guide to administrative and clinical practice. Nursing Admin Q. 2006;30(1)48–55.Google Scholar
- 47.Sumerel MB. Parallel Process in Supervision. ERIC Digest 1994-04-0015.Google Scholar
- 48.Canadian Inter-professional Health Collaborative. Inter-professional Education & Core Competencies Literature Review. May 2007. Accessed July, 2008. http://www.cihc.ca/about/curricula.html.