Variation in Physician-patient Discussion of Breast Reconstruction
- First Online:
- 115 Downloads
For women with early stage breast cancer, physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction is an essential step in their participation in the decision-making process for their treatments. This study examines sociodemographic variation of physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction and explores the impact of this discussion on the use of breast reconstruction.
We used data from the Los Angeles Women’s Study, a population-based study of women 50 years and older with breast cancer. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the impact of patient and hospital characteristics on self-reported receipt of physician-patient discussion and use of breast reconstruction.
Of 315 post-mastectomy women, 81% and 27% reported physician-patient discussion and use of breast reconstruction, respectively. In multivariable analysis, women with an annual income <$20,000 were less likely to have physician-patient discussion than women with annual income ≥$40,000 (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07–0.82). Among the subset of women with physician-patient discussion, chest wall radiation, a known characteristic associated with higher rates of reconstruction complications, became an additional significant negative predictor of reconstruction.
Lower income women are at risk of not receiving physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction. Physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction appears to decrease the use of breast reconstruction among women with clinical characteristics associated with higher rates of reconstruction complications and failure. This highlights the need for interventions to increase physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction among lower income women.
KEY WORDSbreast reconstruction decision-making low income
- 1.United States Cancer Statistics. 2002 Incidence and Mortality. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2005.Google Scholar
- 21.Greenberg CC, Schneider EC, Lipsitz SR, et al. Do variation in provider discussions explain socioeconomic disparities in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction? American College of Surgeons; 2008.Google Scholar
- 22.Yoon J, Malin JL, Tao ML, et al. Symptoms after breast cancer treatment: are they influenced by patient characteristics? Breast Cancer Res Treat. May 10 2007.Google Scholar
- 23.Yoon J, Malin JL, Tisnado DM, et al. Symptom management after breast cancer treatment: is it influenced by patient characteristics? Breast Cancer Res Treat. Jul 19 2007.Google Scholar
- 33.American Hospital Association Health Forum LLC (1994–1999): Annual Survey of Hospitals. Chicago: American Hospital Association.Google Scholar
- 34.California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. Hospital Discharge Abstract Data Set: Sacramento California; 2000.Google Scholar
- 35.Hosmer DWJSL. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
- 36.Hosmer DWJLS. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley; 1989.Google Scholar
- 37.U.S. Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services. Your Rights after a Mastectomy: Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998. http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/whcra.html. Accessed October 20, 2008, 2008.
- 38.Hewitt M, Simone, Joseph V, eds. National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 42.http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/06/Catalog-AI-AN-NA/BRFSS.htm. Date accessed October 20, 2008. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) [