Providers’ Experience with an Organizational Redesign Initiative to Promote Patient-Centered Access: A Qualitative Study
Patient-centered access is a philosophy and a method that supports efforts to redesign health-care delivery systems to deliver higher quality care and to better meet the needs and preferences of patients. Since mid-2000, Group Health Cooperative has pursued an ensemble of strategic initiatives aimed at promoting patient-centered access, referred to as the Access Initiative. In support of this strategy, Group Health has also engaged in enterprise implementation of an electronic medical record and clinical information system that is integrated with their patient Web site, MyGroupHealth.
To elicit, describe, and characterize providers’ perceptions of the effects of the Access Initiative, an information technology-enabled organizational redesign initiative intended to promote patient-centered access.
Thematic analysis of semi-structured in-depth interviews.
Twenty-two care providers representing 14 primary care, medical, and surgical specialties at Group Health Cooperative, an integrated health-care system based in Seattle, Washington.
Analyses of the interview transcripts revealed nine emergent themes, five of which have particular relevance for health-care organizations pursuing patient-centered access: the Access Initiative improved patient satisfaction, improved the quality of encounter-based care, compromised providers’ focus on population health, created additional work for providers, and decreased job satisfaction for primary care providers and some medical specialists.
Providers like that the Access Initiative is mostly good for their patients, but dislike the negative effects on their own quality of life – especially in primary care. These reforms may not be sustainable under current models of organization and financing.
KEY WORDSpatient-centered access information technology qualitative evaluation organizational redesign informatics
Acknowledgments and Conflicts of Interest
This study was funded by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. All study activities and protocols were reviewed and approved by the Group Health Cooperative Center for Health Studies’ Institutional Review Board. While Mr. Tufano and Dr. Ralston are currently employed by the Group Health Cooperative Center for Health Studies, they retained full independence in the conduct of this research. Dr. Martin reports no potential conflict of interest related to this endeavor.
- 1.Woolf SH. Patient safety is not enough: targeting quality improvements to optimize the health of the population. Ann Intern Med. 2004;143:33–36.Google Scholar
- 7.Ornstein C. Hospital heeds doctors, suspends use of software: Cedars-Sinai physicians entered prescriptions and other orders in it, but called it unsafe. Los Angeles Times. January 22, 2003:B1.Google Scholar
- 8.Ralston JD. Group Health Cooperative’s transformation to patient-centered access. Managed Care Interface. (in press).Google Scholar
- 10.U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) website accessed July 25, 2008 http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/software/answr.htm
- 14.Garibaldi RA, Popkave C, Bylsma W. Career plans for trainees in internal medicine residency programs. Academic Med. 2005;142:715–724.Google Scholar
- 17.American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American Osteopathic Association. Joint principles of the patient-centered medical home. February 2007. Website accessed 8/5/08 http://www.medicalhomeinfo.org/Joint%20Statement.pdf