Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 1896–1903 | Cite as

National Evaluation of Policies on Individual Financial Conflicts of Interest in Canadian Academic Health Science Centers

  • Joel Lexchin
  • Melanie Sekeres
  • Jennifer Gold
  • Lorraine E. Ferris
  • Sunila R. Kalkar
  • Wei Wu
  • Marleen Van Laethem
  • An-Wen Chan
  • David Moher
  • M. James Maskalyk
  • Nathan Taback
  • Paula A. Rochon
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Conflicts of interest (COI) in research are an important emerging topic of investigation and are frequently cited as a serious threat to the integrity of human participant research.

Objective

To study financial conflicts of interest (FCOI) policies for individual investigators working in Canadian academic health centers.

Design

Survey instrument containing 61 items related to FCOI.

Setting

All Canadian academic health science centers (universities with faculties of medicine, faculties of medicine and teaching hospitals) were requested to provide their three primary FCOI policies.

Measurements

Number of all centers and teaching hospitals with policies addressing each of the 61 items related to FCOI.

Main Results

Only one item was addressed by all 74 centers. Thirteen items were present in fewer than 25% of centers. Fewer than one-quarter of hospitals required researchers to disclose FCOI to research participants. The role of research ethics boards (REBs) in hospitals was marginal.

Limitations

Asking centers to identify only three policies may not have inclusively identified all FCOI policies in use. Additionally, policies at other levels might apply. For instance, all institutions receiving federal grant money must comply with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.

Conclusions

Canadian centers within the same level (for instance, teaching hospitals) differ significantly in the areas that their policies address and these policies differ widely in their coverage. Presently, no single policy in any Canadian center informs researchers about the broad range of individual FCOI issues. Canadian investigators need to understand the environment surrounding FCOI, be able to access and follow the relevant policies and be confident that they can avoid entering into a FCOI.

KEY WORDS

investigator financial conflicts of interest academic health science centers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge John Hoey and David Streiner for their assistance in the development of this project. We would like to thank Peter Anderson and Marie-Eve Couture for their help in this project. Marie-Eve Couture assisted with the data abstraction of all French language policies.

Source of funding

This project was funded by a Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Grant entitled the Evaluation of the Integrity of Clinical Research in Canada EIC - 77338. The sponsor did not play any role in the design, analysis, or publication of this study.

Disclosures

Joel Lexchin (Apotex - 2006) has been retained by a law firm acting for Apotex, a Canadian generic manufacturer, to provide information relevant to two court cases involving the proposed launch of generic equivalents.

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson DF. Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:573–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedman LS, Richter ED. Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:51–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lexchin J. Implications of pharmaceutical industry funding on clinical research. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:194–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kjaergard LL, Als-Nielsen B. Association between competing interests and authors’ conclusions: epidemiological study of randomized clinical trials published in the BMJ. BMJ. 2002;325:249–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Began BL. Ethics review for human subjects research: interviews with members of research ethics boards and national organizations. In: McDonald M, ed. The governance of health research involving human subjects (HRIHS). Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada; 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferris L, Naylor CD. Physician remuneration in industry-sponsored clinical trials: the case for standardized clinical trial budgets. CMAJ. 2004;171:883–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Controversy of the year. Biomedical ethics on the front burner. Science 2000;290:2225.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    White C. Three journals raise doubts on validity of Canadian studies. BMJ. 2004;328:67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Naylor CD. Early Toronto experience with new standards for industry-sponsored clinical research: a progress report. CMAJ. 2002;166:453–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans, 1998 (with 2000, 2002, 2005 amendments). Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2005.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Institutional oversight of individual financial interests in human subjects research: assessing policies and practices. Association of American Medical Colleges, nd. (Accessed July 7, 2008, at http://www.aamc.org/research/coi/coisurvey2003.pdf)
  13. 13.
    Ehringhaus S, Korn D. U.S. medical school policies on individual financial conflicts of interest: results of an AAMC survey. Washington: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cho MK, Shohara R, Schissel A, Rennie D. Policies on faculty conflicts of interest at US universities. JAMA. 2000;284:2203–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hampson LA, Agrawal M, Joffe S, Gross CP, Verter J, Emanuel EJ. Patients’ views on financial conflicts of interest in cancer research trials. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2330–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Memorandum of understanding (MOU) on the roles and responsibilities in the management of federal grants and awards. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, 2008. (Accessed July 7, 2008, at http://www.nserc.gc.ca/institution/mou_e.htm)
  17. 17.
    Mello MM, Clarridge BR, Studdert DM. Academic medical centers’ standards for clinical-trial agreements with industry. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2202–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van McCrary S, Anderson CB, Jakovljevic J, et al. A national survey of policies on disclosure of conlficts of interest in biomedical research. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1621–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dinan MA, Weinfurt KP, Friedman JY, et al. Comparison of conflict of interest policies and reported practices in academic medical centers in the United States. Account Res. 2006;13:325–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boyd EA, Cho MK, Bero LA. Financial conflict-of-interest policies in clinical research: issues for clinical investigators. Acad Med. 2003;78:769–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McDonald M, ed. The governance of health research involving human subjects (HRIHS). Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada; 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel Lexchin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Melanie Sekeres
    • 4
  • Jennifer Gold
    • 5
  • Lorraine E. Ferris
    • 6
  • Sunila R. Kalkar
    • 7
  • Wei Wu
    • 7
  • Marleen Van Laethem
    • 8
    • 9
  • An-Wen Chan
    • 10
  • David Moher
    • 11
  • M. James Maskalyk
    • 12
  • Nathan Taback
    • 13
  • Paula A. Rochon
    • 7
  1. 1.School of Health Policy and ManagementYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Emergency DepartmentUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Ontario Medical AssociationTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Public Health SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  7. 7.Baycrest- Kunin Lunenfeld Applied Research UnitTorontoCanada
  8. 8.Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteTorontoCanada
  9. 9.University of Toronto, Joint Centre for BioethicsTorontoCanada
  10. 10.Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  11. 11.CHEO Research InstituteOttawaCanada
  12. 12.Division of Emergency MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  13. 13.St. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations