Affective Forecasting: An Unrecognized Challenge in Making Serious Health Decisions
- 1.1k Downloads
Patients facing medical decisions that will impact quality of life make assumptions about how they will adjust emotionally to living with health declines and disability. Despite abundant research on decision-making, we have no direct research on how accurately patients envision their future well-being and how this influences their decisions. Outside medicine, psychological research on “affective forecasting” consistently shows that people poorly predict their future ability to adapt to adversity. This finding is important for medicine, since many serious health decisions hinge on quality-of-life judgments. We describe three specific mechanisms for affective forecasting errors that may influence health decisions: focalism, in which people focus more on what will change than on what will stay the same; immune neglect, in which they fail to envision how their own coping skills will lessen their unhappiness; and failure to predict adaptation, in which people fail to envision shifts in what they value. We discuss emotional and social factors that interact with these cognitive biases. We describe how caregivers can recognize these biases in the clinical setting and suggest interventions to help patients recognize and address affective forecasting errors.
KEY WORDSdecision-making communication patient preferences doctor–patient relationship quality of life
Financial support: Dr. Halpern’s work was supported by the Greenwall Foundation Faculty Scholar’s Program, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the National Institute of Mental Health. Dr. Arnold was supported by the Greenwall Foundation, Ladies Hospital Aid Society of Western Pennsylvania, the Jewish Health Care Foundation, the National Center for Palliative Care Research, and the LAS Trust Foundation.
Acknowledgement for Katie Hasson and Deb Seltzer: “For excellent editorial assistance.” And Anthony Back and Peter Ubel: “For useful comments about how to improve paper.”
Conflicts of Interest
- 3.Loewenstein G. Projection bias in medical decision making. Med Decis Making. 2005; 25(1):96–105.Google Scholar
- 10.Maguire P, Faulkner A. Communicate with cancer patients: 2 Handling uncertainty, collusion, and denial. Br Med J. 1988;297:972–974.Google Scholar
- 16.Carrese JA. Refusal of care: patients’ well-being and physicians’ ethical obligations: “But doctor, I want to go home”. JAMA. 2006;296(6):375–376.Google Scholar
- 17.Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 18.Snyder L, Leffler C, for the Ethics and Human Rights Committee ACoP. Ethics Manual. 5th ed. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(7):560–82.Google Scholar
- 20.Grisso T, Appelbaum P. Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide to Physicians and Other Health Care Professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
- 23.Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
- 28.Lacey HP, Fagerlin A, Loewenstein G, Smith DM, Riis J, Ubel PA. It must be awful for them: Perspectives and task context affects ratings for health conditions. Judgment and Decision Making. 2006;1(2):146–152, Nov.Google Scholar
- 31.Schwarz N, Clore G. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski A, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York: The Guilford Press; 1996.Google Scholar
- 40.Brenner C. The Mind in Conflict. New York: International Universities Press; 1982.Google Scholar
- 41.Mitchell SA. Contemporary perspectives on self: toward an integration. Psychoanal Dialogues. 1991;1(2):121–47.Google Scholar
- 42.Winnicott DW. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment; Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. London: Hogarth; 1965.Google Scholar
- 43.Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry/VI. 6Baltimore, MD: Wiliams & Wilkins; 1995.Google Scholar
- 46.Weisman A. The Coping Capacity. New York, NY: Human Sciences Press; 1984.Google Scholar
- 49.Craske MG. Anxiety Disorders: Psychological Approaches to Theory and Treatment. Boulder: CO: Westview Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 51.Persons JB. Cognitive Therapy in Practice: A Case Formulation Approach. 1New York: Norton; 1989.Google Scholar
- 52.Academy of Cognitive Therapy. Training certification as a cognitive therapist. www.academyofct.org.
- 53.Elster J. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 56.patientslikeme.com [homepage on the Internet]. September 27, 2007; www.patientslikeme.com. Accessed September 27, 2007.
- 57.O’Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for paitents facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J. 1999;319:731–734. September 18, 1999.Google Scholar
- 63.Eich E, Forgas JP. Mood, cognition, and memory. In: Weiner IB, Freedheim DK, Schinka JA, Velicer WF, Lerner RM, eds. Handbook of Psychology, Vol 4. New York: Wiley; 2003:61–83.Google Scholar
- 64.Philippot P, Schaefer A. Emotion and memory. In: Mayne, TJ, Bonanno, GA, eds. Emotions: Current Issues and Future Directions. New York, NY: Guiliford Press; 2001:82–122.Google Scholar
- 65.Halpern J. From Detached Concern to Empathy: Humanizing Medical Practice. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 66.LeDoux J. Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are. New York: Penguin; 2003.Google Scholar
- 83.O’Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J. 1999;319:731–734. September 18, 1999.Google Scholar