Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 1477–1481

Sources of U.S. Physician Income: The Contribution of Government Payments to the Specialist–Generalist Income Gap

  • Karen E. Lasser
  • Steffie Woolhandler
  • David U. Himmelstein
Report

Abstract

Background

Physician income varies threefold among specialties. Lower incomes have produced shortages in primary care fields.

Objective

To investigate the impact of government policy on generating income differentials among specialties.

Design and Participants

Cross-sectional analysis of the 2004 MEPS.

Measurements

For outpatient care, total payments made to 27 different types of specialists from five types of payers: Medicare, Medicaid, other government (the Veterans Administration and other state and local programs), private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. For inpatient care, aggregate (i.e., all-specialty) inpatient physician reimbursement from the five payers.

Results

In 2004, physicians derived 78.6% of their practice income ($149,684 million, 95% CI, $140,784 million—$158,584 million) from outpatient sources and 21.4% of their income ($40,782 million, 95% CI, $36,839 million—$44,724 million) from inpatient sources. Government payers accounted for 32.7% of total physician income. Four specialties derived > 50% of their outpatient income from public sources, including both the lowest and highest paid specialties (geriatrics and hematology/oncology, respectively).

Conclusions

Inter-specialty income differences result, in part, from government decisions.

Key words

physician income contribution of government payments specialist–generalist income gap 

Supplementary material

11606_2008_660_MOESM1_ESM.doc (160 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 159 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Campbell RJ, Ramirez AM, Perez K, Roetzheim RG. Cervical cancer rates and the supply of primary care physicians in Florida. Fam Med. 2003;35(1):60–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franks P, Fiscella K. Primary care physicians and specialists as personal physicians. Health care expenditures and mortality experience. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(2):105–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gulliford MC. Availability of primary care doctors and population health in England: is there an association? J Public Health Med. 2002;24(4):252–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jarman B, Gault S, Alves B, et al. Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. Br Med J (Clinical Research Ed.). 1999;318(7197):1515–20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Malley AS, Forrest CB, Politzer RM, Wulu JT, Shi L. Health center trends, 1994–2001: what do they portend for the federal growth initiative? Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(2):465–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi L, Starfield B, Kennedy B, Kawachi I. Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(4):275–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shi L, Macinko J, Starfield B, Politzer R, Wulu J, Xu J. Primary care, social inequalities, and all-cause, heart disease, and cancer mortality in US counties, 1990. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(4):674–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shi L, Macinko J, Starfield B, Politzer R, Xu J. Primary care, race, and mortality in US states. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(1):65–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baicker K, Chandra A. Medicare spending, the physician workforce, and beneficiaries’ quality of care. Health Affairs. 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:W184–97.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mark DH, Gottlieb MS, Zellner BB, Chetty VK, Midtling JE. Medicare costs in urban areas and the supply of primary care physicians. J Fam Pract. 1996;43(1):33–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 2005;83(3):457–502.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Welch WP, Miller ME, Welch HG, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE. Geographic variation in expenditures for physicians' services in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(9):621–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Starfield B, Shi L. Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health Policy. 2002;60(3):201–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bodenheimer T. Primary care-will it survive? N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):861–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berenson A. Sending back the doctor’s bill. The New York Times 2007 July 29;3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    American College of Physicians. The impending collapse of primary care medicine and its implications in the state of the nation’s health care. A public policy report of the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia: January 30, 2006. Available at http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/events/state_of_healthcare/statehc06_1.pdf Accessed March 31, 2008.
  17. 17.
    Bodenheimer T, Berenson RA, Rudolf P. The primary care-specialty income gap: why it matters. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4):301–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Woo B. Primary care-the best job in medicine?. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):864–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maxwell S, Zuckerman S, Berenson RA. Use of physicians' services under Medicare's resource-based payments. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1853–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohen JW, Monheit AC, Beauregard KM, et al. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry. 1996;33(4):373–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Medical Group Management Association, Englewood, Colorado, December 2005.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):273–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    OECD Health Data 2004: A Comparative Analysis of 30 Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2004.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guyatt G, Devereaux PJ, Lexchin J, et al.. A systematic review of studies comparing health outcomes in Canada and the United States. Open Medicine. 2007;1(1):27–36.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wassenaar JD, Thran SL, eds. Physician Socioeconomic Statistics. 2000–2002 ed. Chicago, Illinois: American Medical Association; 2001.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ginsburg PB, Berenson RA. Revising Medicare's physician fee schedule-much activity, little change. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(12):1201–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American Geriatrics Society and Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs (ADGAP). Geriatric Medicine: A Clinical Imperative for an Aging Population. New York; 2007.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berkman LF, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen E. Lasser
    • 1
  • Steffie Woolhandler
    • 1
  • David U. Himmelstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineThe Cambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical SchoolCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations