Experienced medical student educators may have insight into the reasons for declining interest in internal medicine (IM) careers, particularly general IM.
To identify factors that, according to IM clerkship directors, influence students’ decisions for specialty training in IM.
Cross-sectional national survey.
One hundred ten institutional members of Clerkship Directors in IM.
Frequency counts and percentages were reported for descriptive features of clerkships, residency match results, and clerkship directors’ perceptions of factors influencing IM career choice at participating schools. Perceptions were rated on a five-point scale (1 = very much pushes students away from IM careers; 5 = very much attracts students toward IM careers).
Survey response rate was 83/110 (76%); 80 answered IM career-choice questions. Clerkship directors identified three educational items attracting students to IM careers: quality of IM faculty (mean score 4.3, SD = 0.56) and IM rotation (4.1, SD = 0.67), and experiences with IM residents (3.9, SD = 0.94). Items felt most strongly to push students away from IM careers were current practice environment for internists (mean score 2.1, SD = 0.94), income (2.1, SD = 1.08), medical school debt (2.3, SD = 0.89), and work hours in IM (2.4, SD = 1.05). Factor analysis indicated three factors explaining students’ career choices: value/prestige of IM, clerkship experience, and exposure to internists.
IM clerkship directors believe that IM clerkship experiences attract students toward IM, whereas the income and lifestyle for practicing internists dissuade them. These results suggest that interventions to enhance the practice environment for IM could increase student interest in the field.
career choice education, medical, undergraduate medical students, workforce
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We gratefully acknowledge the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine Research Committee and staff, and Patricia O’Sullivan, EdD, for statistical assistance.
The Shadyside Hospital Foundation of Pittsburgh, PA, and the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation.
NRMP. Advance Data Tables for 2007 Main Residency Match. In: National Resident Matching Program; 2007.Google Scholar
Hirshfeld J Jr., Fye WB. Summary of Task Force recommendations to address the growing shortage of cardiologists. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(2):272–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hortobagyi GN. A shortage of oncologists? The American Society of Clinical Oncology workforce study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(12):1468–1469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Cravens DD, Campbell JD, Mehr DR. Why geriatrics? Academic geriatricians’ perceptions of the positive, attractive aspects of geriatrics. Fam Med. 2000;32(1):34–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, Divine GW, Broadhead WE. The impact of an ambulatory rotation on medical student interest in internal medicine. The Society of General Internal Medicine Task Force on Career Choice in Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(10):542–549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bauer RL, Venkatachalam HM, Forrester RH, Harris GD, Diehl AK. The effect of an ambulatory internal medicine rotation on students’ career choices. Acad Med. 1997;72(2):147–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Arora V, Wetterneck TB, Schnipper JL, et al. Effect of the inpatient general medicine rotation on student pursuit of a generalist career. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(5):471–475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Davis BE, Nelson DB, Sahler OJ, McCurdy FA, Goldberg R, Greenberg LW. Do clerkship experiences affect medical students’ attitudes toward chronically ill patients? Acad Med. 2001;76(8):815–820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wetterneck TB, Linzer M, McMurray JE, et al. Worklife and satisfaction of general internists. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(6):649–656.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1173–1178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Weinberger SE, Smith LG, Collier VU. Redesigning training for internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(12):927–932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hauer KE, Alper EJ, Clayton CP, Hershman WY, Whelan AJ, Woolliscroft JO. Educational responses to declining student interest in internal medicine careers. Am J Med. 2005;118(10):1164–11670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Margo K, Fincher, RE, Espey, E. The role of the clerkship director. In: Fincher RE, ed. Guidebook for Clerkship Directors, 3rd Edition. Alliance for Clinical Education; 2005.Google Scholar
Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, Divine GW, Broadhead E. Medical student interest in internal medicine. Initial report of the Society of General Internal Medicine Interest Group Survey on Factors Influencing Career Choice in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(1):6–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Stevens J. Principal Components. In: Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers; 1986.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CH. The impact of U.S. medical students’ debt on their choice of primary care careers: an analysis of data from the 2002 medical school graduation questionnaire. Acad Med. 2005;80(9):815–819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Moore G, Showstack J. Primary care medicine in crisis: toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):244–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(7):441–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Ricer RE, Van Horne A, Filak AT. Costs of preceptors’ time spent teaching during a third-year family medicine outpatient rotation. Acad Med. 1997;72(6):547–551.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar