Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 846–853 | Cite as

A Systematic Review of Teamwork Training Interventions in Medical Student and Resident Education

  • Chayan ChakrabortiEmail author
  • Romsai T. Boonyasai
  • Scott M. Wright
  • David E. Kern
Clinical Review



Teamwork is important for improving care across transitions between providers and for increasing patient safety.


This review’s objective was to assess the characteristics and efficacy of published curricula designed to teach teamwork to medical students and house staff.


The authors searched MEDLINE, Education Resources Information Center, Excerpta Medica Database, PsychInfo, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Scopus for original data articles published in English between January 1980 and July 2006 that reported descriptions of teamwork training and evaluation results.


Two reviewers independently abstracted information about curricular content (using Baker’s framework of teamwork competencies), educational methods, evaluation design, outcomes measured, and results.


Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. All curricula employed active learning methods; the majority (77%) included multidisciplinary training. Ten curricula (77%) used an uncontrolled pre/post design and 3 (23%) used controlled pre/post designs. Only 3 curricula (23%) reported outcomes beyond end of program, and only 1 (8%) >6weeks after program completion. One program evaluated a clinical outcome (patient satisfaction), which was unchanged after the intervention. The median effect size was 0.40 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.29, 0.61) for knowledge, 0.38 (IQR 0.32, 0.41) for attitudes, 0.41 (IQR 0.35, 0.49) for skills and behavior. The relationship between the number of teamwork principles taught and effect size achieved a Spearman’s correlation of .74 (p = .01) for overall effect size and .64 (p = .03) for median skills/behaviors effect size.


Reported curricula employ some sound educational principles and appear to be modestly effective in the short term. Curricula may be more effective when they address more teamwork principles.

Key words

teamwork cooperation medical education curricula medical student house staff resident residency 



The authors are indebted to Ms. Cheri Smith from the Harrison Medical Library, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, for her library assistance and to Ms. Ming An from the Bloomberg School of Public Health for assistance with statistical analysis. Dr. Scott Wright is an Arnold P. Gold Associate Professor of Medicine and a Miller-Coulson Family Scholar. At the time this review was conducted, Dr. Chayan Chakraborti was supported by National Research Service Award Institutional Grant (#5-T-32-HP10025). Dr. Romsai Boonyasai was supported by Behavioral Research in Heart and Vascular Disease Grant (#T32HL07180). Dr. Chakraborti had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr. Boonyasai was involved in data collection, interpretation, and analysis. Dr. Wright and Dr. Kern provided methodological advice, data interpretation, and edited the manuscript. Material from this manuscript was presented at the 2007 Society of General Internal Medicine National Conference in Toronto, Canada.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.


  1. 1.
    Reuben DB, Levy-Storms L, Yee MN, et al. Disciplinary split: a threat to geriatrics interdisciplinary team training. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(61):000–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J, et al. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ. 2001;323(7316):784–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stevenson K, Baker R, Farooqi A, Sorrie R, Khunti K. Features of primary health care teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2001;18(1):21–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unutzer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(22):2836–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pizzi L, Goldfarb N, Nash D. Crew resource management and its applications in medicine. In: Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: AHRQ Publication No. 01- E058. 2001;43:501–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morey JC, Simon R, Jay GD, et al. Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(6):1553–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Risser DT, Rice MM, Salisbury ML, Simon R, Jay GD, Berns SD. The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. The MedTeams Research Consortium. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34(3):373–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meterko M, Mohr DC, Young GJ. Teamwork culture and patient satisfaction in hospitals. Med Care. 2004;42(5):492–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goni S. An analysis of the effectiveness of Spanish primary health care teams. Health Policy. 1999;48(2):107–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, et al. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999;37(11):1140–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corrigan J. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aspden P, Wolcott J, Bootman J, Cronenwett L. Committee on identifying and preventing medication errors: quality chasm series. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ACGME. ACGME outcome project—core competencies. Chicago, IL: ACGMEAvailable at: Accessed February 10, 2008.
  15. 15.
    Fitzgibbons JP, Bordley DR, Berkowitz LR, Miller BW, Henderson MC. Redesigning residency education in internal medicine: a position paper from the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(12):920–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weinberger SE, Smith LG, Collier VU. Redesigning training for internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(12):927–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baker DP, Gustafson S, Beaubien JM, Salas E, Barach P. Advances in patient safety: medical team training programs in health care. Washington, D.C.: Am Institute for Research; 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zwarenstein M, Bryant W. Interventions to promote collaboration between nurses and doctors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000072.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zwarenstein M, Reeves S, Barr H, Hammick M, Koppel I, Atkins J. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD002213.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baker DP, Salas E, King H, Battles J, Barach P. The role of teamwork in the professional education of physicians: current status and assessment recommendations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(4):185–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salas E, Sims DE, Burke CS. Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Res. 2005;36(5):555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilson KA, Burke CS, Priest HA, Salas E. Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(4):303–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.; 1993.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bravata DM, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, Sundaram V, Owens DK. Challenges in systematic reviews: synthesis of topics related to the delivery, organization, and financing of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12):1056–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, et al. Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12):1080–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cooper HM, Hedges LV. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1994.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grogan EL, Stiles RA, France DJ, et al. The impact of aviation-based teamwork training on the attitudes of health-care professionals. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(6):843–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Østergaard HT, Østergaard D, Lippert A. Implementation of team training in medical education in Denmark. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(SUPPL. 1):i91–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ponzer S, Hylin U, Kusoffsky A, et al. Interprofessional training in the context of clinical practice: Goals and students’ perceptions on clinical education wards. Med Educ. 2004;38(7):727–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Epstein R, Dannefer E, Nofziger A, et al. Comprehensive assessment of professional competence: the Rochester Experiment. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(2):186–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fulmer T, Hyer K, Flaherty E, et al. Geriatric interdisciplinary team training program: evaluation results. J Aging Health. 2005;17(4):443–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cooper H, Spencer-Dawe E, McLean E. Beginning the process of teamwork: design, implementation and evaluation of an inter-professional education intervention for first year undergraduate students. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(5):492–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, Wang H, Dongilli T. Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):326–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Featherstone P, Smith GB, Linnell M, Easton S, Osgood VM. Impact of a one-day inter-professional course (ALERT) on attitudes and confidence in managing critically ill adult patients. Resuscitation. 2005;65(3):329–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hope JM, Lugassy D, Meyer R, et al. Bringing interdisciplinary and multicultural team building to health care education: the downstate team-building initiative. Acad Med. 2005;80(1):74–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shapiro MJ, Morey JC, Small SD, et al. Simulation based teamwork training for emergency department staff: does it improve clinical team performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(6):417–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stoller JK, Rose M, Lee R, Dolgan C, Hoogwerf BJ. Teambuilding and leadership training in an internal medicine residency training program. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(6):692–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Evans DV, Egnew TR. Outdoor-based leadership training and group development of family practice interns. Fam Med. 1997;29(7):471–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dienst ER, Byl N. Evaluation of an educational program in health care teams. J Community Health. 1981;6(4):282–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hawryluck LA, Espin SL, Garwood KC, Evans CA, Lingard LA. Pulling together and pushing apart: tides of tension in the ICU team. Acad Med. 2002;771803:S73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Singh H, Thomas E, Petersen L, Studdert D. Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(19):2030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA. 2001;286(20):2578–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73(4):403–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hundert EM, Hafferty F, Christakis D. Characteristics of the informal curriculum and trainees’ ethical choices. Acad Med. Acad Med. 1996;71(6):624–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Davis D, Mazmanian P, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe K, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chayan Chakraborti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Romsai T. Boonyasai
    • 2
  • Scott M. Wright
    • 2
  • David E. Kern
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Hospital MedicineThe George Washington University HospitalWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Internal MedicineJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical CenterBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations