Barriers to Screening Colonoscopy for Low-income Latino and White Patients in an Urban Community Health Center
- 561 Downloads
Colonoscopy is a screening modality for the early detection of colonic polyps and cancers but is underutilized, particularly among minorities.
To identify potential barriers to screening colonoscopy among low income Latino and white non-Latino patients in an urban community health center.
Design, participants, and approach
We conducted semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of patients 53 to 70 years old, eligible for colorectal cancer screening that spoke English or Spanish. Open-ended questions explored knowledge, beliefs, and experience with or reasons for not having screening colonoscopy. We performed content analysis of transcripts using established qualitative techniques.
Of 40 participants recruited, 57% were women, 55% Latino, 20% had private health insurance, and 40% had a prior colonoscopy. Participants described a wide range of barriers categorized into 5 major themes: (1) System barriers including scheduling, financial, transportation, and language difficulties; (2) Fear of pain or complications of colonoscopy and fear of diagnosis (cancer); (3) Lack of desire or motivation, including “laziness” and “procrastination”; (4) Dissuasion by others influencing participants’ decision regarding colonoscopy; and (5) Lack of provider recommendation including not hearing about colonoscopy or not understanding the preparation instructions.
Understanding of the range of barriers to colorectal cancer screening can help develop multimodal interventions to increase colonoscopy rates for all patients including low-income Latinos. Interventions including systems improvements and navigator programs could address barriers by assisting patients with scheduling, insurance issues, and transportation and providing interpretation, education, emotional support, and motivational interviewing.
KEY WORDScolon cancer screening colonoscopy Latino barriers patient navigation cultural competency qualitative
The authors would like to thank Elyse Park for help with the qualitative methodology and Sarah Abernathy-Oo and Joan Quinlan for assisting in the early conceptualization of the study and ongoing support. This paper was presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Society of General Medicine in April 2007. This study was funded by Jane’s Trust and the Clinical Innovation Award: Translating Clinical Insights into Improved Patient Care at the Massachusetts General Hospital.
Conflict of Interest
- 5.American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2006.Google Scholar
- 6.U.S. Preventive Services Task Forces. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006.Google Scholar
- 10.Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003.Google Scholar
- 20.Wolf R, Zybert P, Brouse C, et al. Knowledge, beliefs, and barriers relevant to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population: a pilot study. Fam Commun Health. 2001;24(3):34–47. Oct.Google Scholar
- 24.James A, Campbell M, Hudson M. Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev. 2002;11(6):529–34. Jun.Google Scholar
- 27.Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, eds. Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge; 1993:173–94.Google Scholar
- 41.Morgan C, Park E, Cortes D. Beliefs, knowledge, and behavior about cancer among urban Hispanic women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;18:57–63. (Monographs).Google Scholar