Racial Segregation and Disparities in Cancer Stage for Seniors
Disparities in cancer survival may be related to differences in stage. Segregation may be associated with disparities in stage, particularly for cancers for which screening promotes survival.
The objective of the study was to examine whether segregation modifies racial/ethnic disparities in stage.
The design of the study was analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare data for seniors with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer (n = 410,870).
Measurements and main results
The outcome was early- versus late-stage diagnosis. Area of residence was categorized into 4 groups: low segregation/high income (potentially the most advantaged), high segregation/high income, low segregation/low income, and high segregation/low income (possibly the most disadvantaged). Blacks were less likely than whites to be diagnosed with early-stage breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer, regardless of area. For colorectal cancer, the black/white disparity was largest in low-segregation/low-income areas (black/white odds ratio [OR] of early stage 0.51) and smallest in the most segregated areas (ORs 0.71 and 0.74, P < .005). Differences in disparities in stage by area category were not apparent for breast, prostate, or lung cancer. Whereas there were few Hispanic–white differences in early-stage diagnosis, the Hispanic/white disparity in early-stage diagnosis of breast cancer was largest in low-segregation/low-income areas (Hispanic/white OR of early stage 0.54) and smallest in high-segregation/low-income areas (OR 0.96, P < .05 compared to low-segregation/low-income areas).
Disparities in stages for cancers with an established screening test were smaller in more segregated areas.
KEY WORDSrace ethnicity cancer stage segregation
- 1.Fried VM, Prager K, MacKay AP, Xia H. Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans: Health, United States, 2003. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003.Google Scholar
- 2.Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1999. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2002.Google Scholar
- 16.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. US Preventative Services Task Force. Accessed January 29, 2008, at http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm.
- 17.American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society; 2006. Accessed January 29, 2008, 2006, at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2006PWSecured.pdf.
- 26.Massey DS. Residential segregation neighborhood conditions in U.S. metropolitan areas. In: Smelser NJ, Wilson WJ, Mitchell F, eds. America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2001:391–428.Google Scholar
- 34.Population Studies Center. Racial Residential Segregation Measurement Project. Population Studies Center, University of Michigan; 2000. Accessed January 29, 2008, at http://enceladus.isr.umich.edu/race/racestart.asp.
- 39.Lawson HW, Henson R, Bobo JK, Kaeser MK. Implementing recommendations for the early detection of breast and cervical cancer among low-income women. Oncology (Williston Park). 2000;14(11)1528–30. 638, 641–2 passim.Google Scholar
- 40.Bhargavan M, Sunshine J. Location decisions of mammography facilities: racial/ethnic disparities across zip-codes. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Economics of Population Health: Inaugural Conference of the American Society of Health Economists, TBA, Madison, WI, USA, June 4, 2006.Google Scholar
- 50.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighborhood safety and the prevalence of physical inactivity–selected states, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48(7)143–6.Google Scholar