Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 964–968 | Cite as

A Professional Development Course for the Clinical Clerkships: Developing a Student-Centered Curriculum

  • Laura E. Hill-Sakurai
  • Christina A. Lee
  • Adam Schickedanz
  • John Maa
  • Cindy J. Lai
Innovations in Education



Although professional development is addressed throughout the medical school curriculum, it is particularly salient to third-year students as they become integral members of health care teams.


We present a professional development curriculum for third-year medical students.


Urban medical school.

Program Description

In 2005, our curriculum consisted of 3 large group panels, each followed by a small group, occurring after the first, third, and last clerkship. Before each small group, students prepared critical incident reports, which led to focused group reflection. The individual topics were, respectively: (1) transition to clerkship learning; (2) challenges to professional behavior; and (3) medical errors. In 2006, based on student feedback, we piloted a revised student-centered panel on professionalism that was based entirely on themes from students’ critical incident reports.

Program Evaluation

Students rated the curriculum well overall. In 2005–2006, the small groups ranged from 3.95 to 3.98 (SD 0.88) on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) and the panels ranged from 3.54 to 4.41 (SD 0.9). The pilot panel in 2006 was rated 4.38 (SD 0.80). The most common professionalism themes generated from 185 critical incident reports were communication, compassionate patient care, accountability, and team collaboration.


A professional development curriculum, consisting of panels, small groups, and critical incident reports, can promote reflection among third-year medical students.


medical school curriculum third-year medical students professional development evaluation 


  1. 1.
    Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts LW, Green Hammond KA, Geppert CM, Warner TD. The positive role of professionalism and ethics training in medical education: a comparison of medical student and resident perspectives. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28(3):170–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LCME. Liaison Committee of Medical Education. updated 27 July 2007. Available at:, 2007.
  4. 4.
    Kao A, Lim M, Spevick J, Barzansky B. Teaching and evaluating students' professionalism in US medical schools, 2002–2003. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1151–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffith CH 3rd, Wilson JF. The loss of student idealism in the 3rd-year clinical clerkships. Eval Health Prof. 2001;24(1):61–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al. An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school. Med Educ. 2004;38(9):934–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Teaching professionalism: general principles. Med Teach. 2006;28(3):205–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ber R, Alroy G. Teaching professionalism with the aid of trigger films. Med Teach. 2002;24(5):528–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simpson D. Critical teaching incident casebook: Advancing the scholarship of teaching through critical analyses and reflection of ACGME competency based teaching cases. Available at:
  10. 10.
    Krackov SK, Levin RI, Catanese V, et al. Medical humanities at New York University School of Medicine: an array of rich programs in diverse settings. Acad Med. 2003;78(10):977–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Branch WT, Jr. Use of critical incident reports in medical education. A perspective. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(11):1063–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Branch WT, Pels RJ, Harper G, et al. A new educational approach for supporting the professional development of third-year medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(12):691–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Litzelman DK, Cottingham AH. The new formal competency-based curriculum and informal curriculum at Indiana University School of Medicine: overview and five-year analysis. Acad Med. 2007;82(4):410–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baernstein A, Fryer-Edwards K. Promoting reflection on professionalism: a comparison trial of educational interventions for medical students. Acad Med. 2003;78(7):742–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henderson E, Hogan H, Grant A, Berlin A. Conflict and coping strategies: a qualitative study of student attitudes to significant event analysis. Med Educ. 2003;37(5):438–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mofidi M, Strauss , Pitner LL, Sandler ES. Dental students' reflections on their community-based experiences: the use of critical incidents. J Dent Educ. 2003;67(5):515–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches.. 2Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications; 2003.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; ; 1983.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones WS, Hanson JL, Longacre JL. An intentional modeling process to teach professional behavior: students' clinical observations of preceptors. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(3):264–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Branch W, Pels RJ, Lawrence RS, Arky R. Becoming a doctor. Critical-incident reports from third-year medical students. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(15):1130–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagner P, Hendrich J, Moseley G, Hudson V. Defining medical professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2007;41(3):288–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura E. Hill-Sakurai
    • 1
    • 5
  • Christina A. Lee
    • 2
  • Adam Schickedanz
    • 3
  • John Maa
    • 4
  • Cindy J. Lai
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.500 Parnassus MU3ESan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations