Variation in Internal Medicine Residency Clinic Practices: Assessing Practice Environments and Quality of Care
- First Online:
Few studies have systematically and rigorously examined the quality of care provided in educational practice sites.
The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the patient population cared for by trainees in internal medicine residency clinics; (2) assess the quality of preventive cardiology care provided to these patients; (3) characterize the practice-based systems that currently exist in internal medicine residency clinics; and (4) examine the relationships between quality, practice-based systems, and features of the program: size, type of program, and presence of an electronic medical record.
This is a cross-sectional observational study.
This study was conducted in 15 Internal Medicine residency programs (23 sites) throughout the USA.
The participants included site champions at residency programs and 709 residents.
Abstracted charts provided data about patient demographics, coronary heart disease risk factors, processes of care, and clinical outcomes. Patients completed surveys regarding satisfaction. Site teams completed a practice systems survey.
Chart abstraction of 4,783 patients showed substantial variability across sites. On average, patients had between 3 and 4 of the 9 potential risk factors for coronary heart disease, and approximately 21% had at least 1 important barrier of care. Patients received an average of 57% (range, 30–77%) of the appropriate interventions. Reported satisfaction with care was high. Sites with an electronic medical record showed better overall information management (81% vs 27%) and better modes of communication (79% vs 43%).
This study has provided insight into the current state of practice in residency sites including aspects of the practice environment and quality of preventive cardiology care delivered. Substantial heterogeneity among the training sites exists. Continuous measurement of the quality of care provided and a better understanding of the training environment in which this care is delivered are important goals for delivering high quality patient care.
KEY WORDSpractice-based learning systems-based practice quality of care preventive cardiology Internal Medicine residency
- 1.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Web Site. Available at http://www.acgme.org. Accessed April 15, 2006.
- 2.American Board of Internal Medicine Web Site. Available at http://www.abim.org. Accessed May 26, 2006.
- 4.Holmboe ES, Bowen JD, Green M, Gregg J, DiFrancesco L, Reynolds E, Alguire P, Battinelli B, Lucey C, Duffy FD. Reforming internal medicine residency training: a report from the Society of General Internal Medicine’s task force for residency reform. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(12)11:65–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Web Site. Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines. Accessed April 15, 2006.
- 12.American College of Cardiology, Clinical Statements and Practice Guidelines. Available at http://www.acc.org. Accessed June 22, 2006.
- 16.Annual Report of the National CAHPS® Benchmarking Database, 2000 Annual Report. What consumers say about the quality of their health plans and medical care. Available at http://ncbd.cahps.org/Annual_Report/NCBDrepa.htm. Accessed May 22, 2006.
- 18.Moen R. A Guide to Idealized Design. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2002.Google Scholar
- 19.Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Put Prevention into Practice: Education and Action Kit. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1994.Google Scholar
- 20.Duffy FD, Lynn L, Didura H, Hess BJ, Caverzagie K, Grosso LJ, Lipner RS, Holmboe ES. Self Assessment of Practice Performance: Development of the ABIM Practice Improvement Module (PIM). J Cont Educ Health Prof. In press.Google Scholar
- 21.Center for Study Health System Change. Available at http://www.hschange.com. Accessed May 22, 2006.
- 24.Audet AM, Doty MM, Peugh J, Shamasdin J, Zapert K, Schoenbaum S. Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians’ black bags? Med Gen Med. 2004;642.Google Scholar
- 26.Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2001.Google Scholar