Between Two Worlds: A Multi-Institutional Qualitative Analysis of Students’ Reflections on Joining the Medical Profession
- 158 Downloads
Recent changes in healthcare system and training mandates have altered the clinical learning environment. We incorporated reflective writing into Internal Medicine clerkships (IMcs) in multiple institutions so students could consider the impact of clerkship experiences on their personal and professional development. We analyzed student reflections to inform curricula and support learning.
We qualitatively analyzed the reflections of students at 3 US medical schools during IMcs (N = 292) to identify themes, tone, and reflective quality using an iterative approach. Chi-square tests assessed differences between these factors and across institutions.
Students openly described powerful experiences. Major themes focused on 4 categories: personal issues (PI), professional development (PD), relational issues (RI), and medical care (MC). Each major theme was represented at each institution, although with significant variability between institutions in many of the subcategories including student role (PI), development-as-a-physician (PD), professionalism (PD) (p < 0.001). Students used positive tones to describe student role, development-as-a-physician and physician–patient relationship (PD) (p < 0.01–0.001), and negative tones for quality and safety (MC) (p < 0.05). Only 4% of writings coded as professionalism had a positive tone. Students employed a “reporting” voice in writing about clinical problem-solving, healthcare systems, and quality/safety (MC).
Reflection is considered important to professional development. Our analysis suggests that students at 3 institutions reflect on similar experiences. Theme variability across institutions implies curricula should be tailored to local culture. Reflective quality analysis suggests students are better equipped to reflect on certain experiences over others, which may impact learning. Student reflections can function as a mirror for our organizations, offer institutional feedback for support and improvement, and inform curricula for learners and faculty.
KEY WORDSmedical education clinical learning environment qualitative analysis students’ reflections physician–patient relationship
Funding: Dr. Fischer was funded by the Sarah L Stone Endowed Fellowship in Medical Education, University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Conflict of Interest
- 1.Wordreference. Available at: http://www.wordreference.com/definition/reflection (accessed September 29, 2007).
- 2.Schon DA. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Josey-Bass; 1987.Google Scholar
- 3.Groopman J. How Doctors Think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co; 2007.Google Scholar
- 5.Jay JK. Quality teaching: reflection as the heart of practice. Lanham Md.: Scarecrow Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 6.Hammond KR. Intuitive and analytic cognition: information models. In: Sage A, ed. Concise Encyclopedia of Information Processing in Systems and Organizations. England: Pergamon Press; 1990:306–12.Google Scholar
- 15.Institute of Medicine (IOM). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/CMS/8089/5575.aspx (accessed September 29, 2007).
- 16.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Outcomes Project. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/Outcome/ (accessed September 29, 2007).
- 18.Caldicott CV, Faber-Langendoen K. Deception, discrimination, and fear of reprisal: lessons in ethics from third-year medical students. Acad Med. 2005;80(9):866–73.Google Scholar