Community-based Preferences for Stool Cards versus Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening
- 213 Downloads
In the United States, compliance with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations remains suboptimal. Professional organizations advocate use of shared decision making in screening test discussions, but strategies to facilitate informed choice in CRC screening have not been well elucidated.
The objectives of the study were to determine screening test preference among colonoscopy-naïve adults after considering a detailed, written presentation of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and colonoscopy and to assess whether their preferences are associated with demographic characteristics, attitudes, and knowledge.
The design of the study was a cross-sectional survey.
Colonoscopy-naïve supermarket shoppers age 40–79 in low- and middle-income, multiethnic neighborhoods in Denver, CO, reviewed a detailed, side-by-side description of FOBT and colonoscopy and answered questions about test preference, strength of preference, influence of physician recommendation, basic knowledge of CRC, and demographic characteristics.
Measurements and Main Results
Descriptive statistics characterized the sample, and bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses identified correlates of screening test preference. In a diverse sample of 323 colonoscopy-naïve adults, 53% preferred FOBT, and 47% preferred colonoscopy for CRC screening. Individuals of Latino ethnicity and those with lower educational attainment were more likely to prefer FOBT than non-Latino whites and those with at least some college. Almost half of the respondents felt “very strongly” about their preferences, and one third said they would adhere to their choice regardless of physician recommendation.
After considering a detailed, side-by-side comparison of the FOBT and colonoscopy, a large proportion of community-dwelling, colonoscopy-naïve adults prefer FOBT over colonoscopy for CRC screening. In light of professional guidelines and time-limited primary care visits, it is important to develop improved ways of facilitating informed patient decision making for CRC screening.
KEY WORDScolorectal cancer screening colonoscopy fecal occult blood testing patient preferences informed decision-making
This study was supported in part by an American Cancer Research Scholar Grant in Cancer Control: Psychosocial and Behavioral Research MRSG-06-081-01-CPPB (Denberg, PI). Connolly Butterfield provided assistance with survey collection.
Conflict of Interest
- 3.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–31.Google Scholar
- 12.Centers for Disease Control. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Prevalence data: adults aged 50 who have had a blood stool test within the past two years; 2006. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/display_c.asp?yr_c = 2002&yr = 2006&cat = CC&state = US&bkey = 20060032&qkey = 4424&qtype = C&grp = 0&SUBMIT2 = Compare (accessed August 8, 2007).
- 22.American Statistics Association. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA; 1995:1075–1080.Google Scholar
- 25.Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Screening for colorectal cancer—United States, 1997. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:116–21.Google Scholar
- 31.The Multicentre Australian Colorectal-neoplasia Screening (MACS) Group. A comparison of colorectal neoplasia screening tests: a multicentre community-based study of the impact of consumer choice. Med J Aust. 2006;184:546–50.Google Scholar
- 32.Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, Arrigoni A, Bisanti L, Cardelli A, Castiglione G, Crosta C, DiPlacido , Ferrari A, Ferraris , Ferrero F, Fracchia M, Gasperoni S, Malfitana G, Recchia S, Risio M, Rizzetto M, Saracco G, Spandre M, Turco D, Turco P, Zappa M. Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:347–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar