Acute Myocardial Infarction Length of Stay and Hospital Mortality Are Not Associated with Language Preference
- First Online:
- 63 Downloads
Language barriers between patients and providers may influence the process and quality of care.
To examine the association of language preference with length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality for patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Electronic administrative hospital discharge data for all non-disabled Medicaid beneficiaries age 35 years and older admitted to all acute care California hospitals with a diagnosis of AMI between 1994 and 1998.
We used multivariate regression to explore whether observed differences in the hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality between non-English preference (NEP) and English preference (EP) individuals could be explained by individual and/or hospital level factors. We adjusted for patient level characteristics using 24 covariates from a previously validated prediction model of mortality after hospitalization for AMI.
Of 12,609 Medicaid patients across 401 California hospitals, 2,757 (22%) had NEP. NEP was associated with a 3.9% increased LOS (95% CI 0.7, 7.1; p = 0.02) in unadjusted analysis and a 3.8% increased LOS (95% CI 0.3, 7.3; p = 0.03) after controlling for patient level characteristics. Differences in LOS were no longer significant after adjusting receipt of cardiac procedure/ surgery (2.8%; 95% CI −0.6, 6.2; p = 0.1) or after adjusting for hospital (0.9%; 95% CI −2.5, 4.3; p = 0.6). Non-English language preference was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in unadjusted analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.80; 95% CI 0.69, 0.94; p = 0.005), but was not significant after adjusting for patient level characteristics (adjusted OR [AOR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.78, 1.27; p = 0.6). Adjusting for receipt of cardiac procedure/ surgery (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.79, 1.18; p = 0.7) and hospital (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78; 1.21; p = 0.8) did not alter this finding.
Language preference is not associated with AMI mortality, and the small increase in length of stay associated with non-English preference is accounted for by hospital level factors. Our results suggest that system level differences are important to consider in studies of the effect of language barriers in the health care setting.
KEY WORDSlanguage preference communication limited English proficient language barrier
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. QT-02. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics, 2000.Google Scholar
- 12.Drennan G. Counting the costs of language services in psychiatry. S Afr Med J. 1996;86:344–5.Google Scholar
- 13.Vasquez C, Javier R. The problem with interpreters: communicating with Spanish-speaking patients. Hospital & Community Psychiatry. 1991;42:163–5.Google Scholar
- 17.Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. Errors and Acceptance of California Patient Discharge Data Reporting Manual, 3rd Edition. Sacramento, CA: Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, 2000.Google Scholar
- 18.Health Care and Analysis Division. Report on Heart Attack Outcomes in California 1996-1998, Volume 2: Technical Guide, Sacramento, California: California Office of Statewide Planning and Development, February 2002.Google Scholar