Barriers of and Facilitators to Physician Recommendation of Colorectal Cancer Screening
- 372 Downloads
Colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) has been demonstrated to be effective and is consistently recommended by clinical practice guidelines. However, only slightly over half of all Americans have ever been screened. Patients cite physician recommendation as the most important motivator of screening. This study explored the barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS.
A 3-component qualitative study to explore the barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS: in-depth, semistructured interviews with 29 purposively sampled, community- and academic-based primary care physicians; chart-stimulated recall, a technique that utilizes patient charts to probe physician recall and provide context about the barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS during actual clinic encounters; and focus groups with 18 academic primary care physicians. Grounded theory techniques of analysis were used.
All the participating physicians were aware of and recommended CRCS. The overwhelmingly preferred test was colonoscopy. Barriers of physician recommendation of CRCS included patient comorbidities, prior patient refusal of screening, physician forgetfulness, acute care visits, lack of time, and lack of reminder systems and test tracking systems. Facilitators to physician recommendation of CRCS included patient request, patient age 50–59, physician positive attitudes about CRCS, physician prioritization of screening, visits devoted to preventive health, reminders, and incentives.
There are multiple physician, patient, and system barriers to recommending CRCS. Thus, interventions may need to target barriers at multiple levels to successfully increase physician recommendation of CRCS.
KEY WORDSphysician practice patterns colorectal cancer screening mass screening physician–patient relation communication barriers
- 3.Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003:544–60.Google Scholar
- 4.Pignone M, Levin B. Recent developments in colorectal cancer screening and prevention. Am Fam Physician. 2002:297–302.Google Scholar
- 6.Center for Disease Control (CDC). Increased use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002 and 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(11):308–11.Google Scholar
- 17.Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, Jones E, Nadel M, Vernon SW. A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med. 2003:352–62.Google Scholar
- 29.Maatsch JL. Predictive validity of medical specialty examinations. Final report to NCHSR Grant No.: HS02039-04. 1983.Google Scholar
- 33.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.Google Scholar
- 34.Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001;39(8):Supplement 2:II-2–II-45.Google Scholar
- 38.Oxman AD, Thompson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No Magic Bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;153(10):1423–31.Google Scholar
- 41.Austin S, Balas E, Mitchell J, Ewigman B. Effect of physician reminders on preventive care: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. In: JG O, ed. Proceedings for 18th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1994: 121–4.Google Scholar
- 48.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. One-time “welcome to medicare” physical exam. http://www.medicare.gov/health/physicalexam.asp. Accessed on May 19, 2007; 2007.
- 49.Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641–51.Google Scholar
- 50.COMMAND (Comorbid Disease Management Database). http://www.iqh.org/index.php?area=command&topic=101671. Mississippi Quality Improvement Organization.