Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 10, pp 1463–1466

Providing Patients Web-based Data to Inform Physician Choice: If You Build It, Will They Come?

  • Gary Fanjiang
  • Ted von Glahn
  • Hong Chang
  • William H. Rogers
  • Dana Gelb Safran
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Despite growing emphasis on public reporting of health care quality data, available data are often ignored.

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of web-based physician-level data for patients choosing a new primary care physician (PCP).

Design

Patients seeking a new PCP (n = 2225) were invited to view web-based information including PCP credentials, personal characteristics, office location and hours, and patient experience scores. Patient experience scores included validated measures of interpersonal quality, appointment access, care coordination, health promotion, and patient recommendations of the PCP. After viewing the website, participants indicated their preferred PCP and completed a study questionnaire.

Results

Of the invited participants, 17% visited the website (n = 382). Patient experience scores were cited most frequently as important to physician choice (51%). Among these measures, patients’ highest priorities were interpersonal quality (37%) and patient recommendations of the PCP (41%). For patients citing these priorities, the odds of choosing a highly scored physician after viewing the data was nearly 10 times that of choosing such a physician by chance (odds ratio (OR) = 9.52 and 9.71, respectively).

Conclusions

Targeting patients known to be making a health care decision appears to promote the use of performance data. Patients particularly valued data concerning other patients’ experiences and, after viewing the data, made choices well-aligned with their priorities.

KEY WORDS

health care decision-making physician performance measures public reporting patient care experience measures 

References

  1. 1.
    Farley DO, Elliott MN, Short PF, Damiano P, Kanouse DE, Hays RD. Effect of CAHPS performance information on health plan choices by Iowa Medicaid beneficiaries. Med Care Res Rev. 2002;59:319–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH. The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. JAMA. 2000;283:1866–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. JAMA. 1998;279:1638–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schauffler HH, Mordavsky JK. Consumer reports in health care: do they make a difference? Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:69–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isaacs SL. Consumer’s information needs: results of a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood, Va.) 1996;15:31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ. What type of quality information do consumers want in a health care report card? Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53:28–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ. Will quality report cards help consumers? Health Aff (Millwood, Va.) 1997;16:218–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Jollis JG, Peterson ED. Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough? Health Serv Res. 1997;31:659–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:251–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibbs DA, Sangl JA, Burrus B. Consumer perspectives on information needs for health plan choice. Health Care Financ Rev. 1996;18:55–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hibbard JH, Peters E. Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:413–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ. Will quality report cards help consumers? Health Aff (Millwood, Va.) 1997;16:218–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Safran DG, Karp M, Coltin K, Chang H, Li A, Ogren J, Rogers WH. Measuring patients’ experiences with individual primary care physicians. Results of a statewide demonstration project. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:13–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriguez HP, von Glahn T, Rogers WH, Chang H, Fanjiang G, Safran DG. Evaluating patients’ experiences with individual physicians: a randomized trial of mail, internet, and interactive voice response telephone administration of surveys. Med Care. 2006;44:167–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Safran DG. Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:248–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stewart MA. Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cleary PD. The increasing importance of patient surveys. Qual Health Care. 1999;8:212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fung CH, Elliott MN, Hays RD, Kahn KL, Kanouse DE, McGlynn EA, Spranca MD, Shekelle PG. Patients’ preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:957–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) website. Accessed on: April 16, 2007. http://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/content/products/CG/PROD_CG_CG40Products.asp.
  20. 20.
    National Quality Form (NQF) Website. Standardizing Ambulatory Care Performance Measures. Accessed on: April 16, 2007. http://www.qualityforum.org/projects/ongoing/ambulatory/index.asp.

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Fanjiang
    • 1
  • Ted von Glahn
    • 2
  • Hong Chang
    • 3
  • William H. Rogers
    • 3
  • Dana Gelb Safran
    • 3
  1. 1.Massachusetts General Hospital for ChildrenBostonUSA
  2. 2.Pacific Business Group on HealthSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.The Health InstituteTufts-New England Medical CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations