Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 742–748

Predictors of the Growing Influence of Clinical Practice Guidelines

  • Ann S. O’Malley
  • Hoangmai H. Pham
  • James D. Reschovsky
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Despite the proliferation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), physicians have been slow to adopt them.

Objective

Describe changes in the reported effect of CPGs on physicians’ clinical practice over the past decade, and identify the practice characteristics associated with those changes.

Design and Participants

Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses of rounds 1–4 of the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey, a nationally representative survey, conducted periodically between 1996 and 2005.

Measurements

The cross-sectional outcome was the reported effect of CPGs on the physician’s practice (very large, large, moderate, small, very small, and no effect). The longitudinal outcome was the change in reported effect of CPGs between two consecutive rounds for panel respondents. Independent variables included changes in physicians’ practice characteristics (size, ownership, capitation, availability of information technology (IT) to access guidelines, whether quality measures and profiling affect compensation, and revenue sources).

Results

The proportion of primary care physicians reporting that CPGs had a very large or large effect on their practice increased significantly from 1997 to 2005, from 16.4% to 38.7% (P < .0001). The corresponding change for specialists was 18.9% to 28.2% (P < .0001). In longitudinal multivariate analyses, practice characteristics associated with an increase in effect of CPGs included acquiring IT to access guidelines, an increase in the impact that quality measures and profiling have on compensation, and an increase in the proportion of practice revenue under capitation or derived from Medicaid.

Conclusions

Promotion of wider adoption of health IT, and financial incentives linked to validated quality measures, may facilitate further growth in the impact of CPGs.

KEY WORDS

practice guidelines financial incentives quality 

References

  1. 1.
    Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(11):956–63 (Jun 1).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flores G, Lee M, Bauchner H, Kastner B. Pediatricians’ attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding clinical practice guidelines: a national survey. Pediatrics. 2000;105(3 Pt 1):496–501 (Mar).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, McKibbon KA, Carter AO. Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997;156(12):1715–23 (Jun 15).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wolfe RM, Sharp LK, Wang RM. Family physicians’ opinions and attitudes to three clinical practice guidelines. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(2):150–7 (Mar–Apr).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ornstein S, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ, et al. A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(7):523–32 (Oct 5).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641–51 (May 7).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaix-Couturier C, Durand-Zaleski I, Jolly D, Durieux P. Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12(2):133–42 (Apr).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoenman J, Berk M, Feldman J, Singer A. Impact of differential response rates on the quality of data collected in the CTS physician survey. J Eval Health Prof. 2003;26(1):23–42 (Mar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Reschovsky J, Hadley J. Physician Financial Incentives: Use of Quality Incentives Inches Up: But Productivity Still Dominates. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change: 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hillman AL, Pauly MV, Kerstein JJ. How do financial incentives affect physicians’ clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations? N Engl J Med. 1989;321(2):86–92 (Jul 13).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Armour BS, Pitts MM, Maclean R, et al. The effect of explicit financial incentives on physician behavior. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(10):1261–6 (May 28).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cunningham PJ, May JH. Medicaid patients increasingly concentrated among physicians. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change: 2006; tracking report no. 16 (Aug).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC. Measure, learn, and improve: physicians’ involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(3):843–53 (May–Jun).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grossman JM, Reed MC. Clinical information technology gaps persist among physicians. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change: 2006; issue brief no. 106 (Nov).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adams AS, Soumerai SB, Lomas J, Ross-Degnan D. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11(3):187–92 (Jun).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Casalino LP. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. New Engl J Med. 1999;341:1147–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294(6):716–24 (Aug 10).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramsey SD. Economic analyses and clinical practice guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:235–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Malley AS, Clancy C, Thompson J, Meyer G. Clinical practice guidelines vs. Performance measures: where do they differ and does it matter? Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30(3):163–71 (Mar).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Zhonghe L, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance. JAMA. 2005;294:1788–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Solberg LI, Taylor N, Conway WA, Hiatt RA. Large multispecialty group practices and quality improvement: what is needed to transform care? J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30(1):9–17 (Jan–Mar).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann S. O’Malley
    • 1
  • Hoangmai H. Pham
    • 1
  • James D. Reschovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Studying Health System ChangeWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations