Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 614–619 | Cite as

What are the Essential Elements to Enable Patient Participation in Medical Decision Making?

Original Article



Patient participation in shared decision making (SDM) results in increased patient knowledge, adherence, and improved outcomes. Despite the benefits of the SDM model, many patients do not attain the level of participation they desire.


To gain a more complete understanding of the essential elements, or the prerequisites, critical to active patient participation in medical decision making from the patient’s perspective.


Qualitative study.


Individual, in-depth patient interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. Two analysts independently read the transcripts and jointly developed a list of codes.


Twenty-six consecutive subjects drawn from community dwelling subjects undergoing bone density measurements.


Respondents’ experiences and beliefs related to patient participation in SDM.


Five elements were repeatedly described by respondents as being essential to enable patient participation in medical decision making: (1) patient knowledge, (2) explicit encouragement of patient participation by physicians, (3) appreciation of the patient’s responsibility/rights to play an active role in decision making, (4) awareness of choice, and (5) time.


The generalizability of the results is limited by the homogeneity of the study sample.


Our findings have important clinical implications and suggest that several needs must be met before patients can become active participants in decisions related to their health care. These needs include ensuring that patients (1) appreciate that there is uncertainty in medicine and “buy in” to the importance of active patient participation in decisions related to their health care, (2) understand the trade-offs related to available options, and (3) have the opportunity to discuss these options with their physician to arrive at a decision concordant with their values.


patient participation medical decision making shared decision making health care 


  1. 1.
    Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2003;140:54–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kassirer JP. Incorporating patients’ preferences into medical decisions. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1895–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE, Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al. Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2701–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P, Thornhill D, Macfarlane R, Hubbard R. Reducing antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in primary care: blinded, randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflet. BMJ. 2002;324:91–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, Ryckman R, Crebolder H. Provider–patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patients self-care and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51:17–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ward MM, Sundaramurthy S, Lotstein D, Bush TM, Neuwelt CM, Street RJ. Participatory patient–physician communication and morbidity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:810–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Street RL, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:298–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Souchek J, Stacks JR, Brody B, et al. A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: results from the initial visit. Med Care. 2000;38:1040–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1865–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bilodeau BA, Degner LF. Information needs, sources of information, and decisional roles in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:691–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997;277:1485–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1473–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Till JE. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989;82:260–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caress AL. Patient roles in decision-making. Nurs Times. 1997;93:45–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision-making. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions-challenges for doctors. BMJ. 2003;327:542–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005;43:960–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink DR. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(5):729–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krueger RA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weitzman EA. Software and qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kraetschmer N, Sharpe N, Urowitz S, Deber RB. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making? Health Expect. 2004;7:317–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McNutt RA. Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress. JAMA. 2004;292:2516–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003:CD001431.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VA Connecticut Healthcare SystemWest HavenUSA
  2. 2.Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.New England Research InstitutesWatertownUSA

Personalised recommendations