Political Self-characterization of U.S. Medical Students
There have been no prior studies of the political self-characterization of U.S. physicians-in-training, and little is known about physicians’ political leanings or the critical relationship between medical issues and political orientations of physicians and physicians-in-training.
All medical students in the class of 2003 at 16 nationally representative U.S. schools were eligible to complete three questionnaire administrations (at freshman orientation, entrance to wards, and senior year).
Among these medical students, 5% self-characterized as politically very conservative, 21% conservative, 33% moderate, 31% liberal, and 9% as very liberal.” Being male, white, Protestant, intending to specialize in Surgery or anesthesiology/pathology/radiology, or currently or previously being married significantly (P ≤ .001) increased the likelihood that a student self-identified as very conservative or conservative. Disagreement or strong disagreement with the statements, “I’m glad I chose to become a physician” and “Access to care is a fundamental human right,” were also both associated with being very conservative or conservative. Being more liberal was reported by blacks and Hispanics; those intending to become ob-gyns, psychiatrists, and pediatric subspecialists; and atheists, Jews, and adherents of eastern religions.
U.S. medical students are considerably more likely to be liberal than conservative and are more likely to be liberal than are other young U.S. adults. Future U.S. physicians may be more receptive to liberal messages than conservative ones, and their political orientation may profoundly affect their health system attitudes.
KEY WORDSmedical students physicians politics political orientation attitudes
Erica Frank, MD, MPH and Jennifer Carrera, MS had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Potential Conflict of Interest
- 1.American College of Physicians. Access to health care. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:641–61.Google Scholar
- 7.American Association of Medical Colleges. Matriculant age at anticipated matriculation, 1992–2001. AAMC Data Warehouse: applicant matriculant file; 1999–2001.Google Scholar
- 8.American Association of Medical Colleges. FACTS—applicants, matriculants, and graduates—new entrants by gender and race/ethnicity; 2000.Google Scholar
- 9.American Association of Medical Colleges. AAMC Data Warehouse: student records system as of December 12, 2000, reflecting those actively enrolled on October 31, 2000; 2001.Google Scholar
- 10.National Institutes of Health. Support to U.S. medical schools, fiscal year 2000; 2001.Google Scholar
- 11.Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys. The tailored design method, 2nd ed. New York, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2000.Google Scholar
- 12.Wright E, Elon L, Hertzberg VS, Stein AD, Frank E. Validation of a brief diet survey instrument among medical students. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;28(4):379–81.Google Scholar
- 13.Carlson DK. Gen Xers Go From Grunge to Gingrich. Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing; 8/26/2003, p 1.Google Scholar
- 14.Frank E. Political self-characterization of US women physicians. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1475–81.Google Scholar