Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 514–517 | Cite as

Political Self-characterization of U.S. Medical Students

  • Erica Frank
  • Jennifer Carrera
  • Shafik Dharamsi
Original Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been no prior studies of the political self-characterization of U.S. physicians-in-training, and little is known about physicians’ political leanings or the critical relationship between medical issues and political orientations of physicians and physicians-in-training.

METHODS

All medical students in the class of 2003 at 16 nationally representative U.S. schools were eligible to complete three questionnaire administrations (at freshman orientation, entrance to wards, and senior year).

RESULTS

Among these medical students, 5% self-characterized as politically very conservative, 21% conservative, 33% moderate, 31% liberal, and 9% as very liberal.” Being male, white, Protestant, intending to specialize in Surgery or anesthesiology/pathology/radiology, or currently or previously being married significantly (P ≤ .001) increased the likelihood that a student self-identified as very conservative or conservative. Disagreement or strong disagreement with the statements, “I’m glad I chose to become a physician” and “Access to care is a fundamental human right,” were also both associated with being very conservative or conservative. Being more liberal was reported by blacks and Hispanics; those intending to become ob-gyns, psychiatrists, and pediatric subspecialists; and atheists, Jews, and adherents of eastern religions.

CONCLUSIONS

U.S. medical students are considerably more likely to be liberal than conservative and are more likely to be liberal than are other young U.S. adults. Future U.S. physicians may be more receptive to liberal messages than conservative ones, and their political orientation may profoundly affect their health system attitudes.

KEY WORDS

medical students physicians politics political orientation attitudes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Erica Frank, MD, MPH and Jennifer Carrera, MS had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Potential Conflict of Interest

None disclosed

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Physicians. Access to health care. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:641–61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nathanson CA, Becker MH. Physician behavior as a determinant of utilization patterns: the case of abortion. Am J Public Health. 1978;68:1104–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maheux B, Pineault R, Beland F. Factors influencing physicians’ orientation toward prevention. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3:12–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Linn LS, Yager J. Factors associated with physician recognition and treatment of alcoholism. West J Med. 1989;150:468–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frank E, Rothenberg R, Lewis C, Beldoff BF. Correlates of physicians’ prevention-related practices: findings from the Women Physicians’ Health Study. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:359–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldman L. Factors related to physicians’ medical and political attitudes: a documentation of intraprofessional variations. J Health Soc Behav. 1974;15(3):177–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Association of Medical Colleges. Matriculant age at anticipated matriculation, 1992–2001. AAMC Data Warehouse: applicant matriculant file; 1999–2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Association of Medical Colleges. FACTS—applicants, matriculants, and graduates—new entrants by gender and race/ethnicity; 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    American Association of Medical Colleges. AAMC Data Warehouse: student records system as of December 12, 2000, reflecting those actively enrolled on October 31, 2000; 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Institutes of Health. Support to U.S. medical schools, fiscal year 2000; 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys. The tailored design method, 2nd ed. New York, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright E, Elon L, Hertzberg VS, Stein AD, Frank E. Validation of a brief diet survey instrument among medical students. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;28(4):379–81.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carlson DK. Gen Xers Go From Grunge to Gingrich. Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing; 8/26/2003, p 1.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frank E. Political self-characterization of US women physicians. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1475–81.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keane M. Beliefs about mental illness in a culturally diverse nursing student population: implications for education and practice. J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 1991;22(4):15–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burns JP, Mitchell C, Griffith JL, Truog RD. End-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit: attitudes and practices of pediatric critical care physicians and nurses. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(3):658–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stevens R. Law schools and law students. Va Law Rev. 1973;59:551–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica Frank
    • 1
  • Jennifer Carrera
    • 2
  • Shafik Dharamsi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Care and EpidemiologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Family and Preventive MedicineEmory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Centre for International HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations