Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 308–314 | Cite as

Missed Opportunities: Family History and Behavioral Risk Factors in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among a Multiethnic Group of Women

  • Leah S. Karliner
  • Anna Napoles-Springer
  • Karla Kerlikowske
  • Jennifer S. Haas
  • Steven E. Gregorich
  • Celia Patricia Kaplan
Original Article

Background

Clinician’s knowledge of a woman’s cancer family history (CFH) and counseling about health-related behaviors (HRB) is necessary for appropriate breast cancer care.

Objective

To evaluate whether clinicians solicit CFH and counsel women on HRB; to assess relationship of well visits and patient risk perception or worry with clinician’s behavior.

Design

Cross-sectional population-based telephone survey.

Participants

Multiethnic sample; 1,700 women from San Francisco Mammography Registry with a screening mammogram in 2001–2002.

Measurements

Predictors: well visit in prior year, self-perception of 10-year breast cancer risk, worry scale. Outcomes: Patient report of clinician asking about CFH in prior year, or ever counseling about HRB in relation to breast cancer risk. Multivariate models included age, ethnicity, education, language of interview, insurance/mammography facility, well visit, ever having a breast biopsy/follow-up mammography, Gail-Model risk, Jewish heritage, and body mass index.

Results

58% reported clinicians asked about CFH; 33% reported clinicians ever discussed HRB. In multivariate analysis, regardless of actual risk, perceived risk, or level of worry, having had a well visit in prior year was associated with increased odds (OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.6, 3.3) that a clinician asked about CFH. Regardless of actual risk of breast cancer, a higher level of worry (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.4, 2.6) was associated with increased odds that a clinician ever discussed HRB.

Conclusions

Clinicians are missing opportunities to elicit family cancer histories and counsel about health-related behaviors and breast cancer risk. Preventive health visits offer opportunities for clinicians to address family history, risk behaviors, and patients’ worries about breast cancer.

Key words

family history breast cancer risk assessment multiethnic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted with the support of the California Breast Cancer Research Program (grant number 6PB-0053) and the NCI-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cooperative Agreement (U01CA63740).

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

References

  1. 1.
    Sifri R, Gangadharappa S, Acheson LS. Identifying and testing for hereditary susceptibility to common cancers. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(6):309–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Summerton N, Garrood PV. The family history in family practice: a questionnaire study. Fam Pract. 1997;14(4):285–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gramling R, Nash J, Siren K, Eaton C, Culpepper L. Family physician self-efficacy with screening for inherited cancer risk. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(2):130–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acheson LS, Wiesner GL, Zyzanski SJ, Goodwin MA, Stange KC. Family history-taking in community family practice: implications for genetic screening. Genet Med. 2000;2(3):180–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pyeritz RE. Family history and genetic risk factors: forward to the future. JAMA. 1997;278(15):1284–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korde LA, Calzone KA, Zujewski J. Assessing breast cancer risk: genetic factors are not the whole story. Postgrad Med. 2004;116(4):6–8, 11–4, 19–20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. The Nurses’ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(5):388–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McTiernan A. Behavioral risk factors in breast cancer: can risk be modified? Oncologist. 2003;8(4):326–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McTiernan A, Kooperberg C, White E, et al. Recreational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Cohort Study. JAMA. 2003;290(10):1331–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K, et al. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer—collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(11):1234–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murff HJ, Spigel DR, Syngal S. Does this patient have a family history of cancer? An evidence-based analysis of the accuracy of family cancer history. JAMA. 2004;292(12):1480–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medalie JH, Zyzanski SJ, Langa D, Stange KC. The family in family practice: is it a reality? J Fam Pract. 1998;46(5):390–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haas JS, Kaplan CP, Gregorich SE, Perez-Stable EJ, Des Jarlais G. Do physicians tailor their recommendations for breast cancer risk reduction based on patient’s risk? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(4):302–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watson E, Clements A, Yudkin P, et al. Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(471):817–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38(2):166–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walsh JM, McPhee SJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: an analysis of factors influencing patient and physician. Health Educ Q. 1992;19(2):157–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woo B, Woo B, Cook EF, Weisberg M, Goldman L. Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians’ recommendations, patients’ desires, published guidelines, and actual practice. JAMA. 1985;254(11):1480–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DiLorenzo TA, Schnur J, Montgomery GH, Erblich J, Winkel G, Bovbjerg DH. A model of disease-specific worry in heritable disease: the influence of family history, perceived risk and worry about other illnesses. J Behav Med. 2006;29(1):37–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frojd C, Von Essen L. Is doctors’ ability to identify cancer patients’ worry and wish for information related to doctors’ self-efficacy with regard to communicating about difficult matters? Eur J Cancer Care. (Engl) 2006;15(4):371–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gramling R, Anthony D, Lowery J, et al. Association between screening family medical history in general medical care and lower burden of cancer worry among women with a close family history of breast cancer. Genet Med. 2005;7(9):640–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Des Jarlais G, Kaplan CP, Haas JS, Gregorich SE, Perez-Stable EJ, Kerlikowske K. Factors affecting participation in a breast cancer risk reduction telephone survey among women from four racial/ethnic groups. Prev Med. 2005;41(3–4):720–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haas JS, Kaplan CP, Des Jarlais G, Gildengoin V, Perez-Stable EJ, Kerlikowske K. Perceived risk of breast cancer among women at average and increased risk. J Women’s Health. (Larchmt) 2005;14(9):845–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaplan CP, Haas JS, Perez-Stable EJ, et al. Breast cancer risk reduction options: awareness, discussion, and use among women from four ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(1):162–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Livaudais JC, Kaplan CP, Haas JS, Perez-Stable EJ, Stewart S, Jarlais GD. Lifestyle behavior counseling for women patients among a sample of California physicians. J Women’s Health. (Larchmt) 2005;14(6):485–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    San Francisco Mammography Registry. In. San Franicsco; 2006.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Costantino JP, Gail MH, Pee D, et al. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91(18):1541–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81(24):1879–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    AHRQ. Screening for Breast Cancer. In: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; 2002.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, et al. Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(13):1074–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B, et al. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(4):286–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Likert RA. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nunnally JC. Measurement of Sentiments. In: Psychometric Theory: McGraw-Hill; 1978:602–7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    StataCorp. Stata’s User Guide Version 9. College Station, Texas: Stata Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Murff HJ, Byrne D, Haas JS, Puopolo AL, Brennan TA. Race and family history assessment for breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(1):75–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaplan CP, Haas JS, Perez-Stable EJ, Des Jarlais G, Gregorich SE. Factors affecting breast cancer risk reduction practices among California physicians. Prev Med. 2005;41(1):7–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bernstein AB, Hing E, Moss Aj, Allen KF, Siller AB, RB T. Health care in America: Trends in utilization. In: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Forrest CB, Whelan EM. Primary care safety-net delivery sites in the United States: a comparison of community health centers, hospital outpatient departments, and physicians’ offices. JAMA. 2000;284(16):2077–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    CDC. Family History Public Health Initiative. In: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Genomics and Disease Prevention.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grande GE, Hyland F, Walter FM, Kinmonth AL. Women’s views of consultations about familial risk of breast cancer in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(3):275–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nelson HD, Huffman LH, Fu R, Harris EL. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(5):362–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Warner E, Carroll JC, Heisey RE, et al. Educating women about breast cancer. An intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer. Can Fam Physician. 2003;49:56-63.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leah S. Karliner
    • 1
  • Anna Napoles-Springer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karla Kerlikowske
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Jennifer S. Haas
    • 6
  • Steven E. Gregorich
    • 1
  • Celia Patricia Kaplan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical Effectiveness Research Center for Diverse PopulationsUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.UCSF Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans’ AffairsUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  6. 6.Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations