Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 327–331 | Cite as

The Impact of an Evidence-Based Medicine Educational Intervention on Primary Care Physicians: A Qualitative Study

  • Kerem Shuval
  • Aviv Shachak
  • Shai Linn
  • Mayer Brezis
  • Paula Feder-Bubis
  • Shmuel Reis
Original Article

Background

Attitudes and barriers to implementing EBM have been examined extensively, but scant evidence exists regarding the impact of EBM teaching on primary care physicians’ point of care behavior.

Objective

Gaining insight into behavioral and attitudinal changes of facilitators and participants during a multifaceted EBM educational intervention.

Design, setting, and participants

A qualitative study on primary care physicians and facilitators from a large HMO selected from the intervention arm of a parallel controlled trial using purposeful sampling. We conducted focus groups with 13 facilitators and 17 physicians and semi-structured interviews with 10 facilitators and 11 physicians.

Results

Both facilitators and participants believed EBM enhanced the quality of their practice. The intervention affected attitudes and knowledge, but had little impact on physicians’ ability to utilize pre-appraised resources at the point of care. Using EBM resources during consultation was perceived to be a complex task and impractical in a busy setting. Conversely, a positive impact on using medication databases was noted. Medication databases were perceived as easy to use during consultations in which the benefits outweighed the barriers. The intervention prompted physicians to write down clinical questions more frequently and to search for answers at home.

Conclusions

This study underlines the need not only to enhance EBM skills, but also to improve the ease of use of EBM resources at the point of care. Tasks should be simplified by tailoring evidence-based information retrieval systems to the busy clinical schedule. Participants’ recommendations to establish an HMO decision support service should be considered.

Key words

evidence-based medicine primary care medical education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the primary care physicians and course facilitators who took part in the study. In addition, we thank The Galil Center for Medical Informatics and Telemedicine for giving administrative and logistic support. This paper was presented in The Second Israeli National Convention of Qualitative Research Methodologies on June 5th, 2006.

Financial Support

The Israel National Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research and the Roter Fund (Maccabi Health Services).

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Ethical Approval

An exemption from the Helsinki Committee [Institutional Review Board (IRB)] of the Emek Medical Center, Afoula, Israel.

References

  1. 1.
    Sackett D, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richarson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;313:71–2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dobbie AE, Schneider FD, Anderson AD, Littlefield J. What evidence supports teaching evidence based medicine? Acad Med. 2000;75:1184–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329:1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J. General practitioners’ perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1998;316:361–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mayer J, Piterman L. The attitudes of Australian GPs to evidence-based medicine: a focus group study. Fam Med. 1999;16:627–32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Putnam W, Twohig PL, Burge FI, Jackson LA, Cox JL. A quality study of evidence in primary care: what the practitioners are saying. CMAJ. 2002;166:1525–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Ansary LA, Khoja TA. The place of evidence based medicine among primary health care physicians in Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. Fam Pract. 2002;19:537–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hannse K, Leys M, Vermeire E, et al. Implementing evidence-based medicine in general practice: a focus group based study. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parkes J, Hyde C, Deeks J, Milne R. Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care setting. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001; Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001270. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD001270.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taylor R, Reeves B, Ewings P, Binns S, Keast J, Mears R. A systematic review of the critical appraisal skills training for clinicians. Medical Education. 2000;34:120–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Straus SE. What’s the E for EBM? BMJ. 2004;328:535–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Straus SE, Ball C, Balcombe N, Sheldon J, McAlister FA. Teaching evidence-based medicine skills can change practice in a community hospital. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:340–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Norman GR, Shannon SI. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. CMAJ. 1998;158:177–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Straus SE, Green ML, Bell DS, et al. Evaluating the teaching of evidence based medicine: conceptual framework. BMJ. 2004;329:1029–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patton MQ. Designing qualitative studies. In: Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1990. p. 145–198.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311:299–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Britten N. Qualitative research: qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 1995;310:1084–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Denzin NK. A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1970.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glaser BG, Straus AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320:114–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bryman A, Burgess R. eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1993.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Freeman AC, Sweeny K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ. 2001;323:110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Green ML, Ruff TR. Why do residents fail to answer their clinical questions? A qualitative study of barriers to practicing evidence based medicine. Acad Med. 2005;80:176–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors’ experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328:1162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, Grimshaw J, Eccles M. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerized evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326:314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Weel C, Knottnerus JA. Evidence-based interventions and comprehensive treatment. Lancet. 1999;353:916-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tracy CS, Dantas GC, Upshur REG. Evidence-based medicine in primary care: qualitative study of family physicians. BMC Fam Pract. 2003, 4:6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwart A, Millam G. A web based library consult service for evidence-based medicine: Technical development. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerem Shuval
    • 1
  • Aviv Shachak
    • 2
  • Shai Linn
    • 1
  • Mayer Brezis
    • 4
  • Paula Feder-Bubis
    • 3
  • Shmuel Reis
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Public HealthUniversity of HaifaMount Carmel HaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Galil Center for Medical Informatics and Telemedicine and The R&B Rappaport Faculty of MedicineTechnion-Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael
  3. 3.School of Public Health and Community MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  4. 4.Center for Clinical Quality & SafetyHadassah Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
  5. 5.Department of Medical Education, The R&B Rappaport Faculty of MedicineTechnion-Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations