Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 210–214

Mentoring at the University of Pennsylvania: Results of a Faculty Survey

  • Alan G. Wasserstein
  • D. Alex Quistberg
  • Judy A. Shea
Original Article

Background

Research suggests mentoring is related to career satisfaction and success. Most studies have focused on junior faculty.

Objective

To explore multiple aspects of mentoring at an academic medical center in relation to faculty rank, track, and gender.

Design

Cross-sectional mail survey in mid-2003.

Participants

Faculty members, 1,432, at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Measurements

Self-administered survey developed from existing instruments and stakeholders.

Results

Response rate was 73% (n = 1,046). Most (92%) assistant and half (48%) of associate professors had a mentor. Assistant professors in the tenure track were most likely to have a mentor (98%). At both ranks, the faculty was given more types of advice than types of opportunities. Satisfaction with mentoring was correlated with the number of types of mentoring received (r = .48 and .53, P < .0001), job satisfaction (r = .44 and .31, P < .0001), meeting frequency (r = .53 and .61, P < .0001), and expectation of leaving the University within 5 years (Spearman r = −.19 and −.18, P < .0001), at the assistant and associate rank, respectively. Significant predictors of higher overall job satisfaction were associate rank [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.04, CI = 1.29–3.21], the 10-point mentoring satisfaction rating (OR = 1.27, CI = 1.17–1.35), and number of mentors (OR = 1.60, CI = 1.20–2.07).

Conclusions

Having a mentor, or preferably, multiple mentors is strongly related to satisfaction with mentoring and overall job satisfaction. Surprisingly, few differences were related to gender. Mentoring of clinician–educators, research track faculty, and senior faculty, and the use of multiple mentors require specific attention of academic leadership and further study.

Key words

faculty mentoring faculty development promotion career satisfaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, Tolle SW. Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med. 1991;154:423–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Palepu A, Friedman, RH, Barnett RC, et al. Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73:318–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramanan R, Phillips R, Davis R, et al. Mentoring in medicine: keys to satisfaction. Am J Med. 2002;112:336–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fried, LP, Francomano, CA, MacDonald SM, et al. Career development for women in academic medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:898–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, et al. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:328–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhagia J, Tinsley JA. The mentoring partnership. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:535–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pololi LH, Knight SM, Dennis K, Frankel RM. Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: an innovative, collaborative mentoring program. Acad Med. 2002;77:377–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berk RA, Berg J, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo TP. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2005;80(1):66–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bakken LL. Who are physician–scientists’ role models? Gender makes a difference. Acad Med. 2005;80(5):502–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wise MR, Shapiro H, Bodley J, Pittini R, McKay D, Willan A, Hannah ME. Factors affecting academic promotion in obstetrics and gynaecology in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(2):127–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bellini L, Abbuhl S, Grisso JA, et al. Stresses and workplace resources for academic junior faculty: track and gender comparisons. Acad Med. 2001;76:S62–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foster, SW, McMurray, JE, Linzer, M, et al. Results of a gender–climate and work-environment survey at a midwestern academic health center. Acad Med. 2000;75:653–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thomas PA, Diener-West M, Canto MI, et al. Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2004;79:258–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howell LP, Bertakis KD. Clinical faculty tracks and academic success at the University of California medical schools. Acad Med. 2004;79:250–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rabatin JS, Lipkin M Jr, Rubin AS, Schachter A, Nathan M, Kalet A. A year of mentoring in academic medicine: case report and qualitative analysis of fifteen hours of meetings between a junior and senior faculty member. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(5 Pt 2):569–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan G. Wasserstein
    • 1
  • D. Alex Quistberg
    • 1
  • Judy A. Shea
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Faculty Affairs, 305 Anatomy Chemistry BuildingUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations