Family Physicians’ Attitudes and Practices Regarding Assessments of Medical Fitness to Drive in Older Persons
- First Online:
- 299 Downloads
Higher crash rates per mile driven in older drivers have focused attention on the assessment of older drivers.
To examine the attitudes and practices of family physicians regarding fitness-to-drive issues in older persons.
The questionnaire was sent to 1,000 randomly selected Canadian family physicians. Four hundred sixty eligible physicians returned completed questionnaires.
Self-reported attitudes and practices towards driving assessments and the reporting of medically unsafe drivers.
Over 45% of physicians are not confident in assessing driving fitness and do not consider themselves to be the most qualified professionals to do so. The majority (88.6%) feel that they would benefit from further education in this area. About 75% feel that reporting a patient as an unsafe driver places them in a conflict of interest and negatively impacts on the patient and the physician–patient relationship. Nevertheless, most (72.4%) agree that physicians should be legally responsible for reporting unsafe drivers to the licensing authorities. Physicians from provinces with mandatory versus discretionary reporting requirements are more likely to report unsafe drivers (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58 to 4.91), but less likely to perform driving assessments (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.85). Most driving assessments take between 10 and 30 minutes, with much variability in the components included.
Family physicians lack confidence in performing driving assessments and note many negative consequences of reporting unsafe drivers. Education about assessing driving fitness and approaches that protect the physician–patient relationship when reporting occurs are needed.
Key wordssurvey older drivers medical fitness to drive family physicians
- 5.Cerrelli E. Older drivers: The age factor in traffic safety. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1989 Feb. Report No.: DOT HS 807 402.Google Scholar
- 6.Canadian Medical Association. Determining medical fitness to drive: a guide for physicians. 6th edn. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Medical Association; 2000. Also available from: http://www.cma.ca/index.cfm/ci_id/18174/la_id/1.htm.
- 12.Wang CC, Kosinski CJ, Schwartzberg JG, Shanklin AV. Physician’s Guide to Assessing and Counseling Older Drivers. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2003.Google Scholar
- 14.Capen K. New court ruling on fitness-to-drive issues will likely carry “considerable weight” across country. CMAJ 1994;151:667.Google Scholar
- 16.Canadian Medical Directory [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: http://www.mdselect.com.
- 17.Dillman DA. Mail And Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd edn. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
- 19.Smith TW. A review of methods to estimate the status of cases with unknown eligibility. Report prepared for the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) Standard Definitions Committee. Version 1.1, September 2003.Google Scholar
- 20.Rao JNK, Scott AJ. On chi-squared tests for multiway contingency tables with proportions estimated from survey data. Annu Stat 1984;12:46–60.Google Scholar
- 23.The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, 4th edn. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR; 2006.Google Scholar
- 28.Miller DJ, Morley JE. Attitudes of physicians toward elderly drivers and driving policy. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;40:722–4.Google Scholar