Air Travel and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
- 1.1k Downloads
Despite multiple attempts to document and quantify the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following prolonged travel, there is still uncertainty about the magnitude of risk and what can be done to lower it.
To review the methodologic strength of the literature, estimate the risk of travel-related VTE, evaluate the efficacy of preventive treatments, and develop evidence-based recommendations for practice.
Studies identified from MEDLINE from 1966 through December 2005, supplemented by a review of the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and relevant bibliographies.
We included all clinical studies that either reported primary data concerning travel as a risk factor for VTE or tested preventive measures for travel-related VTE.
Data Extraction and Analysis
Two reviewers reviewed each study independently to assess inclusion criteria, classify research design, and rate methodologic features. The effect of methodologic differences, VTE risk, and travel duration on VTE rate was evaluated using a logistic regression model.
Twenty-four published reports, totaling 25 studies, met inclusion criteria (6 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies, and 9 randomized controlled trials). Method of screening for VTE [screening ultrasound compared to usual clinical care, odds ratio (OR) 390], outcome measure [all VTE compared to pulmonary embolism (PE) only, OR 21], duration of travel (<6 hours compared to 6–8 hours, OR 0.011), and clinical risk (“higher” risk travelers compared to “lower,” OR 3.6) were significantly related to VTE rate. Clinical VTE after prolonged travel is rare [27 PE per million flights diagnosed through usual clinical care, 0.05% symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed through screening ultrasounds], but asymptomatic thrombi of uncertain clinical significance are more common. Graduated compression stockings prevented travel-related VTE (P < 0.05 in 4 of 6 studies), aspirin did not, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) showed a trend toward efficacy in one study.
All travelers, regardless of VTE risk, should avoid dehydration and frequently exercise leg muscles. Travelers on a flight of less than 6 hours and those with no known risk factors for VTE, regardless of the duration of the flight, do not need DVT prophylaxis. Travelers with 1 or more risk factors for VTE should consider graduated compression stockings and/or LMWH for flights longer than 6 hours.
Key wordsvenous thromboembolism deep venous thrombosis pulmonary embolism air travel transportation systematic review
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest
- 1.International Trade Administration. U.S. International Air Travel Statistics Report: U.S. Department of Commerce; 2003.Google Scholar
- 5.Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. University of York. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/crddatabases.htm. Accessed May 26, 2006.
- 28.Cesarone MR, Belcaro G, Errichi B, et al. The LONFLIT4-Concorde deep venous thrombosis and edema study: prevention with travel stockings. Angiology. 2003;54(2):143–54.Google Scholar
- 29.Cesarone MR, Belcaro G, Nicolaides A, et al. The LONFLIT4-Concorde-Sigvaris Traveno stockings in long flights (EcoTRaS) study. Angiology. 2003;54(1):1–9.Google Scholar
- 30.Cesarone MR, Belcaro G, Nicolaides A, et al. Venous thrombosis from air travel: the LONFLIT3 study. Angiology. 2002;53:1–6.Google Scholar
- 34.Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics (3rd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
- 35.American Cancer Society. Pycnogenol, Pine Bark Extract. Available at: www.cancer.org. Accessed February 18, 2006.
- 40.Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost. 2000(83):657–60.Google Scholar