Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 2298–2306 | Cite as

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Post-operative Complications Following Major Gastrointestinal Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Joseph BeechamEmail author
  • Andrew Hart
  • Leo Alexandre
  • James Hernon
  • Bhaskar Kumar
  • Stephen Lam
Open Access
Review Article
  • 434 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The human genome is an under-researched area of pre-operative risk stratification. Studies of genetic polymorphisms and their associations with acute post-operative complications in gastrointestinal surgery have reported statistically significant results, but have varied in methodology, genetic variations studied, and conclusions reached. To provide clarity, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms and their association with post-operative complications after major gastrointestinal surgery.

Methods

We performed a literature search using Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if they investigated genetic polymorphisms and their associations with post-operative complications after major gastrointestinal surgery. We extracted clinical and genetic data from each paper and assessed for quality against the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) guidelines. Odds ratios were presented, with 95% confidence intervals, to assess strengths of association. We conducted a meta-analysis on TNF-α-308, which had been assessed in three papers.

Results

Our search returned 68 papers, of which 5 were included after screening and full-text review. Twenty-two different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were investigated in these studies. We found that all papers were genetic association studies, and had selected SNPs related to inflammation. The outcome investigated was most commonly post-operative infection, but also anastomotic leak and other non-infectious complications. Statistically significant associations were found for TNF-α-308, IL-10-819, PTGS2-765 and IFN-γ-874. There was significant variability in study quality and methodology. We conducted a meta-analysis on associations between the TNF-α-308 polymorphism and post-operative infection and report an OR of 1.18 (CI 0.27–5.21).

Conclusions

We found biologically plausible associations between SNPs involved in inflammation and post-operative infection, but the available data were too limited and of insufficient quality to reach definitive conclusions. Further work is needed, including genome-wide association studies (GWAS).

Keywords

Post-operative complications Genetics Gastrointestinal surgery 

Introduction

Gastrointestinal surgical pathology represents a growing challenge to healthcare systems around the world,1,2 with both developing and industrialised societies shouldering this burden.1,3, 4, 5, 6 In the UK alone, 1.3 m general surgical interventions take place annually.7 Unfortunately, major gastrointestinal surgery is accompanied by complication rates of up to 24%.8 Some 220,000 hospital admissions were due to complications from surgery in 2017–2018 in the UK alone.9 The commonest post-operative complication is infection, but others include cardiac arrhythmias and acute kidney injury, as well as anastomotic leakage and wound dehiscence.10 Although these have been ameliorated by advances in critical care, minimally invasive techniques, subspecialisation and centralisation of expertise, improved risk stratification may inform future interventions to reduce risk. Quantifying these risks accurately is ever more important as we face decisions to operate on a population that is increasingly older with significant co-morbidities.

Current perioperative risk management involves well-established tools such as P-POSSUM and ASA grades.11 However, these tools involve subjective judgement, and there is evidence that P-POSSUM scoring in particular overestimates risk.12, 13, 14 The genome’s contribution to post-operative complications is under-researched and may better explain variance which is unaccounted for by clinical assessment tools. For instance, there is convincing research linking genetic variation with the host response to sepsis and trauma, but there is limited work investigating this in surgery.15, 16, 17, 18 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the commonest form of genetic variation,19 and many have been linked to disease.20 For instance, polymorphisms associated with high TNF-α have been associated with sepsis.18,21TNF-α is a critical cytokine regulating acute inflammation via activation of immune cells, release of large amounts of inflammatory mediators, downstream signalling and endocrine effects.22

The association between particular SNPs and risk of developing post-operative complications has been explored in cardiac surgery,23 with one group reporting three SNPs associated with post-operative myocardial infarction.24 There have been several genetic association studies taking a similar approach in gastrointestinal surgery, which have aimed to identify whether particular polymorphisms are associated with poor outcome. These studies are challenging to interpret and were limited by small sample sizes, incomplete reporting of results, population stratification and implausible effects of individual SNPs, amongst others. To our knowledge, this is the first review examining these publications in a systematic manner. Such work may identify high-risk genes, which if externally validated as part of a clinical tool, could allow clinicians to offer improved risk prediction as part of the increasingly affordable ambition of personalised medicine. Addressing these risks perioperatively, with prehabilitation for example, could reduce future surgical morbidity and mortality.

Methods

Objectives

To systematically review studies in patients who have undergone major gastrointestinal surgery, and whether any single nucleotide polymorphisms are associated with post-operative complications.

Protocol and Registration

We followed the guidelines of the PRISMA statement25 in preparing this review and registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42019122342) on 15 February 2019.26

Search Strategy

We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE (using the Ovid platform) and Web of Science for papers published from January 1990 to January 2019. The following free-text terms were used: “surgical procedures”, “gastrointestinal surgery”, “genetic polymorphism”, “single nucleotide polymorphism”, “post-operative complications” and “post-operative outcomes”. For MEDLINE searches, we used the MeSH terms “digestive system surgical procedures” AND “polymorphism, genetic” AND “postoperative complications”. Searches involving MeSH terms included index subheadings. We also reviewed reference lists of both identified articles and review articles for additional relevant studies. We did not have any language restrictions.

Study Selection, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Studies were independently screened by title and abstract by JB and SL. Both authors subsequently performed full-text review. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with a third author. We considered a study for inclusion if it met the following criteria: (1) patients underwent major oesophagogastric, hepatobiliary and colorectal resections (elective or emergency), (2) the variation studied was a single nucleotide polymorphism, and (3) post-operative complications were investigated in the 90-day post-operative period. We excluded studies in less major operations, including cholecystectomy, appendectomy and hernia repair. We also excluded outcomes which were not strictly complications, such as analgesic requirement and risk of cancer recurrence. Participants with particular conditions including inflammatory bowel disease, transplant patients and immunocompromised individuals were also excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

For each eligible study after full-text review, we extracted year of publication, study population, sample size, patient demographics, post-operative outcomes, outcome measure, statistical analyses and statistic presented. Genetic information extracted included frequency of alleles, SNPs of interest, SNP reference identifier (where published), genotype method and locus.

Risk of Bias and Quality Assessment

Each study was assessed for quality using the STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) addendum to the Strengthening Reporting of Observational Studies (STROBE) statement.27

Statistical Analysis

Where multiple studies (defined as ≥ 3) reported on the same SNP, a meta-analysis was conducted. The analysis, as well as tests of heterogeneity, and Hardy-Weinberg calculations were performed using the MetaGenyo: Meta-Analysis of Genetic Association Studies tool.28 Our p value threshold for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was 0.05. If the included studies demonstrated significant heterogeneity, a random effects model was applied. Heterogeneity was assessed with a I2 statistic with values of 25% considered low, 50% moderate and 75% high. Egger’s test assessed for publication bias.

Results

Study Identification, Exclusion and Inclusion

Sixty-eight studies were identified through electronic searches of databases (Fig. 1), and one additional study was identified through hand-searching. There was a single duplicate. Sixty-eight records were screened by title and abstract, and 53 were excluded at this stage. Most exclusions were due to study participants being transplant patients. Fifteen full-text papers were assessed for eligibility and two were excluded due to participants with inflammatory bowel disease29,30 and one paper excluded for participants who had undergone transplant surgery.31 A further three were excluded due to reporting non-SNP sources of genetic variation, such as insertion/deletion (indel) polymorphisms,32, 33, 34 and four for reporting outcomes which were not of interest.35, 36, 37, 38 This resulted in five remaining studies.39, 40, 41, 42, 43
Fig. 1

Flow chart of study identification, exclusion and inclusion. Adapted from the PRISMA statement25

Study Designs, Sample Sizes and Data Analysis

Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the included studies. Two papers were from a Japanese population,41,42 the remainder were Irish,39 Indian40 and Dutch.43 All broadly used a case-control design and all secured ethical review. The vast majority of SNPs examined were from genes involved in inflammation. Two papers also measured pro-inflammatory cytokine levels.40,42 One of the papers looked predominantly at mouse anastomotic leakage but reported the results of a small SNP analysis in humans.43 Samples sizes ranged from 110 to 239 patients. The number of SNPs examined per study ranged from 1 to 15. Every study reported statistically significant findings. Three of the studies investigated solely infection as the primary outcome,40, 41, 42 whilst one a broad range of complications39 and one examined anastomotic leak.43 Three studies were in patients undergoing oesophagectomies,39,41,42 one in colectomies43 and one study examined a broad range of gastrointestinal surgical procedures.40
Table 1

Characteristics of included studies

First author

Year

Operation

Population

Patient sample size

SNPs

Genotype method

Statistic

Outcomes

Infection criteria

Azim, K39

2007

Oesophagectomy

Irish

197

TNF-⍺-238

TNF-⍺-308

TNF-⍺-857

TNF-⍺-863

IL-1β-31

IL-1β-511

IL-1β + 3953

IL-1β 5200

TLR4 + 896

IL-10-592

IL-10-819

IL-10-1082

TaqMan

χ 2

Fisher’s exact

Odds ratio

Infectious and non-infectious complications

Sepsis: SIRS + blood cultures

Pneumonia: either positive culture or clinical or radiological evidence of consolidation

Motoyama, S41

2009

Oesophagectomy

Japanese

110

IFN-γ-874

TNF-⍺-238

TNF-⍺-308

TNF-⍺-1031

TNF-β 250

TGF-β1 29

IL-1β-31

IL-1β-511

IL-2-330

IL-4-590

IL-6-634

IL-6 receptor 48892

IL-10-592

IL-12β-1188

PCR-RFLP

Pearson χ2

Fisher’s exact

Odds ratio

Infectious and non-infectious complications

Sepsis: positive blood cultures

Pneumonia: positive culture and radiologic evidence of consolidation

Baghel, K40

2014

Multiple GI surgeries

Indian

239

TNF-⍺-308

TaqMan

Pearson χ2

Fisher’s exact

Odds ratio

Infection

Sepsis: SIRS

Sakamoto, K42

2014

Oesophagectomy

Japanese

120

TNF-⍺-1031

IL-1β-511

IL-6-634

IL-10-819

ARMS-PCR

Pearson χ2

Fisher’s exact

Odds ratio

Pneumonia

Pneumonia: pyrexia > 38 °C and either positive sputum cultures or clear clinical or radiological evidence of consolidation

Reisinger, K43

2017

Colectomy

Dutch

148

PTGS2-765

PCR-RFLP

Pearson χ2

Anastomotic leak

Not applicable

Technical Weaknesses

Methodological quality was highly variable. Most papers did not explain how their sample sizes were calculated. Two papers failed to report on Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.40,43 Most papers did not use a standardised method of defining the SNP of interest (such as rs number). Although most papers used accepted definitions of surgical operations, one study used a broad definition of major gastrointestinal surgery and did not specify the precise procedures undertaken.40 One paper failed to report participant details such as age, gender or ethnicity.43 One paper did not report a full breakdown of genotype distributions.42 Two of the studies examined the same SNPs but came to opposite conclusions.39,40 There was highly variable reporting of laboratory methods of genetic analysis.

SNP Associations—Inflammation and Infection

All five papers examined polymorphisms associated with inflammation, as illustrated in Table 2. Four reported a positive association with an infectious complication,39, 40, 41, 42 and one paper found an positive association with anastomotic leak.43 One of the papers examined, but did not find, a link with non-infectious complications.41
Table 2

Studies demonstrating SNPs statistically significantly associated with infection

Study

SNP

Gene function

Reported genetic association

Reported statistic

Azim, 200739

TNF-α-308

Pro-inflammatory cytokine

A allele associated with a reduced risk of post-operative infections

p = 0.017

Baghel, 201440

TNF-α-308

Pro-inflammatory cytokine

A allele associated with an increased risk of post-operative sepsis

p = 0.037

Motoyama, 200941

IFN-γ-874

Pro-inflammatory cytokine

AT genotype associated with an increased risk of post-operative infections

p = 0.0215

Reisinger, 201643

PTGS2-765

COX-2 gene, pro-inflammatory function

CC genotype associated with an increased risk of post-operative anastomotic leak

p = 0.02

Sakamoto, 201442

IL-10-819

Anti-inflammatory cytokine

TT genotype associated with an increased risk of post-operative pneumonia

p = 0.0323

Twenty-two different SNPs in total were reported in these studies. Only two SNPs were investigated by three or more studies and eight SNPs were investigated by two more studies. The studies reported statistically significant associations for the following SNPs: TNF-α-308, IL-10-819, PTGS2-765 and IFN-γ-874 (Table 1).

Three studies reported results on IL-1β-511,39,41,42 another mediator of inflammation. One of these did not report allele distributions,42 so was unsuitable for a quantitative analysis.

Meta-analysis of TNF-α-308 Polymorphism

Three studies examined the effect of TNF-α-308 (rs1800629) on infection post-operatively39, 40, 41 (Fig. 2). The A allele is associated with increased levels of TNF-α protein44 and is considered the risk allele. Using the MetaGenyo28 statistical tool, we undertook a quantitative synthesis using a random effects model. Genotype distributions and Hardy-Weinberg p values are shown in Table 3. We used an allele contrast model (A allele vs G allele) and a dominant model (AA + AG vs GG). A recessive model was not suitable as one of the studies had no participants with the AA genotype.41 The allele contrast model (A vs G) reported an odds ratio of 1.18 (CI 0.27–5.21), p = 0.281, as shown in Table 4. Both models reported a I2 value of over 80% and Egger’s test p = 0.96. In both comparison models, the meta-analysis failed to demonstrate any significant association between the polymorphism and infectious outcome. Two of the papers came to opposite conclusions about the role of the allele.39,40
Fig. 2

Forest plot demonstrating TNF-α-308 and risk of infection, using an allele contrast model (A vs G)

Table 3

Genotype distributions and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in cases and controls

Study

Infectious complication

No infectious complication

 

AA

AG

GG

AA

AG

GG

HWE adjusted p value

Motoyama, 200941

0

0

18

0

1

90

0.958

Azim, 200739

0

17

38

10

60

72

0.899

Baghel, 201440

8

15

24

9

43

140

0.075

Table 4

Association test results for TNF-α-308 and infection, random effect method

Comparison model

Odds ratio

95% CI

p value

I 2

Allele contrast

1.176

[0.265; 5.214]

0.281

89%

Dominant model

1.155

[0.266; 5.009]

0.848

84%

Discussion

Key Results

This review found that research examining SNPs and post-operative complications has focussed almost exclusively on immunity and infection as clinical outcomes. We identified four polymorphisms of immune cytokine genes were associated with post-operative complications. We also conducted a meta-analysis of the only SNP which was examined by three or more studies, TNF-α-308. This polymorphism is involved in production of TNF-α, pro-inflammatory cytokine. Our meta-analysis examined the SNP in the context of gastrointestinal surgery. One study reported patients with the TNF-α-308 GG genotype had fourfold higher odds of a post-operative infection: OR 4.2 (CI 1.7–10.5),39 whilst another reported that it was the AA genotype which was associated with infection with OR 4.17 (CI 1.5–11.48).40 We can compare this with the results of a previous meta-analysis which examined TNF-α-308 in sepsis more generally. This found a much more conservative effect size with OR = 1.32 (p < 0.001) in the A vs G allele model in a much larger data set (n = 9373).45 The differing results could conceivably be explained by statistical error, for the reasons outlined below.

Limitations

We found that the variety of SNPs identified have not been researched in an organised fashion. Despite the number of SNPs examined (22), there was little overlap between papers in terms of which SNPs were studied. There was poor consistency between findings and results were not replicated. These findings are thus highly vulnerable to type 1 and 2 error. The problem is compounded by the very small size of relevant published research. We only identified five relevant papers in total, and only three which examined non-infectious complications. As Table 1 shows, there was also variability in how infection was defined in these studies, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity of results.

Our work has demonstrated highly variable outcome measures, populations, genotyping methods and conclusions. These methodological issues are common in genetic epidemiology.46 Results suitable for extensive meta-analysis are essential in genetic association studies but only a minority of positive gene-association results are ever reproducible.47,48 Large, well-powered samples are required to examine the effect of single polymorphisms on complex multifactorial outcomes,47,49 particularly when the true effect size may be small. The evidence presented here shows that further meta-analysis is essential because of small sample sizes, but also challenging because too few papers examined the same SNPs.

The scattershot approach taken in the existing literature is unlikely to yield meaningful results. These papers have all been genetic association studies with SNPs pre-selected. This makes the findings vulnerable to confirmation bias.

Interpretation and Biological Mechanisms

Despite the difficulties we have highlighted, it is biologically plausible that genetic variation leading to a dysregulated immune system could result in post-operative infection or sepsis. Sepsis is a complex entity involving aberrant host responses to an infectious pathogen.50 It involves a broad range of pro- and anti- inflammatory signals with mediation at the organ, tissue, cellular and molecular levels.51,52

TNF-α is a cytokine and pyrogen with a multitude of complex inflammatory effects, produced predominantly by macrophages but also by B and T lymphocytes.53,54 It induces downstream inflammatory pathways via nuclear factor κΒ activation and arachidonic acid formation.55 It has a synergistic effect with IL-1β and also has roles in apoptotic cell death, macrophage differentiation, IL-6 induction, fibroblast production, B cell proliferation and direct antiviral activity.53 It is also thought to have both pro- and anti-inflammatory roles depending on the phase of the acute insult.53,55 The TNF-α-308 functional polymorphism has been shown to correlate with variability in TNF cytokine production,56 and individuals who are genetically predisposed to over-express TNF-α suffer more pronounced inflammatory reactions.55 This would be consistent with published meta-analyses linking TNF-α polymorphisms to sepsis generally.18,45

Despite the promising explanatory framework for why a cytokine polymorphism may contribute to post-operative complications, our work shows that the existing data in major gastrointestinal surgery are not clear or strong enough to draw clinically meaningful conclusions at present.

Future Work

There are no genome-wide association studies (GWAS) published in this area. We suggest that an efficient route for answers would be for this type of study to be performed in the first instance, identifying candidate SNPs. These could then be tested in multiple large-scale genetic association studies, which could subsequently be meta-analysed.

Statement of Authorship

JB contributed to acquisition and analysis of data, the design and concept of the work, and drafted the manuscript. AH contributed to the conception, analysis and revisions of the work. LA, JH and BK contributed to analysis, interpretation and revisions of the work. SL contributed to the conception, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and revisions of the work. All authors approve of the final version of the manuscript.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, Ohene-Yeboah M, Uranues S, Vega Rivera F, Mock C (2014) Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg 101:e9–e22 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9329 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network (2018) Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (GBD 2017) Results. SeattleGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malhotra GK, Yanala U, Ravipati A, Follet M, Vijayakumar M, Are C (2017) Global trends in esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 115:564–579 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24592 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2017) Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 66:683–691 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    GlobalSurg Collaborative (2016) Mortality of emergency abdominal surgery in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Br J Surg 103:971–988 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tevis SE, Kennedy GD (2016) Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 29:246–52 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1584501 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NHS Digital (2018) Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity, 2017–18: Procedures and interventionsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    (2016) Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 117:601–609.  https://doi.org/10.1093/BJA/AEW316
  9. 9.
    NHS Digital (2018) Hospital Admitted Patient Care Activity, 2017–18: External causesGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sørensen LT, Malaki A, Wille-Jørgensen P, Kallehave F, Kjærgaard J, Hemmingsen U, Møller LN, Jørgensen T (2007) Risk Factors for Mortality and Postoperative Complications After Gastrointestinal Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:903–910 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0165-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliver CM, Walker E, Giannaris S, Grocott MPW, Moonesinghe SR (2015) Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 115:849–860 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev350 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bagnall NM, Pring ET, Malietzis G, Athanasiou T, Faiz OD, Kennedy RH, Jenkins JT (2018) Perioperative risk prediction in the era of enhanced recovery: a comparison of POSSUM, ACPGBI, and E-PASS scoring systems in major surgical procedures of the colorectal surgeon. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1627–1634 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3141-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen T, Wang H, Wang H, Song Y, Li X, Wang J (2013) POSSUM and P-POSSUM as Predictors of Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2501–2510 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2893-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stonelake S, Thomson P, Suggett N (2015) Identification of the high risk emergency surgical patient: Which risk prediction model should be used? Ann Med Surg 4:240–7 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2015.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thompson CM, Holden TD, Rona G, Laxmanan B, Black RA, OʼKeefe GE, Wurfel MM (2014) Toll-Like Receptor 1 Polymorphisms and Associated Outcomes in Sepsis After Traumatic Injury. Ann Surg 259:179–185 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828538e8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huebinger RM, Rivera-Chavez F, Chang L-Y, Liu M-M, Minei JP, Purdue GF, Hunt JL, Arnoldo BD, Barber RC (2010) IL-10 Polymorphism Associated with Decreased Risk for Mortality After Burn Injury. J Surg Res 164:e141–e145 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.021 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang GJ, Huang SL, Yien HW, Chen WS, Chi CW, Wu CW, Lui WY, Chiu JH, Lee TY (2000) Tumor necrosis factor gene polymorphism and septic shock in surgical infection. Crit Care Med 28:2733–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teuffel O, Ethier M-C, Beyene J, Sung L (2010) Association between tumor necrosis factor-α promoter −308 A/G polymorphism and susceptibility to sepsis and sepsis mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 38:276–282 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b42af0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lencz T, Darvasi A (2013) Single Nucleotyde Polymorphisms. Brenner’s Encycl Genet 442–444 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374984-0.01427-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Syvänen A-C (2001) Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 2:930–942 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/35103535 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Menges T, König IR, Hossain H, Little S, Tchatalbachev S, Thierer F, Hackstein H, Franjkovic I, Colaris T, Martens F, Weismüller K, Langefeld T, Stricker J, Hempelmann G, Vos PE, Ziegler A, Jacobs B, Chakraborty T, Bein G (2008) Sepsis syndrome and death in trauma patients are associated with variation in the gene encoding tumor necrosis factor*. Crit Care Med 36:1456-e6 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0B013E318170ABB6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brenner D, Blaser H, Mak TW (2015) Regulation of tumour necrosis factor signalling: live or let die. Nat Rev Immunol 15:362–374 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3834 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Podgoreanu M V. (2018) Perioperative Genomics. Genomic Precis Med 235–276 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801812-5.00009-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Podgoreanu MV, White WD, Morris RW, Mathew JP, Stafford-Smith M, Welsby IJ, Grocott HP, Milano CA, Newman MF, Schwinn DA, Team PG and SOS (PEGASUS) I (2006) Inflammatory Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Postoperative Myocardial Infarction After Cardiac Surgery. Circulation 114:I-275-I–281. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beecham J, Hart A, Alexandre L, Hernon J, Kumar B, Lam S (2019) CRD42019122342 The association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and post-operative complications following major gastrointestinal surgery. A systematic review of the literature. PROSPERO Int Prospect Regist Syst RevGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Little J, Higgins JP., Ioannidis JP., Moher D, Gagnon F, von Elm E, Khoury MJ, Cohen B, Davey-Smith G, Grimshaw J, Scheet P, Gwinn M, Williamson RE, Zou GY, Hutchings K, Johnson CY, Tait V, Wiens M, Golding J, van Duijn C, McLaughlin J, Paterson A, Wells G, Fortier I, Freedman M, Zecevic M, King R, Infante-Rivard C, Stewart A, Birkett N (2009) STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000022. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000022 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martorell-Marugan J, Toro-Dominguez D, Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Carmona-Saez P (2017) MetaGenyo: a web tool for meta-analysis of genetic association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 18:563 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1990-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sehgal R, Berg A, Hegarty JP, Kelly AA, Lin Z, Poritz LS, Koltun WA (2010) NOD2/CARD15 Mutations Correlate With Severe Pouchitis After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1487–1494. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f22635 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Germain A, Guéant RM, Chamaillard M, Allen PB, Bresler L, Guéant JL, Peyrin-Biroulet L (2016) NOD2 gene variant is a risk factor for postoperative complications in patients with Crohn’s disease: A genetic association study. Surg (United States) 160:74–80 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ningappa M, Higgs BW, Weeks DE, Ashokkumar C, Duerr RH, Sun Q, Soltys KA, Bond GJ, Abu-Elmagd K, Mazariegos G V, Alissa F, Rivera M, Rudolph J, Squires R, Hakonarson H, Sindhi R (2011) NOD2 gene polymorphism rs2066844 associates with need for combined liver-intestine transplantation in children with short-gut syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 106:157–65. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2010.322 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kahlke V, Schafmayer C, Schniewind B, Seegert D, Schreiber S, Schröder J (2004) Are postoperative complications genetically determined by TNF-β NcoI gene polymorphism? Surgery 135:365–373 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2003.08.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee J-M, Lo A-C, Yang S-Y, Tsau H-S, Chen RJ, Lee Y-C (2005) Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism with serum level and development of pulmonary complications following esophagectomy. Ann Surg 241:659–65 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SLA.0000157132.08833.98 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Siassi M, Riese J, Steffensen R, Meisner M, Thiel S, Hohenberger W, Schmidt J (2005) Mannan-binding lectin and procalcitonin measurement for prediction of postoperative infection. Crit Care 9:R483–9 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3768 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Motoyama S, Nakatsu T, Miura M, Hinai Y, Minamiya Y, Ogawa J (2012) Interleukin-6 -634G>C Genetic Polymorphism Is Associated with Prognosis following Surgery for Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dig Surg 29:194–201 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1159/000336952 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Motoyama S, Miura M, Hinai Y, Maruyama K, Usami S, Yoshino K, Nakatsu T, Saito H, Minamiya Y, Ogawa J (2011) Interleukin-2 −330T>G Genetic Polymorphism Associates with Prognosis Following Surgery for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1995–2002 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1553-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Motoyama S, Miura M, Hinai Y, Maruyama K, Murata K, Ogawa J (2010) C-reactive Protein −717C>T Genetic Polymorphism Associates with Esophagectomy-induced Stress Hyperglycemia. World J Surg 34:1001–1007 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0456-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Motoyama S, Miura M, Hinai Y, Maruyama K, Usami S, Nakatsu T, Saito H, Minamiya Y, Suzuki T, Ogawa J (2009) C-Reactive Protein 1059G>C Genetic Polymorphism Influences Serum C-Reactive Protein Levels after Esophagectomy in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 209:477–483 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.06.365 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Azim K, McManus R, Brophy K, Ryan A, Kelleher D, Reynolds J V. (2007) Genetic polymorphisms and the risk of infection following esophagectomy. Positive association with TNF-α gene -308 genotype. Ann Surg 246:122–128 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000259389.09161.49 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baghel K, Srivastava RN, Chandra A, Goel SK, Agrawal J, Kazmi HR, Raj S (2014) TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 Cytokines and Their Association with TNF-α-308 G/A Polymorphism and Postoperative Sepsis. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1486–1494 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2574-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Motoyama S, Miura M, Hinai Y, Maruyama K, Usami S, Nakatsu T, Saito H, Minamiya Y, Murata K, Suzuki T, Ogawa J (2009) Interferon-gamma 874A>T genetic polymorphism is associated with infectious complications following surgery in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. Surgery 146:931–938 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sakamoto K, Oka M, Yoshino S, Hazama S, Takeda S, Yoshimura K, Okayama N, Hinoda Y (2014) Relationship Between Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia with Esophageal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1247–1253 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2531-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reisinger KW, Schellekens DHSM, Bosmans JWAM, Boonen B, Hulsewé KWE, Sastrowijoto P, Derikx JPM, Grootjans J, Poeze M (2017) Cyclooxygenase-2 Is Essential for Colorectal Anastomotic Healing. Ann Surg 265:547–554 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001744 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wilson AG, Symons JA, McDowell TL, McDevitt HO, Duff GW (1997) Effects of a polymorphism in the human tumor necrosis factor alpha promoter on transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:3195–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhang Y, Cui X, Ning L, Wei D (2017) The effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha; rs1800629 and rs361525 polymorphisms on sepsis risk. Oncotarget 8:111456–111469 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.22824 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Newton-Cheh C, Hirschhorn JN (2005) Genetic association studies of complex traits: design and analysis issues. Mutat Res Mol Mech Mutagen 573:54–69 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MRFMMM.2005.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Colhoun HM, McKeigue PM, Smith GD (2003) Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet 361:865–872 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12715-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hirschhorn JN, Lohmueller K, Byrne E, Hirschhorn K (2002) A comprehensive review of genetic association studies. Genet Med 4:45–61 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/00125817-200203000-00002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Ntzani EE, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG (2003) Genetic associations in large versus small studies: an empirical assessment. Lancet 361:567–571 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12516-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche J-D, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent J-L, Angus DC (2016) The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:801. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D (2013) Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 13:862–874 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3552 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gotts JE, Matthay MA (2016) Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. BMJ 353:i1585 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1585 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sedger LM, McDermott MF (2014) TNF and TNF-receptors: From mediators of cell death and inflammation to therapeutic giants – past, present and future. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 25:453–472 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CYTOGFR.2014.07.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chaudhry H, Zhou J, Zhong Y, Ali MM, McGuire F, Nagarkatti PS, Nagarkatti M (2013) Role of cytokines as a double-edged sword in sepsis. In Vivo 27:669–84PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Elahi MM, Asotra K, Matata BM, Mastana SS (2009) Tumor necrosis factor alpha − 308 gene locus promoter polymorphism: An analysis of association with health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1792:163–172 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBADIS.2009.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mira J-P, Cariou A, Grall F, Delclaux C, Losser M-R, Heshmati F, Cheval C, Monchi M, Teboul J-L, Riché F, Leleu G, Arbibe L, Mignon A, Delpech M, Dhainaut J-F (1999) Association of TNF2, a TNF-α Promoter Polymorphism, With Septic Shock Susceptibility and Mortality. JAMA 282:561 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.6.561 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwich Medical SchoolUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations