Reduction in Cardiac Arrhythmias Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program in Colorectal Surgery
- 62 Downloads
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to achieve early recovery by preserving preoperative organ function and minimizing the stress response following surgery. Few studies have assessed the association between ERAS and postoperative cardiac complications. The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of ERAS on postoperative cardiac complications.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of colorectal patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary colorectal cancer referral center was carried out. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors including demographics, comorbidities, medications, and fluid administration were recorded. The primary outcome was postoperative cardiac arrhythmia, and secondary outcomes included other postoperative complications.
A total of 800 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery were identified. Four hundred seventeen patients (52%) were in the control group and 383 patients (48%) were in the ERAS group. Patients in both groups were similar with regard to demographics and clinical characteristics. There were significantly higher rates of cardiac arrhythmia in the control group (5.3%) compared with the ERAS group (1.8%), p = 0.009. Multivariable analysis revealed that ERAS was an independent predictor of decreased postoperative cardiac arrhythmia (OR 0.30, 95%CI 0.17–0.55, p < 0.001) while older age was an independent predictor of increased postoperative cardiac arrhythmia (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.02–1.13, p = 0.008). Patients receiving lower amounts of intravenous fluids had significantly decreased postoperative cardiac arrhythmia (OR = 0.25, 95%CI 0.09–0.67, p = 0.006).
ERAS and goal-directed fluid therapy are associated with significant reductions in postoperative cardiac arrhythmias.
KeywordsColorectal surgery ERAS Arrhythmia
All authors had substantial contributions to the design of the work, drafted the work, made the final approval, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. (2001) Recent advances. Management of patients in fast track surgery. Clinical review. Br J Surg 322:473–476.Google Scholar
- 8.Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, et al (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon rectum 46:851–859.Google Scholar
- 17.Uriburu JC, Cillo M, Estefania D, et al (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) implementation of a protocol in laparoscopic colectomy, initial experience in a single institution in Argentina. Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:101–111.Google Scholar
- 18.Khwaja A. (2012) KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract 120:c179-c184.Google Scholar
- 20.Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Nygren HJ, et al (2018) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 1–37.Google Scholar