Advertisement

Does Treatment of the Hiatus Influence the Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Chronic GERD?

  • Matías Mihura Irribarra
  • Sandra Blitz
  • Candice L. Wilshire
  • Anee Sophia Jackson
  • Alexander S. Farivar
  • Ralph W. Aye
  • Christy M. Dunst
  • Brian E. LouieEmail author
2018 SSAT Plenary Presentation
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Hiatal dissection, restoration of esophageal intra-abdominal length, and crural closure are key components of successful antireflux surgery. The necessity of addressing these components prior to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been questioned. We aimed to compare outcomes of MSA between groups with differing hiatal dissection and closure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 259 patients who underwent MSA from 2009 to 2017. Patients were categorized based on hiatal treatment: minimal dissection (MD), crural closure (CC), formal crural repair (FC), and extensive dissection without closure (ED). The primary outcome was normalization of postoperative DeMeester score (≤ 14.72). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess which preoperative predictors achieved normalization.

Results

Of the 197 patients, MD was used in 81 (41%); FC in 42 (22%); CC in 40 (20%); and ED in 34 (17%). Normalization occurred in 104 (53%) patients, with MD achieving normalization in 45/81 (56%); FC in 25/42 (60%); CC in 21/40 (53%); and ED 13/34 (38%). After regression, FC was most likely to normalize acid exposure. The presence of a hiatal hernia, defective LES, and higher preoperative DeMeester score were less likely to achieve normalization.

Conclusions

Hiatal dissection with restoration of esophageal length and crural closure during MSA increases the likelihood of normalizing acid exposure.

Keywords

Magnetic sphincter GERD Hiatal hernia Surgical outcomes Antireflux surgery Diaphragm 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Schneider AM, Louie BE. Anatomy of the Reflux Barrier in Health, Disease, and Recinstruction. In: Aye RW, Hunter JG, editors. Fundoplication Surgery. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Louie BE, Kapur S, Blitz M, Farivar AS, Vallières E, Aye RW. Length and Pressure of the Reconstructed Lower Esophageal Sphincter is Determined by Both Crural Closure and Nissen Fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):236–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonavina L, Saino GI, Bona D, Lipham J, Ganz RA, Dunn D, et al. Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter: Results of a feasibility clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(12):2133–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Warren HF, Brown LM, Mihura M, Farivar AS, Aye RW, Louie BE, et al. Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32(1):405-412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganz RA, Peters JH, Horgan S, Bemelman WA, Dunst CM, Edmundowicz SA, et al. Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(8):719–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(2):130–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ayazi S, Hagen JA, Zehetner J, Ross O, Wu C, Oezcelik A, et al. The value of high-resolution manometry in the assessment of the resting characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(12):2113–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campos G, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Obert S, Crookes PF, Tan S, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998;4(6):650.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warren HF, Louie BE, Farivar AS, Wilshire C, Aye RW. Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter after Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients with Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Ann Surg. 2017;266(1):99–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kahrilas PJ, Lin S, Manka M, Shi G, Joehl RJ. Esophagogastric junction pressure topography after fundoplication. Surgery. 2000;127(2):200–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwameis K, Nikolic M, Castellano DGM, Steindl A, Macheck S, Riegler M, et al. Crural closure improves outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation in GERD patients with hiatal hernia. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    James M Tatum, MD, Evan Alicuben, MD, Nikolai Bildzukewicz, MD, Kulmeet Sandhu, MD, Kameron Samakar, MD, Caitlin Houghton, MD, John L Lipham M. Minimal vs. Obligatory Dissection of the Diaphragmatic Hiatus During Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Surgery: An Intention to Treat Analysis. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2018; Available from:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6119-y
  13. 13.
    Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D, Sironi A, Lazzari V. One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(4):577–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Louie BE, Smith CD, Smith CC, Bell RCW, Gillian GK, Mandel JS, et al. Objective Evidence of Reflux Control After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation. Ann Surg 2018. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002789
  15. 15.
    Lord RVN, Demeester SR, Peters JH, Hagen JA, Elyssnia D, Sheth CT, et al. Hiatal Hernia, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence, and effectiveness of nissen fundoplication in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(4):602–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buckley FP, Bell RCW, Freeman K, Doggett S, Heidrick R. Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2018;32(4):1762–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith CD, Ganz RA, Lipham JC, Bell RC, Rattner DW. Lower Esophageal Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: The Safety of a Modern Implant. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2017;27(6):lap.2017.0025.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matías Mihura Irribarra
    • 1
  • Sandra Blitz
    • 2
  • Candice L. Wilshire
    • 3
  • Anee Sophia Jackson
    • 3
  • Alexander S. Farivar
    • 3
  • Ralph W. Aye
    • 3
  • Christy M. Dunst
    • 4
  • Brian E. Louie
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Foregut and Bariatric Surgery, General Surgery DepartmentBuenos Aires British HospitalBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Sandra Blitz StatisticsKelownaCanada
  3. 3.Division of Thoracic SurgerySwedish Medical Center and Cancer InstituteSeattleUSA
  4. 4.MIS Surgery, The Oregon ClinicPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations